Humanitext Reader

Dionysius of Halicarnassus · Roman Antiquities §8.78.1-8.78.5

Condemnation of Cassius and Execution at Tarpeian Rock

Passage 656 of 962 · Greek

Summary

Cassius was accused of attempting to pass the land law without the senate's approval and plotting tyranny; the people, unmoved by his family or military achievements, condemned him to death, and he was thrown from the Tarpeian Rock.

§8.78.1πρὸς δὲ τούτοις διεξῄεσαν, ὅτι δημεῦσαι τὰ κοινὰ τῆς πόλεως ἐπιβαλόμενος οὔτε τῆς βουλῆς ψηφισαμένης οὔτε τῷ συνυπάτῳ δοκοῦν, βίᾳ κυροῦν ἐμέλλησε τὸν νόμον, ὃς οὐ καθʼ ἓν τοῦτο μόνον ἦν ἀσύμφορός τε καὶ ἄδικος, ὅτι προβουλεῦσαι δέον τὸ συνέδριον καὶ εἰ δόξειεν ἐκείνῳ κοινὴν ἁπάντων εἶναι τῶν ἐν τέλει τὴν φιλανθρωπίαν ἑνὸς ἀνδρὸς ἐποίει τὴν χάριν· §8.78.2ἀλλὰ καὶ κατʼ ἐκεῖνο τὸ πάντων σχετλιώτατον, ὅτι λόγῳ μὲν δόσις ἦν τοῖς πολίταις τῆς δημοσίας χώρας, ἔργῳ δʼ ἀφαίρεσις, Ῥωμαίων μὲν τῶν κτησαμένων αὐτὴν μίαν μοῖραν ληψομένων, Ἑρνίκων δὲ καὶ Λατίνων, ἧς οὐθὲν αὐτοῖς μετῆν, τὰς δύο·
In addition to these things, they detailed how, in attempting to distribute the public property of the state, with neither the senate having passed a decree nor the colleague consul agreeing, he had intended to force the law through by violence. This law was disadvantageous and unjust not only in this single respect—namely, that whereas the senate ought to have passed a preliminary decree and, if it had seemed good to them, the generosity should have been a common act of all those in authority, he made the favor that of a single man— but also in that most shocking respect of all: that in word it was a gift of public land to the citizens, but in fact a confiscation, since the Romans who had acquired it were to receive only one share, while the Hernici and Latins, who had no part in it, were to receive two shares.
καὶ ὡς οὐδὲ τοῖς δημάρχοις ἐναντιωθεῖσι καὶ παραλύειν ἐκ τοῦ νόμου θάτερον ἀξιοῦσι μέρος τὸ κατὰ τὴν ἰσομοιρίαν τῶν ἐπηλύδων, ἐπείσθη, ἀλλὰ καὶ δημάρχοις καὶ συνυπάτῳ καὶ βουλῇ καὶ πᾶσι τοῖς ὑπὲρ τοῦ κοινοῦ τὰ κράτιστα βουλευομένοις τἀναντία πράττων διετέλεσε.
And they detailed how he had not been persuaded even when the tribunes opposed him and demanded that he remove from the law the other part, which concerned the equal distribution to the newcomers, but had continued to act in opposition to the tribunes, his colleague consul, the senate, and all who consulted for the best interests of the public.
§8.78.3διεξελθόντες δὲ ταῦτα καὶ μάρτυρας αὐτῶν ἅπαντας τοὺς πολίτας ποιησάμενοι, μετὰ τοῦτʼ ἤδη καὶ τὰς ἀπορρήτους τῆς τυραννίδος παρείχοντο πίστεις, ὡς χρήματά τε συνενέγκαιεν αὐτῷ Λατῖνοι καὶ Ἕρνικες καὶ ὅπλα παρασκευάσαιντο καὶ συμπορεύοιντο ὡς αὐτὸν οἱ θρασύτατοι τῶν ἐν ταῖς πόλεσι νέων ἀπόρρητά τε ποιούμενοι βουλευτήρια καὶ πολλὰ πρὸς τούτοις ἕτερα ὑπηρετοῦντες, καὶ παρείχοντο τοὺς τούτων μάρτυρας πολλοὺς μὲν ἀστούς, πολλοὺς δʼ ἐκ τῶν ἄλλων συμμαχίδων πόλεων, οὔτε φαύλους οὔτʼ §8.78.4ἀφανεῖς.
Having detailed these things and having made all the citizens witnesses of them, they thereupon produced also secret proofs of his aiming at tyranny, to the effect that the Latins and Hernici had contributed money to him, had prepared weapons, and that the boldest of the young men in their cities came together to him, forming secret councils and rendering many other services to him besides. And they produced as witnesses of these things many citizens and many from the other allied cities, who were neither base nor obscure.
οἷς ἐπίστευσεν ὁ δῆμος, καὶ οὔτε λόγοις ἔτι ὑπαχθείς, οὓς ὁ ἀνὴρ ἐκ πολλῆς παρασκευῆς συγκειμένους διέθετο, οὔτʼ οἴκτῳ ἐνδοὺς τριῶν μὲν αὐτῷ παίδων μεγάλην παρεχόντων εἰς ἔλεον ἐπικουρίαν, πολλῶν δʼ ἄλλων συγγενῶν τε καὶ ἑταίρων συνολοφυρομένων, οὔτε τῶν κατὰ πολέμους ἔργων, διʼ οὓς ἐπὶ μήκιστον ἦλθε τιμῆς φειδὼ λαβών τινα, καταψηφίζεται τὴν δίκην.
The people believed these witnesses, and being no longer won over by the speeches which the man had composed with great preparation and delivered, nor yielding to pity though his three children offered a great aid to compassion, and many other relatives and friends lamented with them, nor showing any consideration for his deeds in war, because of which he had attained the highest honor, they found him guilty in the trial.
§8.78.5οὕτως τʼ ἄρα ἦν πικρὸς πρὸς τὸ τῆς τυραννίδος ὄνομα, ὥστʼ οὐδʼ ἐν τῷ τιμήματι τῆς δίκης μετρίᾳ ὀργῇ ἐχρήσατο πρὸς αὐτόν, ἀλλὰ θανάτου ἐτίμησεν.
And they were indeed so severe against the name of tyranny that they did not employ a moderate anger against him even in the assessment of the penalty, but condemned him to death.
εἰσῄει γὰρ αὐτὸν δέος, μὴ φυγὰς ἐλασθεὶς ἐκ τῆς πατρίδος ἀνὴρ στρατηγῆσαι πολέμους τῶν τότε δεινότατος ὅμοια δράσῃ Μαρκίῳ τά τε φίλια διαβάλλων καὶ τὰ ἐχθρὰ συνιστὰς καὶ πόλεμον ἄσπειστον ἐπαγάγῃ τῇ πατρίδι.
For a fear entered them lest, if he were driven as an exile from his country, a man who was then the most capable of all in conducting wars might act like Marcius, slandering his friends, uniting his enemies, and bringing an implacable war upon his country.
τοῦτο τὸ τέλος τῆς δίκης λαβούσης ἀγαγόντες οἱ ταμίαι τὸν ἄνδρα ἐπὶ τὸν ὑπερκείμενον τῆς ἀγορᾶς κρημνόν, ἁπάντων ὁρώντων ἔρριψαν κατὰ τῆς πέτρας.
When the trial had reached this end, the quaestors led the man to the cliff that overhung the Forum and, in the sight of all, cast him down from the rock.
αὕτη γὰρ ἦν τοῖς τότε Ῥωμαίοις ἐπιχώριος τῶν ἐπὶ θανάτῳ ἁλόντων ἡ κόλασις.
For this was the traditional punishment among the Romans of that time for those convicted on capital charges.

