§1.1γεγραμμένων δὲ καὶ περὶ τούτων τῶν ἀξίων μνήμης, ὅλος ὁ τούτου βίος ὅλῳ τῷ θατέρου παρατεθεὶς οὐκ εὐθεώρητον ἔχει τὴν διαφοράν ἐναφανιζομένην πολλαῖς καὶ μεγάλαις ὁμοιότησιν.
Although those things worthy of memory have also been written concerning these men, the entire life of the one, when compared with the entire life of the other, does not present a difference easily discerned, as it is hidden in many great similarities.
εἰ δὲ δεῖ κατὰ μέρος τῇ συγκρίσει διαλαβεῖν ὥσπερ ἔπος ἢ γραφὴν ἑκάτερον, τὸ μὲν ἐξ οὐχ ὑπαρχούσης ἀφορμῆς εἰς πολιτείαν καὶ δόξαν ἀρετῇ καὶ δυνάμει προελθεῖν ἀμφοτέροις κοινόν ἐστι.
But if it is necessary to distinguish each life in detail by comparison, like a poem or a painting, it is common to both of them that, from no pre-existing starting point, they advanced to public life and glory by virtue and power.
§1.2φαίνεται δʼ ὁ μὲν Ἀριστείδης οὔπω τότε μεγάλων οὐσῶν τῶν Ἀθηνῶν καὶ ταῖς οὐσίαις ἔτι συμμέτροις καὶ ὁμαλοῖς ἐπιβαλὼν δημαγωγοῖς καὶ στρατηγοῖς ἐπιφανὴς γενέσθαι· τὸ γὰρ μέγιστον ἦν τίμημα τότε πεντακοσίων μεδίμνων, τὸ δὲ δεύτερον τριακοσίων, ἔσχατον δὲ καὶ τρίτον διακοσίων·
Indeed, Aristides appears to have become illustrious by entering upon the stage of demagogues and generals when Athens was not yet great and when properties were still moderate and uniform; for the highest property assessment then was five hundred medimnoi, the second three hundred, and the last and third two hundred.
§1.3ὁ δὲ Κάτων ἐκ πολίχνης τε μικρᾶς καὶ διαίτης ἀγροίκου δοκούσης φέρων ἀφῆκεν ἑαυτὸν ὥσπερ εἰς πέλαγος ἀχανὲς τὴν ἐν Ῥώμῃ πολιτείαν, οὐκέτι Κουρίων καὶ Φαβρικίων καὶ Ἀτιλίων ἔργον οὖσαν ἡγεμόνων, οὐδʼ ἀπʼ ἀρότρου καὶ σκαφείου πένητας καὶ αὐτουργοὺς ἀναβαίνοντας ἐπὶ τὸ βῆμα προσιεμένην ἄρχοντας καὶ δημαγωγούς, ἀλλὰ πρὸς γένη μεγάλα καὶ πλούτους καὶ νομὰς καὶ σπουδαρχίας ἀποβλέπειν εἰθισμένην, καὶ διʼ ὄγκον ἤδη καὶ δύναμιν ἐντρυφῶσαν τοῖς ἄρχειν ἀξιοῦσιν.
Cato, on the other hand, carrying himself from a tiny town and a rustic way of life that was deemed uncouth, cast himself, as if into a fathomless sea, into the public life of Rome, which was no longer the work of leaders like Curius, Fabricius, and Atilius, nor was it accepting poor self-working farmers rising from the plow and spade to the speaker's platform as consuls and demagogues, but was accustomed to look toward great families, wealth, distributions of money, and office-seeking, and, by reason of its magnitude and power, was already treating with insolence those who aspired to rule.
§1.4οὐκ ἦν δʼ ὅμοιον ἀντιπάλῳ χρῆσθαι Θεμιστοκλεῖ μήτʼ ἀπὸ γένους λαμπρῷ καὶ κεκτημένῳ μέτρια πέντε γὰρ ἢ τριῶν ταλάντων οὐσίαν αὐτῷ γενέσθαι λέγουσιν ὅτε πρῶτον ἥπτετο τῆς πολιτείας καὶ πρὸς Σκηπίωνας Ἀφρικανοὺς καὶ Σερουίους Γάλβας καὶ Κοϊντίους Φλαμινίνους ἁμιλλᾶσθαι περὶ πρωτείων, μηδὲν ὁρμητήριον ἔχοντα πλὴν φωνὴν παρρησιαζομένην ὑπὲρ τῶν δικαίων.
And it was not a similar thing to have Themistocles as an opponent—who was neither of illustrious birth nor possessed of moderate means, for they say his property was five or three talents when he first touched public life—and to contend for the first place against the Scipios Africanus, the Servii Galbae, and the Quintii Flaminini, while having no starting point except a voice speaking frankly on behalf of justice.