Humanitext Reader

Plato · Phaedo §97

Anaxagoras' Mind and Socrates' Great Hopes

Passage 38 of 55 · Greek

Summary

Socrates recalls his dissatisfaction with physical and mathematical explanations of causes, and how he felt great hope upon hearing of Anaxagoras' theory that Mind is the cause and arranger of all things.

§97ΦΑΙΔ. πόρρω που, ἔφη, νὴ Δία ἐμὲ εἶναι τοῦ οἴεσθαι περὶ τούτων του τὴν αἰτίαν εἰδέναι, ὅς γε οὐκ ἀποδέχομαι ἐμαυτοῦ οὐδὲ ὡς ἐπειδὰν ἑνί τις προσθῇ ἕν, ἢ τὸ ἓν ᾧ προσετέθη δύο γέγονεν, ἢ τὸ προστεθέν, ἢ τὸ προστεθὲν καὶ ᾧ προσετέθη διὰ τὴν πρόσθεσιν τοῦ ἑτέρου τῷ ἑτέρῳ δύο ἐγένετο·
Phaedo: "By Zeus," he said, "I am far from thinking that I know the cause of any of these things, since I do not accept from myself even that, when someone adds one to one, either the one to which it was added has become two, or the one added, or the added one and that to which it was added have become two because of the addition of the one to the other.
θαυμάζω γὰρ εἰ ὅτε μὲν ἑκάτερον αὐτῶν χωρὶς ἀλλήλων ἦν, ἓν ἄρα ἑκάτερον ἦν καὶ οὐκ ἤστην τότε δύο, ἐπεὶ δ’ ἐπλησίασαν ἀλλήλοις, αὕτη ἄρα αἰτία αὐτοῖς ἐγένετο τοῦ δύο γενέσθαι, ἡ σύνοδος τοῦ πλησίον ἀλλήλων τεθῆναι.
For I wonder if, when each of them was separate from the other, each was then one and they were not then two, but when they came near to one another, this then became the cause for them of becoming two, namely, the union of being placed near each other.
οὐδέ γε ὡς ἐάν τις ἓν διασχίσῃ, δύναμαι ἔτι πείθεσθαι ὡς αὕτη αὖ αἰτία γέγονεν, ἡ σχίσις, τοῦ δύο γεγονέναι· ἐναντία γὰρ γίγνεται ἢ τότε αἰτία τοῦ δύο γίγνεσθαι.
Nor, if someone cleaves one, can I any longer persuade myself that this, the division, has in turn become the cause of its becoming two; for that is the opposite of the cause of becoming two in the former case.
τότε μὲν γὰρ ὅτι συνήγετο πλησίον ἀλλήλων καὶ προσετίθετο ἕτερον ἑτέρῳ, νῦν δ’ ὅτι ἀπάγεται καὶ χωρίζεται ἕτερον ἀφ’ ἑτέρου.
For then it was because they were brought near each other and one was added to another, but now it is because one is led away and separated from another.
οὐδέ γε δι’ ὅτι ἓν γίγνεται ὡς ἐπίσταμαι, ἔτι πείθω ἐμαυτόν, οὐδ’ ἄλλο οὐδὲν ἑνὶ λόγῳ δι’ ὅτι γίγνεται ἢ ἀπόλλυται ἢ ἔστι, κατὰ τοῦτον τὸν τρόπον τῆς μεθόδου, ἀλλά τιν’ ἄλλον τρόπον αὐτὸς εἰκῇ φύρω, τοῦτον δὲ οὐδαμῇ προσίεμαι.
Nor indeed do I any longer persuade myself that I know why one comes to be, nor, in a word, why anything else comes to be or perishes or exists, according to this method of inquiry; but I mix up some other way for myself at random, and this one I do not accept at all.
ἀλλ’ ἀκούσας μέν ποτε ἐκ βιβλίου τινός, ὡς ἔφη, Ἀναξαγόρου ἀναγιγνώσκοντος, καὶ λέγοντος ὡς ἄρα νοῦς ἐστιν ὁ διακοσμῶν τε καὶ πάντων αἴτιος, ταύτῃ δὴ τῇ αἰτίᾳ ἥσθην τε καὶ ἔδοξέ μοι τρόπον τινὰ εὖ ἔχειν τὸ τὸν νοῦν εἶναι πάντων αἴτιον, καὶ ἡγησάμην, εἰ τοῦθ’ οὕτως ἔχει, τόν γε νοῦν κοσμοῦντα πάντα κοσμεῖν καὶ ἕκαστον τιθέναι ταύτῃ ὅπῃ ἂν βέλτιστα ἔχῃ·
But having once heard someone reading from a book, as he said, of Anaxagoras, and saying that it is Mind that arranges and is the cause of all things, I was pleased with this cause, and it seemed to me in a way to be well that Mind should be the cause of all things, and I thought that, if this is so, Mind in arranging all things arranges them and places each thing in the way that is best.
εἰ οὖν τις βούλοιτο τὴν αἰτίαν εὑρεῖν περὶ ἑκάστου ὅπῃ γίγνεται ἢ ἀπόλλυται ἢ ἔστι, τοῦτο δεῖν περὶ αὐτοῦ εὑρεῖν, ὅπῃ βέλτιστον αὐτῷ ἐστιν ἢ εἶναι ἢ ἄλλο ὁτιοῦν πάσχειν ἢ ποιεῖν· ἐκ δὲ δὴ τοῦ λόγου τούτου οὐδὲν ἄλλο σκοπεῖν προσήκειν ἀνθρώπῳ καὶ περὶ αὐτοῦ ἐκείνου καὶ περὶ τῶν ἄλλων ἀλλ᾽ ἢ τὸ ἄριστον καὶ τὸ βέλτιστον.
If, then, anyone wished to find the cause of how each thing comes to be or perishes or exists, he must find this concerning it: how it is best for it either to exist or to undergo or do anything else; and from this argument, it befitted a human being to examine nothing else, both concerning that thing itself and concerning other things, except what is most excellent and best.
ἀναγκαῖον δὲ εἶναι τὸν αὐτὸν τοῦτον καὶ τὸ χεῖρον εἰδέναι· τὴν αὐτὴν γὰρ εἶναι ἐπιστήμην περὶ αὐτῶν.
And it was necessary that this same person should also know the worse; for the knowledge concerning them is the same.
ταῦτα δὴ λογιζόμενος ἅσμενος ηὑρηκέναι ᾤμην διδάσκαλον τῆς αἰτίας περὶ τῶν ὄντων κατὰ νοῦν ἐμαυτῷ, τὸν Ἀναξαγόραν, καί μοι φράσειν πρῶτον μὲν πότερον ἡ γῆ πλατεῖά ἐστιν ἢ στρογγύλη, ἐπειδὴ δὲ φράσειεν, ἐπεκδιηγήσεσθαι τὴν αἰτίαν καὶ τὴν ἀνάγκην, λέγοντα τὸ ἄμεινον καὶ ὅτι αὐτὴν ἄμεινον ἦν τοιαύτην εἶναι· καὶ εἰ ἐν μέσῳ φαίη εἶναι αὐτήν, ἐπεκδιηγήσεσθαι ὡς ἄμεινον ἦν αὐτὴν ἐν μέσῳ εἶναι· καὶ εἴ μοι ταῦτα ἀποφαίνοι, παρεσκευάσμην ὡς οὐκέτι ποθεσόμενος αἰτίας ἄλλο εἶδος.
Reasoning thus, I thought with pleasure that I had found in Anaxagoras a teacher of the cause of things that are, after my own mind, and that he would tell me first whether the earth is flat or round, and when he had told me, he would go on to explain the cause and the necessity, telling me what was better and why it was better for it to be such; and if he should say it was in the middle, he would go on to explain how it was better for it to be in the middle; and if he should show these things to me, I was prepared not to desire any other kind of cause anymore."

