Humanitext Reader

Plutarch · Comparison of Demosthenes with Cicero §3.1-3.6

Comparison of Public Administration and Attitude toward Wealth

Passage 3 of 5 · Greek

Summary

Contrasts the political power, testing of character in public office, and attitude toward money of Demosthenes and Cicero, highlighting Cicero's integrity in financial matters compared to Demosthenes' financial scandals.

§3.1ἡ μὲν οὖν ἐν τῷ δημηγορεῖν καὶ πολιτεύεσθαι δύναμις ὁμαλῶς ἀμφοτέροις ὑπῆρξεν, ὥστε καὶ τοὺς τῶν ὅπλων καὶ στρατοπέδων κυρίους δεῖσθαι, Δημοσθένους μὲν Χάρητα καὶ Διοπείθην καὶ Λεωσθένην, Κικέρωνος δὲ Πομπήϊον καὶ Καίσαρα τὸν νέον, ὡς αὐτὸς ὁ Καῖσαρ ἐν τοῖς πρὸς Ἀγρίππαν καὶ Μαικήναν ὑπομνήμασιν εἴρηκεν.
Now the power in public speaking and statesmanship belonged equally to both, so that even those who were masters of arms and armies stood in need of them—Chares, Diopithes, and Leosthenes of Demosthenes, and Pompey and the young Caesar of Cicero, as Caesar himself has stated in his memoirs addressed to Agrippa and Maecenas.
§3.2ὃ δὲ δοκεῖ μάλιστα καὶ λέγεται τρόπον ἀνδρὸς ἐπιδεικνύναι καὶ βασανίζειν, ἐξουσία καὶ ἀρχὴ πᾶν πάθος κινοῦσα καὶ πᾶσαν ἀποκαλύπτουσα κακίαν, Δημοσθένει μὲν οὐχ ὑπῆρξεν, οὐδʼ ἔδωκε τοιαύτην διάπειραν ἑαυτοῦ, μηδεμίαν ἀρχὴν τῶν ἐπιφανῶν ἄρξας, ὃς οὐδὲ τῆς ὑφʼ αὑτοῦ συντεταγμένης ἐπὶ Φίλιππον ἐστρατήγησε δυνάμεως·
But that which is especially thought and said to display and test a man's character—power and office, which stir every passion and lay bare every vice—did not belong to Demosthenes, nor did he afford any such trial of himself, having held no office of distinction, he who did not even serve as general of the force organized by himself against Philip.
§3.3Κικέρων δὲ ταμίας εἰς Σικελίαν καὶ ἀνθύπατος εἰς Κιλικίαν καὶ Καππαδοκίαν ἀποσταλείς, ἐν ᾧ καιρῷ τῆς φιλοπλουτίας ἀκμαζούσης, καὶ τῶν πεμπομένων στρατηγῶν καὶ ἡγεμόνων, ὡς τοὺ κλέπτειν ἀγεννοῦς ὄντος, ἐπὶ τὸ ἁρπάζειν τρεπομένων, οὐ τὸ λαμβάνειν ἐδόκει δεινόν, ἀλλʼ ὁ μετρίως τοῦτο ποιῶν ἠγαπᾶτο, πολλὴν μὲν ἐπίδειξιν ὑπεροψίας χρημάτων ἐποιήσατο, πολλὴν δὲ φιλανθρωπίας καὶ χρηστότητος.
But Cicero, having been sent as quaestor to Sicily and as proconsul to Cilicia and Cappadocia at a time when avarice was at its height, and the generals and governors sent out, as if stealing were ignoble, turned to open plunder, so that taking money did not seem shocking, but the one who did so moderately was beloved—at such a time he gave a great demonstration of contempt for money, and a great demonstration of humanity and kindness.
§3.4ἐν αὐτῇ δὲ τῇ Ῥώμῃ λόγῳ μὲν ἀποδειχθεὶς ὕπατος, ἐξουσίαν δὲ λαβὼν αὐτοκράτορος καὶ δικτάτορος ἐπὶ τοὺς περὶ Κατιλίναν, ἐμαρτύρησεν ἅμα τῷ Πλάτωνι μαντευομένῳ παῦλαν ἕξειν κακῶν τὰς πόλεις, ὅταν εἰς ταὐτὸ δύναμίς τε μεγάλη καὶ φρόνησις ἔκ τινος τύχης χρηστῆς ἀπαντήσῃ μετὰ δικαιοσύνης.
In Rome itself, moreover, while nominated consul in name, but receiving the power of a commander-in-chief and dictator against Catiline and his associates, he bore witness to the prophecy of Plato that cities would have a cessation from evils when, by some good fortune, great power and wisdom should meet in the same person together with justice.
§3.5χρηματίσασθαι τοίνυν ἀπὸ τοῦ λόγου Δημοσθένης μὲν ἐπιψόγως λέγεται, λογογραφῶν κρύφα τοῖς περὶ Φορμίωνα καὶ Ἀπολλόδωρον ἀντιδίκοις, καὶ διαβληθεὶς μὲν ἐπὶ τοῖς βασιλικοῖς χρήμασιν, ὀφλὼν δὲ τῶν Ἁρπαλείων.
Now, as for making money from speech, Demosthenes is said to have done so in a blameworthy manner, writing speeches secretly for the opposing litigants Phormio and Apollodorus, and being slandered in connection with the king's money, and convicted in the affair of Harpalus.
εἰ δὲ ταῦτα τοὺς γράφοντας οὐκ ὀλίγοι δʼ εἰσὶν οὗτοι ψεύδεσθαι φαίημεν, §3.6ἀλλʼ ὅτι γε πρὸς δωρεὰς βασιλέων σὺν χάριτι καὶ τιμῇ διδομένας ἀντιβλέψαι Δημοσθένης οὐκ ἂν ἐτόλμησεν, οὐδʼ ἦν τοῦτο ἔργον ἀνθρώπου δανείζοντος ἐπὶ ναυτικοῖς, ἀμήχανον ἀντειπεῖν· περὶ δὲ Κικέρωνος, ὅτι καὶ Σικελιωτῶν ἀγορανομοῦντι καὶ βασιλέως τοῦ Καππαδοκῶν ἀνθυπατεύοντι καὶ τῶν ἐν Ῥώμῃ φίλων, ὅτʼ ἐξέπιπτε τῆς πόλεως, δωρουμένων πολλὰ καὶ δεομένων λαβεῖν ἀντέσχεν, εἴρηται.
But even if we should say that those who write these things—and they are not few—are lying, yet that Demosthenes would not have dared to look in the face of the gifts of kings when offered with favor and honor, nor was this the conduct of a man who lent money on maritime loans, it is impossible to deny; whereas concerning Cicero, it has been told how he held out against the many gifts which the Sicilians offered him when he was aedile, and the king of the Cappadocians when he was proconsul, and his friends in Rome when he was being exiled from the city, though they begged him to accept them.

