Humanitext Reader

Plutarch · Comparison of Theseus and Romulus §5.1-5.2

Filial Devotion and Blame for the Death of Aegeus

Passage 5 of 6 · Greek

Summary

The text contrasts Romulus's devotion and services to his mother and grandfather with Theseus's fatal negligence of the sail, which led to Aegeus's death and prompted apologetic myths by Attic writers.

§5.1καὶ τὸ μὲν Ῥώμου πάθος ἀμφισβητούμενον ἔχει τὸν αὐτόχειρα, καὶ τὸ πλεῖστον εἰς ἑτέρους τῆς αἰτίας τρέπουσι· τὴν δὲ μητέρα διολλυμένην ἔσωσε περιφανῶς, καὶ τὸν πάππον ἀκλεῶς δουλεύοντα καὶ ἀτίμως εἰς τὸν Αἰνείου θρόνον ἐκάθισε, καὶ πολλὰ μὲν ἑκὼν εὐεργέτησεν, ἔβλαψε δὲ αὐτὸν οὐδὲ ἄκων.
And as for the death of Remus, its actual perpetrator is disputed, and people for the most part shift the blame onto others; but Romulus illustriously saved his mother from destruction, and placed his grandfather, who was serving ingloriously and dishonorably, upon the throne of Aeneas, and did him many favors of his own free will, and never harmed him even unintentionally.
§5.2τὴν δὲ Θησέως λήθην καὶ ἀμέλειαν τῆς περὶ τὸ ἱστίον ἐντολῆς μόλις ἂν οἶμαι μακρᾷ τινι παραιτήσει καὶ ἐν ῥᾳθύμοις δικασταῖς αἰτίαν ἀποφυγεῖν πατροκτονίας·
On the other hand, I think that Theseus's forgetfulness and neglect of the command concerning the sail could scarcely, even with some long plea and before indulgent judges, escape the charge of parricide.
ὃ δὴ καὶ συνιδών τις Ἀττικὸς ἀνὴρ ὡς παγχάλεπόν ἐστι βουλομένοις ἀπολογεῖσθαι, πλάττει τὸν Αἰγέα τῆς νεὼς προσφερομένης ὑπὸ σπουδῆς ἀνατρέχοντα πρὸς τὴν ἀκρόπολιν θέας ἕνεκα καὶ σφαλλόμενον καταπεσεῖν, ὥσπερ ὀπαδῶν ἔρημον, ἢ τὴν ἐπὶ θάλατταν ὁδὸν σπεύδοντι μὴ παρούσης τινὸς θεραπείας.
Indeed, a certain Attic writer, recognizing this very point—how extremely difficult it is for those who wish to make a defense—invents the story that, as the ship was approaching, Aegeus in his haste ran up to the Acropolis for a view and, slipping, fell down, as if he were destitute of attendants, or as if there were no companions present for him as he hurried along the road to the sea.

Notes

  1. §5.1ἀμφισβητούμενον ἔχει τὸν αὐτόχειρα — The verb ἔχει takes τὸν αὐτόχειρα as its direct object and the neuter singular predicate adjective ἀμφισβητούμενον (referring to the general dispute), meaning 'has its perpetrator as a matter of dispute' (i.e., the identity of the perpetrator is disputed).
  2. §5.2τὴν δὲ Θησέως λήθην καὶ ἀμέλειαν — This accusative phrase functions as the subject of the infinitive ἀποφυγεῖν in the accusative-and-infinitive construction governed by οἶμαι, making the abstract nouns 'forgetfulness and neglect' the grammatical subject of the clause.
  3. §5.2σπεύδοντι — Dative present participle of σπεύδω. Breaking the accusative concord with ἔρημον (referring to Aegeus), it functions as a dative of relation connected with the absolute genitive clause μὴ παρούσης τινὸς θεραπείας ('there being no attendants present for him as he hurried').

Cite this passage

Plutarch, Comparison of Theseus and Romulus §5.1-5.2. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg003.humanitext-grc2:5.1-5.2

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.