[IDEM libro septimo decimo ad Plautium. ] §6.1.47.prHaec si res praesens sit: si absens, tunc cum possessionem eius possessor nactus sit ex uoluntate actoris: et ideo non est alienum non aliter litem aestimari a iudice, quam si cauerit actor, quod per se non fiat possessionem eius rei non traditum iri.
[THE SAME in the seventeenth book on Plautius.] These things apply if the thing is present; if it is absent, then only when the possessor has obtained possession of it by the will of the plaintiff. And therefore, it is not unreasonable for the judge to estimate the value of the suit only if the plaintiff has given security that it will not be due to his own act that the possession of that thing is not delivered.