Humanitext Reader

Dionysius of Halicarnassus · Roman Antiquities §5.18.1-5.18.2

Inquiry into the Lineage and Descendants of Brutus

Passage 347 of 962 · Greek

Summary

The author discusses the death of Brutus and his lack of descendants, highlighting that he was a patrician in contrast to the later plebeian Bruti, and leaves further examination of this historical question to interested readers.

§5.18.1Ἰούνιος μὲν δὴ Βροῦτος ὁ τὴν βασιλείαν ἐκβαλὼν καὶ πρῶτος ἀποδειχθεὶς ὕπατος, ὀψὲ μὲν εἰς ἐπιφάνειαν προελθών, ἀκαρῆ δὲ χρόνον ἀνθήσας ἐν αὐτῇ Ῥωμαίων ἁπάντων κράτιστος φανεὶς τοιαύτης τελευτῆς ἔτυχε, γενεὰν οὔτε ἄρρενα καταλιπὼν οὔτε θήλειαν, ὡς οἱ τὰ Ῥωμαίων σαφέστατα ἐξητακότες γράφουσι, τεκμήρια πολλὰ μὲν καὶ ἄλλα τούτου φέροντες, ὑπὲρ ἅπαντα δʼ ὃ δυσαντίλεκτόν ἐστιν, ὅτι τοῦ πατρικίων γένους ἐκεῖνος ἦν, οἱ δʼ ἀπʼ ἐκείνης αὑτοὺς λέγοντες εἶναι τῆς οἰκίας Ἰούνιοί τε καὶ Βροῦτοι πάντες ἦσαν πλήβειοι καὶ τὰς ἀρχὰς μετῄεσαν, ἃς τοῖς δημοτικοῖς μετιέναι νόμος, ἀγορανομίας τε καὶ δημαρχίας, ὑπατείαν δʼ οὐδείς, ἧς τοῖς πατρικίοις μετῆν.
Lucius Junius Brutus, who expelled the kings and was the first to be appointed consul, though he came late into prominence and flourished in it for but a moment, appearing as the noblest of all the Romans, met with such an end, leaving behind no offspring, either male or female, as those who have investigated Roman history with the greatest accuracy write. They bring forward many other proofs of this, but above all, what is indisputable is that he was of patrician descent, whereas all the Junii and Bruti who claimed to belong to that house were plebeians and sought those offices which it was lawful for the plebeians to seek, namely the aedileship and the tribuneship, but none of them sought the consulship, which belonged to the patricians.
§5.18.2ὀψὲ δέ ποτε καὶ ταύτης ἔτυχον τῆς ἀρχῆς, ὅτε συνεχωρήθη καὶ τοῖς δημοτικοῖς αὐτὴν λαβεῖν.
But at a late period they did obtain this office also, when it was permitted to the plebeians as well to hold it.
ἀλλʼ ὑπὲρ μὲν τούτων οἷς μέλει τε καὶ διαφέρει τὸ σαφὲς εἰδέναι παρίημι σκοπεῖν.
However, I leave the investigation of these matters to those who care and for whom it makes a difference to know the exact truth.

Notes

  1. 888ἐν αὐτῇ — The antecedent of the feminine demonstrative pronoun αὐτῇ is the preceding feminine noun ἐπιφάνειαν, meaning 'prominence' or 'celebrity'. Thus it is interpreted as 'in that prominence'.
  2. 5.18.1ὃ δυσαντίλεκτόν ἐστιν — The relative pronoun ὃ has no direct preceding antecedent but forms a subjective noun phrase whose substantial content is explained by the following ὅτι clause (that Brutus was a patrician and the later family members were plebeians).
  3. 10ἧς τοῖς πατρικίοις μετῆν — An construction with the impersonal verb μέτεστι (to have a share in), where the relative pronoun in the genitive ἧς (whose antecedent is ὑπατείαν, 'consulship') is combined with the dative τοῖς πατρικίοις ('to the patricians').

Cite this passage

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities §5.18.1-5.18.2. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0081.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:5.18.1-5.18.2

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.