Notes

  1. 8.78.1οὔτε τῷ συνυπάτῳ δοκοῦν — The neuter singular participle "δοκοῦν" of the impersonal verb "δοκεῖ" forms an accusative absolute construction, expressing an accompanying circumstance: "without the colleague consul agreeing." Note the juxtaposition with the genitive absolute "οὔτε τῆς βουλῆς ψηφισαμένης".
  2. 8.78.1προβουλεῦσαι δέον τὸ συνέδριον — The participle "δέον" from the impersonal verb "δεῖ" is used in the accusative absolute, implying a concessive sense: "although the senate ought to have passed a preliminary decree." The subject of the infinitive "προβουλεῦσαι" is "τὸ συνέδριον".
  3. 8.78.4διʼ οὓς ἐπὶ μήκιστον ἦλθε τιμῆς — The relative pronoun "οὕς" is masculine plural, referring not to the immediate antecedent "τῶν κατὰ πολέμους ἔργων" (neuter plural), but to "πολέμους" (masculine plural, "wars") contained within that phrase, or it represents a constructio ad sensum (agreement according to sense) rather than grammatical gender.
  4. 8.78.5εισήει γάρ αυτόν δέος — The pronoun "αὐτόν" is singular, but contextually refers to the collective noun "the people" (ὁ δῆμος) mentioned previously.

Cite this passage

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities §8.78.1-8.78.5. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0081.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:8.78.1-8.78.5

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.