Humanitext Reader

Thucydides · History of the Peloponnesian War §8.68.1-8.68.4

Leaders of the Coup and the Difficulty of Overthrow

Passage 876 of 917 · Greek

Summary

The author praises the exceptional abilities and backgrounds of the primary leaders behind the oligarchical revolution—Pisander, Antiphon, Phrynichus, and Theramenes—and reflects on the immense difficulty of stripping liberty from the Athenians, who had been free and ruling others for nearly a century.

§8.68.1ἦν δὲ ὁ μὲν τὴν γνώμην ταύτην εἰπὼν Πείσανδρος, καὶ τἆλλα ἐκ τοῦ προφανοῦς προθυμότατα ξυγκαταλύσας τὸν δῆμον·
The one who proposed this motion was Pisander, who also in other respects was most forward in openly helping to overthrow the democracy.
ὁ μέντοι ἅπαν τὸ πρᾶγμα ξυνθεὶς ὅτῳ τρόπῳ κατέστη ἐς τοῦτο καὶ ἐκ πλείστου ἐπιμεληθεὶς Ἀντιφῶν ἦν ἀνὴρ Ἀθηναίων τῶν καθ’ ἑαυτὸν ἀρετῇ τε οὐδενὸς ὕστερος καὶ κράτιστος ἐνθυμηθῆναι γενόμενος καὶ ἃ γνοίη εἰπεῖν, καὶ ἐς μὲν δῆμον οὐ παριὼν οὐδ’ ἐς ἄλλον ἀγῶνα ἑκούσιος οὐδένα, ἀλλ’ ὑπόπτως τῷ πλήθει διὰ δόξαν δεινότητος διακείμενος, τοὺς μέντοι ἀγωνιζομένους καὶ ἐν δικαστηρίῳ καὶ ἐν δήμῳ πλεῖστα εἷς ἀνήρ, ὅστις ξυμβουλεύσαιτό τι, δυνάμενος ὠφελεῖν. §8.68.2καὶ αὐτός τε, ἐπειδὴ † μετέστη ἡ δημοκρατία καὶ ἐς ἀγῶνας κατέστη † τὰ τῶν τετρακοσίων ἐν ὑστέρῳ μεταπεσόντα ὑπὸ τοῦ δήμου ἐκακοῦτο †, ἄριστα φαίνεται τῶν μέχρι ἐμοῦ ὑπὲρ αὐτῶν τούτων αἰτιαθείς, ὡς ξυγκατέστησε, θανάτου δίκην ἀπολογησάμενος. §8.68.3παρέσχε δὲ καὶ ὁ Φρύνιχος ἑαυτὸν πάντων διαφερόντως προθυμότατον ἐς τὴν ὀλιγαρχίαν, δεδιὼς τὸν Ἀλκιβιάδην καὶ ἐπιστάμενος εἰδότα αὐτὸν ὅσα ἐν τῇ Σάμῳ πρὸς τὸν Ἀστύοχον ἔπραξε, νομίζων οὐκ ἄν ποτε αὐτὸν κατὰ τὸ εἰκὸς ὑπ’ ὀλιγαρχίας κατελθεῖν· πολύ τε πρὸς τὰ δεινά, ἐπειδήπερ ὑπέστη, φερεγγυώτατος ἐφάνη. §8.68.4καὶ Θηραμένης ὁ τοῦ Ἅγνωνος ἐν τοῖς ξυγκαταλύουσι τὸν δῆμον πρῶτος ἦν, ἀνὴρ οὔτε εἰπεῖν οὔτε γνῶναι ἀδύνατος.
But the one who planned the whole affair, as to how it should be brought to this point, and who had given it the longest attention, was Antiphon, a man who among the Athenians of his own day was second to none in ability, and had proved himself best both at conceiving a plan and at expressing his decisions. He did not come forward before the people, nor voluntarily enter any other public contest, but was regarded with suspicion by the multitude because of his reputation for cleverness; yet he was the one man who was best able to assist those who were contending in the courts or before the assembly, if any of them came to him for advice. And he himself, when the democracy was overthrown, and the affairs of the Four Hundred later met with a reverse and were hard pressed by the people in trials, being accused of this very thing—that he had helped to set it up—appears to have made the best defence on a capital charge of any man up to my time. Phrynichus also showed himself beyond all others most zealously devoted to the oligarchy, because he feared Alcibiades and was aware that the latter knew of all his intrigues at Samos with Astyochus, thinking that in all probability Alcibiades would never be recalled by an oligarchy; and after he had once embarked upon the enterprise, he showed himself by far the most reliable in facing dangers. Theramenes also, the son of Hagnon, was foremost among those who helped to overthrow the democracy, a man of no mean ability either in speech or in judgment.
ὥστε ἀπ’ ἀνδρῶν πολλῶν καὶ ξυνετῶν πραχθὲν τὸ ἔργον οὐκ ἀπεικότως καίπερ μέγα ὂν προυχώρησεν· χαλεπὸν γὰρ ἦν τὸν Ἀθηναίων δῆμον ἐπ’ ἔτει ἑκατοστῷ μάλιστα ἐπειδὴ οἱ τύραννοι κατελύθησαν ἐλευθερίας παῦσαι, καὶ οὐ μόνον μὴ ὑπήκοον ὄντα, ἀλλὰ καὶ ὑπὲρ ἥμισυ τοῦ χρόνου τούτου αὐτὸν ἄλλων ἄρχειν εἰωθότα.
Consequently, the enterprise, being conducted by many able and intelligent men, not unnaturally succeeded, great though it was; for it was a difficult task to deprive the Athenian people of their liberty, nearly a hundred years after the expulsion of the tyrants, and that too when they had not only been free from subjection to others, but had themselves been accustomed to rule over others for more than half of that period.

