[PAPINIANUS libro septimo quaestionum. ] §8.2.36.prBinas quis aedes habebat una contignatione tectas: utrasque diuersis legauit.
[PAPINIANUS, in the seventh book of Questions.] A certain person owned two buildings covered by a single flooring structure; he bequeathed both to different persons.
dixi, quia magis placeat tignum posse duorum esse ita, ut certae partes cuiusque sint contignationis, ex regione cuiusque domini fore tigna nec ullam inuicem habituros actionem ius non esse immissum habere: nec interest, pure utrisque an sub condicione alteri aedes legatae sint.
I gave the opinion that, since it is more approved that a beam can belong to two persons in such a way that specific parts of the flooring belong to each, the beams will belong to each owner according to his own territory, and they will not have any action against each other to the effect that there is no right to have [the beam] inserted; and it makes no difference whether the buildings were bequeathed to both unconditionally, or to one of them under a condition.