Dionysius of Halicarnassus · Roman Antiquities §7.66.1-7.66.5
The Peaceful End of the Sedition and Value of Speeches
Summary
The author reviews the first sedition of Rome and its peaceful end, explaining why he detailed the historical reasons behind the patricians' submission without resort to slaughter or exile. He emphasizes the importance of recording political speeches in historical narratives, as civic changes were achieved through persuasion rather than arms.
§7.66.1ἡ μὲν δὴ πρώτη Ῥωμαίοις ἐμπεσοῦσα μετὰ τὴν ἐκβολὴν τῶν βασιλέων στάσις ἔσχε τοιαύτας αἰτίας καὶ εἰς τοῦτο κατέσκηψε τὸ τέλος·
The first sedition, then, that befell the Romans after the expulsion of the kings had such causes and terminated in this end.
ἐμήκυνα δὲ τὸν ὑπὲρ αὐτῶν λόγον τοῦ μή τινα θαυμάσαι, πῶς ὑπέμειναν οἱ πατρίκιοι τηλικαύτης ἐξουσίας ποιῆσαι τὸν δῆμον κύριον, οὔτε σφαγῆς τῶν ἀρίστων ἀνδρῶν γενομένης οὔτε φυγῆς, οἷον ἐν ἄλλαις πολλαῖς ἐγένετο πόλεσι.
I have lengthened the account of them in order that no one might wonder how the patricians submitted to make the people master of such great authority, without either a slaughter of the best men having taken place or an exile, as happened in many other cities.
ποθεῖ γὰρ ἕκαστος ἐπὶ τοῖς παραδόξοις ἀκούσμασι τὴν αἰτίαν μαθεῖν καὶ τὸ πιστὸν ἐν ταύτῃ τίθεται μόνῃ.
For everyone desires to learn the cause of unexpected accounts, and credibility is placed in this alone.
§7.66.2ἐλογιζόμην οὖν, ὅτι μοι πολλοῦ καὶ τοῦ παντὸς δεήσει πιστὸς εἶναι ὁ λόγος, εἰ τοσοῦτον ἔφην μόνον, ὅτι παρῆκαν οἱ πατρίκιοι τοῖς δημοτικοῖς τὴν ἑαυτῶν δυναστείαν, καὶ ἐξὸν αὐτοῖς ἐν ἀριστοκρατίᾳ πολιτεύεσθαι τὸν δῆμον ἐποίησαν τῶν μεγίστων κύριον, διʼ ἃς δὲ συνεχωρήθη ταῦτʼ αἰτίας παρέλιπον· διὰ τοῦτʼ ἐπεξῆλθον ἁπάσας.
I considered, therefore, that my account would lack credibility by a great deal, indeed entirely, if I had only said this much, that the patricians surrendered their own power to the plebeians, and that, though it was in their power to govern under an aristocracy, they made the people master of the greatest things, but omitted the reasons for which these things were conceded; for this reason I went into detail about all of them.
§7.66.3καὶ ἐπειδὴ οὐχ ὅπλοις ἀλλήλους βιασάμενοι καὶ προσαναγκάσαντες, ἀλλὰ λόγοις πείσαντες μεθήρμοσαν, παντὸς μάλιστʼ ἀναγκαῖον ἡγησάμην εἶναι τοὺς λόγους αὐτῶν διεξελθεῖν, οἷς τότʼ οἱ δυναστεύσαντες ἐν ἑκατέροις ἐχρήσαντο.
And since they adjusted their differences not by forcing and compelling one another with arms, but by persuading with words, I thought it of all things most necessary to detail their speeches, which the leading men on both sides then employed.
θαυμάσαιμι δʼ ἄν, εἴ τινες τὰς ἐν τοῖς πολέμοις πράξεις ἀκριβῶς οἴονται δεῖν ἀναγράφειν, καὶ περὶ μίαν ἔστιν ὅτε μάχην πολλοὺς ἀναλίσκουσι λόγους, τόπων τε φύσεις καὶ ὁπλισμῶν ἰδιότητας καὶ τάξεων τρόπους καὶ στρατηγῶν παρακλήσεις καὶ τἆλλα διεξιόντες ὅσα τῆς νίκης αἴτια τοῖς ἑτέροις ἐγένετο· πολιτικὰς δὲ κινήσεις καὶ στάσεις ἀναγράφοντες οὐκ οἴονται δεῖν ἀπαγγέλλειν τοὺς λόγους, δι’ ὧν αἱ παράδοξοι καὶ θαυμασταὶ πράξεις ἐπετελέσθησαν.
I should wonder, indeed, if some people think it necessary to record actions in war with accuracy, and sometimes expend many words on a single battle, describing the nature of the places, the peculiarities of the armor, the arrangements of the ranks, the exhortations of the generals, and all the other things that were the causes of victory for one side; yet, when recording political movements and seditions, they do not think they ought to report the speeches by which those unexpected and wonderful achievements were accomplished.