Notes

  1. 8.68.1κράτιστος ἐνθυμηθῆναι γενόμενος καὶ ἃ γνοίη εἰπεῖν — The infinitives `ἐνθυμηθῆναι` and `εἰπεῖν` function as epexegetical infinitives (limiting or specifying) modifying the adjective `κράτιστος` ("best at conceiving... and at expressing..."). `ἃ γνοίη` is a relative clause with the optative mood, representing a general or repeated conception of what he might decide.
  2. 8.68.1τοὺς μέντοι ἀγωνιζομένους ... δυνάμενος ὠφελεῖν — The participle `δυνάμενος` is in the nominative, agreeing with the subject Antiphon, and links back to the earlier `Ἀντιφῶν ἦν` to form the predicate ("was able to assist"). `τοὺς ἀγωνιζομένους` (those contending) is the direct object of the infinitive `ὠφελεῖν`, with the conditional relative clause `ὅστις ξυμβουλεύσαιτό τι` (whoever might seek advice) embedded within.
  3. 8.68.2ἐπειδὴ † μετέστη ἡ δημοκρατία ... ἐκακοῦτο † — This passage contains corrupt text (indicated by cruces †) with conflicting verbs (`κατέστη`, `ἐκακοῦτο`) and structural shifts. Contextually, it is interpreted as a temporal clause introduced by `ἐπειδή` describing the transition: "when the democracy was overthrown, and the affairs of the Four Hundred later suffered a reverse and were brought into difficulty/trials by the people."
  4. 8.68.4τὸν Ἀθηναίων δῆμον ... ἐλευθερίας παῦσαι — The subject of the infinitive `παῦσαι` (to stop, to deprive), introduced by the impersonal adjective `χαλεπόν` (it was difficult), is contextually "they" (the oligarchs). The accusative `τὸν Ἀθηναίων δῆμον` is the direct object of `παῦσαι`, and the genitive `ἐλευθερίας` is a genitive of separation ("to deprive of liberty").

Cite this passage

Thucydides, History of the Peloponnesian War §8.68.1-8.68.4. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0003.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:8.68.1-8.68.4

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.