Notes

  1. 97πόρρω που... ἐμὲ εἶναι τοῦ οἴεσθαι — ἐμὲ εἶναι is an accusative with infinitive clause which serves as Socrates' direct response to Cebes' question, but is framed in indirect speech governed by ἔφη ("he said"). The articular infinitive τοῦ οἴεσθαι in the genitive depends on the adverb πόρρω ("far from"), expressing separation or distance from the state of "thinking/imagining."
  2. 97aὅς γε οὐκ ἀποδέχομαι ἐμαυτοῦ — The relative pronoun ὅς combined with the particle γε introduces a causal relative clause ("inasmuch as I...", "since I indeed..."). The verb ἀποδέχομαι ("accept") takes the genitive pronoun ἐμαυτοῦ to mean "accept from myself" or "allow myself to believe," expressing a self-reflective process of conviction.
  3. 97bοὐδέ γε δι’ ὅτι ἓν γίγνεται ὡς ἐπίσταμαι, ἔτι πείθω ἐμαυτόν — A highly hyperbatic clause. The main verb of the assertion is πείθω with its object ἐμαυτόν. The ὡs clause (ὡς ἐπίσταμαι, "that I know") represents the object clause of πείθω (persuading myself that...), which in turn governs the preposed indirect question δι’ ὅτι ἓν γίγνεται ("why one comes to be") as its object.
  4. 97cὡς ἔφη, Ἀναξαγόρου ἀναγιγνώσκοντος — Ἀναξαγόρου is best construed as a possessive genitive modifying βιβλίου in the prepositional phrase ἐκ βιβλίου τινός ("from a book of Anaxagoras"). The genitive participle ἀναγιγνώσκοντος refers to the person reading, governed by the main participle ἀκούσας ("having heard [someone] reading"). Although it could grammatically be taken as a genitive absolute ("when Anaxagoras was reading"), the context implies Socrates heard someone else reading from Anaxagoras' book.
  5. 97dἐκ δὲ δὴ τοῦ λόγου τούτου οὐδὲν ἄλλο σκοπεῖν προσήκειν — προσήκειν is the infinitive of the impersonal verb προσήκει ("it is fitting/proper"), which is dependent on the indirect speech introduced by ἡγησάμην ("I thought") or continuing the series of infinitives after δεῖν. The dative ἀνθρώπῳ serves as the complement of this impersonal construction ("for a human being to examine nothing else").
  6. 97eἐπειδὴ δὲ φράσειεν... καὶ εἴ μοι... ἀποφαίνοι — These clauses express future expectations from a past perspective ("once he should explain," "if he should show"). In direct speech, they would have used the subjunctive with ἄν (e.g., ἐπειδὰν φράσῃ) or a future condition. Because they are embedded in indirect speech dependent on past main verbs (ᾤμην, παρεσκευάσμην), they are attracted into the optative mood (the optative of indirect discourse, or optativus obliquus).

Cite this passage

Plato, Phaedo §97. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg004.humanitext-grc2:97

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.