Humanitext Reader

Aristotle · Politics §2.1267b

Critique of Phaleas Concluded and Hippodamus's Tripartite State

Passage 29 of 155 · Greek

Summary

After criticizing the insatiability of human desire and Phaleas's limited focus on land property, Aristotle begins to examine the ideal state proposed by Hippodamus of Miletus, the first non-politician to design a constitution based on tripartite divisions of citizens, land, and laws.

§2.1267bἔτι δʼ ἡ πονηρία τῶν ἀνθρώπων ἄπληστον, καὶ τὸ πρῶτον μὲν ἱκανὸν διωβελία μόνον, ὅταν δʼ ἤδη τοῦτʼ ᾖ πάτριον, ἀεὶ δέονται τοῦ πλείονος, ἕως εἰς ἄπειρον ἔλθωσιν.
Furthermore, the wickedness of human beings is insatiable; at first only two obols is sufficient, but when this has now become customary, they always need more, until they reach infinity.
ἄπειρος γὰρ ἡ τῆς ἐπιθυμίας φύσις, ἧς πρὸς τὴν ἀναπλήρωσιν οἱ πολλοὶ ζῶσιν.
For the nature of desire is infinite, and it is for its satisfaction that the many live.
τῶν οὖν τοιούτων ἀρχή, μᾶλλον τοῦ τὰς οὐσίας ὁμαλίζειν, τὸ τοὺς μὲν ἐπιεικεῖς τῇ φύσει τοιούτους παρασκευάζειν ὥστε μὴ βούλεσθαι πλεονεκτεῖν, τοὺς δὲ φαύλους ὥστε μὴ δύνασθαι· τοῦτο δʼ ἐστίν, ἂν ἥττους τε ὦσι καὶ μὴ ἀδικῶνται.
Therefore, the starting point for such things, rather than equalizing properties, is to train those who are decent by nature to be of such a character that they do not wish to get more, and the base so that they are unable to do so; and this is the case if they are both in a weaker position and are not treated unjustly.
οὐ καλῶς δὲ οὐδὲ τὴν ἰσότητα τῆς οὐσίας εἴρηκεν. περὶ γὰρ τὴν τῆς γῆς κτῆσιν ἰσάζει μόνον, ἔστι δὲ καὶ δούλων καὶ βοσκημάτων πλοῦτος καὶ νομίσματος, καὶ κατασκευὴ πολλὴ τῶν καλουμένων ἐπίπλων·
Moreover, he has not spoken well about the equality of property either; for he equalizes only concerning the possession of land, but there is also wealth in slaves, cattle, and money, and a great deal of equipment of what is called movables.
ἢ πάντων οὖν τούτων ἰσότητα ζητητέον ἢ τάξιν τινὰ μετρίαν, ἢ πάντα ἐατέον.
Either, therefore, one must seek equality in all these things, or some moderate regulation, or leave them all alone.
φαίνεται δʼ ἐκ τῆς νομοθεσίας κατασκευάζων τὴν πόλιν μικράν, εἴ γʼ οἱ τεχνῖται πάντες δημόσιοι ἔσονται καὶ μὴ πλήρωμά τι παρέξονται τῆς πόλεως.
But he appears from his legislation to construct a small city, if indeed all the artisans are to be public slaves and will not provide some complement to the city.
ἀλλʼ εἴπερ δεῖ δημοσίους εἶναι τοὺς τὰ κοινὰ ἐργαζομένους, δεῖ (καθάπερ ἐν Ἐπιδάμνῳ τε καὶ ὡς Διόφαντός ποτε κατεσκεύαζεν Ἀθήνησι) τοῦτον ἔχειν τὸν τρόπον.
But if indeed those who work at public tasks must be public slaves, it must be in this manner (just as in Epidamnus and as Diophantus once established in Athens).
περὶ μὲν οὖν τῆς Φαλέου πολιτείας σχεδὸν ἐκ τούτων ἄν τις θεωρήσειεν, εἴ τι τυγχάνει καλῶς εἰρηκὼς ἢ μὴ καλῶς.
Concerning the constitution of Phaleas, therefore, one might examine from these things whether he happens to have spoken well or not well.
Ἱππόδαμος δὲ Εὐρυφῶντος Μιλήσιος (ὃς καὶ τὴν τῶν πόλεων διαίρεσιν εὗρε καὶ τὸν Πειραιᾶ κατέτεμεν, γενόμενος καὶ περὶ τὸν ἄλλον βίον περιττότερος διὰ φιλοτιμίαν οὕτως ὥστε δοκεῖν ἐνίοις ζῆν περιεργότερον τριχῶν τε πλήθει καὶ κόσμῳ πολυτελεῖ, ἔτι δὲ ἐσθῆτος εὐτελοῦς μὲν ἀλεεινῆς δέ, οὐκ ἐν τῷ χειμῶνι μόνον ἀλλὰ καὶ περὶ τοὺς θερινοὺς χρόνους, λόγιος δὲ καὶ περὶ τὴν ὅλην φύσιν εἶναι βουλόμενος) πρῶτος τῶν μὴ πολιτευομένων ἐνεχείρησέ τι περὶ πολιτείας εἰπεῖν τῆς ἀρίστης.
Hippodamus of Miletus, the son of Euryphon (who also invented the division of cities and cut up the Piraeus, and who, because of his love of honor, became rather eccentric in his other lifestyle as well, so that he seemed to some to live too fastidiously with a large amount of hair and expensive ornaments, and furthermore with clothing that was cheap but warm, not only in winter but also during the summer seasons, and who wished to be learned about nature as a whole) was the first of those not engaged in politics to attempt to say something about the best constitution.
κατεσκεύαζε δὲ τὴν πόλιν τῷ πλήθει μὲν μυρίανδρον, εἰς τρία δὲ μέρη διῃρημένην· ἐποίει γὰρ ἓν μὲν μέρος τεχνίτας, ἓν δὲ γεωργούς, τρίτον δὲ τὸ προπολεμοῦν καὶ τὰ ὅπλα ἔχον.
He constructed the city as ten thousand in population, and divided it into three parts; for he made one part artisans, one farmers, and the third those who fight in defense and possess weapons.
διῄρει δʼ εἰς τρία μέρη τὴν χώραν, τὴν μὲν ἱερὰν τὴν δὲ δημοσίαν τὴν δʼ ἰδίαν· ὅθεν μὲν τὰ νομιζόμενα ποιήσουσι πρὸς τοὺς θεούς, ἱεράν, ἀφʼ ὧν δʼ οἱ προπολεμοῦντες βιώσονται, κοινήν, τὴν δὲ τῶν γεωργῶν ἰδίαν.
And he divided the territory into three parts: the sacred, the public, and the private; from which they will perform the customary rites to the gods, the sacred; from which those who fight in defense will live, the common; and the private territory for the farmers.
ᾤετο δʼ εἴδη καὶ τῶν νόμων εἶναι τρία μόνον· περὶ ὧν γὰρ αἱ δίκαι γίνονται, τρία ταῦτʼ εἶναι τὸν ἀριθμόν, ὕβριν βλάβην θάνατον.
He also thought that there are only three kinds of laws; for the things about which lawsuits occur are three in number: outrage, damage, and death.
ἐνομοθέτει δὲ καὶ δικαστήριον ἓν τὸ κύριον, εἰς ὃ πάσας ἀνάγεσθαι δεῖν τὰς μὴ καλῶς κεκρίσθαι δοκούσας δίκας· τοῦτο δὲ κατεσκεύαζεν ἐκ τινῶν γερόντων αἱρετῶν.
And he legislated also one supreme court, to which all lawsuits that did not seem to have been judged well must be referred; and he constructed this from certain selected elders.

