§6.53.1ταῦτα μὲν Λακεδαιμόνιοι λέγουσι μοῦνοι Ἑλλήνων· τάδε δὲ κατὰ τὰ λεγόμενα ὑπʼ Ἑλλήνων ἐγὼ γράφω, τούτους τοὺς Δωριέων βασιλέας μέχρι μὲν δὴ Περσέος τοῦ Δανάης, τοῦ θεοῦ ἀπεόντος, καταλεγομένους ὀρθῶς ὑπʼ Ἑλλήνων καὶ ἀποδεικνυμένους ὡς εἰσὶ Ἕλληνες· ἤδη γὰρ τηνικαῦτα ἐς Ἕλληνας οὗτοι ἐτέλεον.
These things indeed the Lacedaemonians alone of the Greeks say; but the following things I write according to what is said by the Greeks, namely, that these kings of the Dorians, up to Perseus the son of Danae (excluding the god), are correctly enumerated by the Greeks and shown to be Greeks; for already by that time they were reckoned among the Greeks.
§6.53.2ἔλεξα δὲ μέχρι Περσέος τοῦδε εἵνεκα, ἀλλʼ οὐκ ἀνέκαθεν ἔτι ἔλαβον, ὅτι οὐκ ἔπεστι ἐπωνυμίη Περσέι οὐδεμία πατρὸς θνητοῦ, ὥσπερ Ἡρακλέι Ἀμφιτρύων.
And I said "up to Perseus" for this reason, and did not trace them from still further back, because there is no surname of a mortal father attached to Perseus, as Amphitryon is to Heracles.
ἤδη ὦν ὀρθῷ χρεωμένῳ μέχρι Περσέος ὀρθῶς εἴρηταί μοι· ἀπὸ δὲ Δανάης τῆς Ἀκρισίου καταλέγοντι τοὺς ἄνω αἰεὶ πατέρας αὐτῶν φαινοίατο ἂν ἐόντες οἱ τῶν Δωριέων ἡγεμόνες Αἰγύπτιοι ἰθαγενέες.
So then, for one who uses correct reasoning, my statement up to Perseus has been correctly made; but if one enumerates their ancestors ever higher from Danae the daughter of Acrisius, the leaders of the Dorians would turn out to be genuine Egyptians.