Humanitext Reader

Herodotus · Histories §6.82.1-6.82.2

Cleomenes' Defense at His Trial and Acquittal

Passage 984 of 1577 · Greek

Summary

Upon his return, Cleomenes is prosecuted for failing to capture Argos, but he defends himself by explaining how the sacrificial signs and a flash of fire from the statue of Hera revealed the god's will, leading to his acquittal.

§6.82.1νοστήσαντα δέ μιν ὑπῆγον οἱ ἐχθροὶ ὑπὸ τοὺς ἐφόρους, φάμενοί μιν δωροδοκήσαντα οὐκ ἑλεῖν τὸ Ἄργος, παρεὸν εὐπετέως μιν ἑλεῖν.
Upon his return, his enemies brought Cleomenes before the ephors, claiming that he had taken bribes and failed to capture Argos when it was easy for him to have captured it.
ὁ δέ σφι ἔλεξε, οὔτε εἰ ψευδόμενος οὔτε εἰ ἀληθέα λέγων, ἔχω σαφηνέως εἶπαι, ἔλεξε δʼ ὦν φάμενος, ἐπείτε δὴ τὸ τοῦ Ἄργου ἱρὸν εἷλον, δοκέειν οἱ ἐξεληλυθέναι τὸν τοῦ θεοῦ χρησμόν· πρὸς ὦν ταῦτα οὐ δικαιοῦν πειρᾶν τῆς πόλιος, πρίν γε δὴ ἱροῖσι χρήσηται καὶ μάθῃ εἴτε οἱ ὁ θεὸς παραδιδοῖ εἴτε ἐμποδὼν ἕστηκε·
Whether he was lying or speaking the truth in what he told them, I cannot say for certain, but at any rate he spoke, claiming that when he had captured the sanctuary of Argos, he thought the oracle of the god had been fulfilled for him; therefore, he did not think it right to make an attempt on the city until he should consult the victims and learn whether the god was delivering it to him or standing in his way.
§6.82.2καλλιερευμένῳ δὲ ἐν τῷ Ἡραίῳ ἐκ τοῦ ἀγάλματος τῶν στηθέων φλόγα πυρὸς ἐκλάμψαι, μαθεῖν δὲ αὐτὸς οὕτω τὴν ἀτρεκείην, ὅτι οὐκ αἱρέει τὸ Ἄργος·
But when he was sacrificing to obtain favorable omens in the Heraeum, a flash of fire shone forth from the breast of the statue, and thus he himself knew the exact truth, that he was not to capture Argos.
εἰ μὲν γὰρ ἐκ τῆς κεφαλῆς τοῦ ἀγάλματος ἐξέλαμψε, αἱρέειν ἂν κατʼ ἄκρης τὴν πόλιν, ἐκ τῶν στηθέων δὲ λάμψαντος πᾶν οἱ πεποιῆσθαι ὅσον ὁ θεὸς ἐβούλετο γενέσθαι.
For if it had flashed from the head of the statue, he would have captured the city completely from its heights, but since it shone from the breast, everything that the god wished to happen had been accomplished by him.
ταῦτα λέγων πιστά τε καὶ οἰκότα ἐδόκεε Σπαρτιήτῃσι λέγειν, καὶ διέφυγε πολλὸν τοὺς διώκοντας.
By saying this, he seemed to the Spartans to speak what was credible and reasonable, and he escaped his prosecutors by a wide margin.

Notes

  1. §6.82.1παρεὸν — The neuter accusative singular participle of the impersonal verb πάρεστι (it is possible/permitted). It is used as an accusative absolute, forming an adverbial phrase meaning 'although it was possible to...'.
  2. §6.82.2αἱρέειν ἂν — An infinitive with the particle ἄν in indirect discourse. It represents an indicative past with ἄν (which would be ᾕρει ἄν in direct discourse), serving as the apodosis to the condition `εἰ μὲν γὰρ ἐκ τῆς κεφαλῆς τοῦ ἀγάλματος ἐξέλαμψε`, expressing a past contrary-to-fact condition ('he would have captured').
  3. §6.82.2καλλιερευμένῳ — The dative masculine singular of the present middle participle `καλλιερέομαι` (to sacrifice to obtain favorable omens). This dative functions either temporally to indicate the circumstances, or as a dative of reference/interest with respect to the following infinitive `ἐκλάμψαι`, indicating the person engaged in the sacrifice.

Cite this passage

Herodotus, Histories §6.82.1-6.82.2. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0016.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:6.82.1-6.82.2

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.