§7.66.4εἰ γάρ τι καὶ ἄλλο τῆς Ῥωμαίων πόλεως μέγα ἐγκώμιόν ἐστι καὶ ζηλοῦσθαι ὑπὸ πάντων ἀνθρώπων ἄξιον κἀκεῖνο ἐγένετο κατʼ ἐμὴν δόξαν τὸ ἔργον, μᾶλλον δʼ ὑπὲρ ἅπαντα πολλὰ καὶ θαυμαστὰ ὄντα λαμπρότατον, τὸ μήτε τοὺς δημοτικοὺς καταφρονήσαντας τῶν πατρικίων ἐπιχειρῆσαι αὐτοῖς, καὶ πολὺν ἐργασαμένους τῶν κρατίστων φόνον ἅπαντα τἀκείνων παραλαβεῖν, μήτε τοὺς ἐν τοῖς ἀξιώμασιν ἢ διὰ σφῶν αὐτῶν ἢ ξενικαῖς ἐπικουρίαις χρησαμένους διαφθεῖραι τὸ δημοτικὸν ἅπαν καὶ τὸ λοιπὸν οἰκεῖν ἀδεῶς τὴν πόλιν· §7.66.5ἀλλʼ ὥσπερ ἀδελφοὺς ἀδελφοῖς ἢ παῖδας γονεῦσιν ἐν οἰκίᾳ σώφρονι περὶ τῶν ἴσων καὶ δικαίων διαλεγομένους πειθοῖ καὶ λόγῳ διαλύεσθαι τὰ νείκη, ἀνήκεστον δʼ ἢ ἀνόσιον ἔργον μηθὲν ὑπομεῖναι δρᾶσαι κατʼ ἀλλήλων· οἷα Κερκυραῖοί τε κατὰ τὴν στάσιν εἰργάσαντο καὶ Ἀργεῖοι καὶ Μιλήσιοι καὶ Σικελία πᾶσα καὶ συχναὶ ἄλλαι πόλεις.
For if there is any other great praise of the Roman state, worthy of being envied by all men, that deed too was such in my opinion, or rather the most illustrious of all, many and wonderful though they are—namely, that neither the plebeians, holding the patricians in contempt, attacked them and, having wrought a great slaughter of the best men, seized all their possessions, nor did those in high offices, either by themselves or by employing foreign aids, destroy the entire body of the plebeians and henceforth inhabit the city without fear; but, just like brothers with brothers or children with parents in a well-ordered household debating about fairness and justice, they dissolved their quarrels through persuasion and reason, and did not bring themselves to commit any irreparable or impious act against one another—such as the Corcyraeans did during their sedition, and the Argives, the Milesians, all Sicily, and many other cities.
ἐγὼ μὲν οὖν διὰ ταῦτα προειλόμην ἀκριβεστέραν μᾶλλον ἢ βραχυτέραν ποιήσασθαι τὴν διήγησιν· κρινέτω δʼ ἕκαστος ὡς βούλεται.
For these reasons, then, I chose to make my narrative more accurate rather than shorter; but let each man judge as he pleases.
Notes
- §7.66.1τοῦ μή τινα θαυμάσαι — A genitive of the articular infinitive with `τοῦ` and the negative `μή` used to express purpose or negative result. It explains the author's purpose in lengthening the account, so that the reader might not wonder at the patricians' peaceful submission.
- §7.66.2ἐξόν — The neuter accusative singular present participle of the impersonal verb `ἔξεστι` (it is possible). Used in the accusative absolute construction with a concessive force ('although it was in their power to...'). The dative `αὐτοῖς` serves as the subject of the following infinitive `πολιτεύεσθαι`.
- §7.66.3θαυμάσαιμι δʼ ἄν, εἴ τινες... — A mixed conditional construction where the main clause uses the optative with `ἄν` (`θαυμάσαιμι ἄν`, potential/mild assertion: 'I should wonder') while the protasis is introduced by `εἰ` with the present indicative (`οἴονται`). It serves to express a polite but firm criticism of historians who overlook political speeches.
- §7.66.4τὸ μήτε τοὺς δημοτικοὺς ... μήτε τοὺς ἐν τοῖς ἀξιώμασιν ... — An articular infinitive clause in apposition to the demonstrative pronoun `κἀκεῖνο ... τὸ ἔργον` ('that deed') in the main clause. The subject of the infinitives `ἐπιχειρῆσαι`, `παραλαβεῖν`, `διαφθεῖραι`, and `οἰκεῖν` is expressed in the accusative (`τοὺς δημοτικούς` and `τοὺς ἐν τοῖς ἀξιώμασιν` respectively). The double negative `μήτε... μήτε...` structurally outlines the mutual restraint shown by both plebeians and patricians.
Cite this passage
Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities §7.66.1-7.66.5. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0081.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:7.66.1-7.66.5
Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.
Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.