Humanitext Reader

Herodotus · Histories §7.2.1-7.2.3

Succession dispute between Artobazanes and Xerxes

Passage 1047 of 1577 · Greek

Summary

As Darius prepares for his expedition, a succession dispute arises between his eldest son born before his reign, Artobazanes, and his eldest son born after his accession from Atossa, Xerxes.

§7.2.1στελλομένου δὲ Δαρείου ἐπʼ Αἴγυπτον καὶ Ἀθήνας, τῶν παίδων αὐτοῦ στάσις ἐγένετο μεγάλη περὶ τῆς ἡγεμονίης, ὡς δεῖ μιν ἀποδέξαντα βασιλέα κατὰ τὸν Περσέων νόμον οὕτω στρατεύεσθαι.
While Darius was preparing for an expedition against Egypt and Athens, a great dispute arose among his sons concerning the leadership, since by Persian law he had to declare a king before he could march.
§7.2.2ἦσαν γὰρ Δαρείῳ καὶ πρότερον ἢ βασιλεῦσαι γεγονότες τρεῖς παῖδες ἐκ τῆς προτέρης γυναικός, Γοβρύεω θυγατρός, καὶ βασιλεύσαντι ἐξ Ἀτόσσης τῆς Κύρου ἕτεροι τέσσερες.
For Darius had three sons born to him before he became king by his first wife, the daughter of Gobryas, and four other sons by Atossa, the daughter of Cyrus, after he became king.
τῶν μὲν δὴ προτέρων ἐπρέσβευε Ἀρτοβαζάνης, τῶν δὲ ἐπιγενομένων Ξέρξης.
Of the former, Artobazanes was the eldest, and of the latter, Xerxes.
ἐόντες δὲ μητρὸς οὐ τῆς αὐτῆς ἐστασίαζον, §7.2.3ὁ μὲν Ἀρτοβαζάνης κατότι πρεσβύτατός τε εἴη παντὸς τοῦ γόνου καὶ ὅτι νομιζόμενον εἴη πρὸς πάντων ἀνθρώπων τὸν πρεσβύτατον τὴν ἀρχὴν ἔχειν, Ξέρξης δὲ ὡς Ἀτόσσης τε παῖς εἴη τῆς Κύρου θυγατρὸς καὶ ὅτι Κῦρος εἴη ὁ κτησάμενος τοῖσι Πέρσῃσι τὴν ἐλευθερίην.
As they were not of the same mother, they were in dispute; Artobazanes argued that he was the eldest of all the offspring and that it was the custom among all men for the eldest to hold the rule; while Xerxes argued that he was the son of Atossa, the daughter of Cyrus, and that it was Cyrus who had won freedom for the Persians.

Notes

  1. 7.2.1ἀποδέξαντα — An aorist active participle agreeing with the accusative pronoun μιν (referring to Darius, the subject of the impersonal verb δεῖ). It functions temporally to express 'after having appointed a king.'
  2. 7.2.2βασιλεύσαντι — An aorist active participle in the dative case agreeing with the dative of possession Δαρείῳ. It contrasts with the phrase `πρότερον ἢ βασιλεῦσαι` to mean 'after he had become king.'
  3. 7.2.3νομιζόμενον εἴη — A periphrastic form consisting of the perfect passive participle neuter singular νομιζόμενον and the optative εἴη. It is used in indirect discourse (oblique optative) to represent Artobazanes' claim regarding an established custom.

Cite this passage

Herodotus, Histories §7.2.1-7.2.3. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0016.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:7.2.1-7.2.3

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.