Notes

  1. §3.1ὥστε καὶ τοὺς τῶν ὅπλων καὶ στρατοπέδων κυρίους δεῖσθαι — The infinitive `δεῖσθαι` ("to need") takes the accusatives `Χάρητα καὶ Διοπείθην...` and `Πομπήϊον...` as its subject, and the genitives `Δημοσθένους` and `Κικέρωνος` as its objects, expressing a clear parallel structure.
  2. §3.2ὃ δὲ δοκεῖ μάλιστα καὶ λέγεται — The relative pronoun `ὃ` is neuter nominative singular, anticipating the feminine subjects `ἐξουσία καὶ ἀρχή` as an appositive clause, introducing the abstract concept before it is formally named.
  3. §3.3ὡς τοῦ κλέπτειν ἀγεννοῦς ὄντος, ἐπὶ τὸ ἁρπάζειν τρεπομένων — Within the main genitive absolute construction `τῶν πεμπομένων στρατηγῶν... τρεπομένων`, another genitive absolute `τοῦ κλέπτειν ἀγεννοῦς ὄντος` is nested, introduced by `ὡς` to denote the subjective reasoning or excuse of the commanders.
  4. §3.6ἀλλʼ ὅτι γε πρὸς δωρεὰς — Serving as the apodosis to the conditional clause `εἰ δὲ ... φαίημεν` in §3.5, the structure `ἀλλ' ὅτι... ἀμήχανον ἀντειπεῖν` asserts "but at least that... it is impossible to deny." The subject of `ἀμήχανον` is the entire `ὅτι` clause.

Cite this passage

Plutarch, Comparison of Demosthenes with Cicero §3.1-3.6. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg056.humanitext-grc2:3.1-3.6

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.