Notes

  1. 1267b5τῶν οὖν τοιούτων ἀρχή — τῶν τοιούτων refers to the evils mentioned in the preceding text, such as the "wickedness of human beings" (ἡ πονηρία των ἀνθρώπων) and "infinite desire" (ἄπειρος ἐπιθυμία). ἀρχή here means the "starting point" or "first step, remedy" for addressing these problems, rather than "ruling."
  2. 1267b14εἴ γʼ οἱ τεχνῖται πάντες δημόσιοι ἔσονται — εἴ γε introduces a condition or ground ("if indeed", "assuming that"). δημόσιοι means that the artisans are to be public property (public slaves) rather than privately employed free citizens. πλήρωμα refers to the complement or constituent part of the city's citizen body.
  3. 1267b22ὃς καὶ τὴν τῶν πόλεων διαίρεσιν εὗρε... — From the subject Ἱππόδαμος in 1267b22 to βουλόμενος in 1267b29, a long relative clause (ὃς...) and participle phrases (γενόμενος..., βουλόμενος...) are nested to modify the subject. The main verb is ἐνεχείρησε ("attempted") in 1267b29. This long parenthetical structure must be unraveled to understand the core sentence structure.
  4. 1267b34ὅθεν μὲν τὰ νομιζόμενα ποιήσουσι... — The relative adverb ὅθεν ("from where", "wherefrom") indicates the source of revenue. The structure is elliptical: "ὅθεν μὲν ... [sc. τὴν χώραν] ἱεράν [sc. διῄρει]" (he divided [the land] from which they will perform the rites as sacred), which is parallel to "ἀφʼ ὧν δʼ ... [sc. τὴν χώραν] κοινήν [sc. διῄρει]" (and [the land] from which those who fight will live as common).

Cite this passage

Aristotle, Politics §2.1267b. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0086.tlg035.humanitext-grc2:2.1267b

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.