[ULPIANUS libro septimo decimo ad edictum. ] §6.1.41.prSi quis hac lege emerit, ut, si alius meliorem condicionem attulerit, recedatur ab emptione, post allatam condicionem iam non potest in rem actione uti.
[ULPIAN, in the seventeenth book on the Edict.] If anyone has purchased under the condition that, if another person should bring a better offer, the purchase shall be rescinded, after the better offer has been brought, he can no longer use an action in rem.
sed et si cui in diem addictus sit fundus, antequam adiectio sit facta, uti in rem actione potest: postea non poterit.
But also, if a tract of land has been provisionally assigned to someone, before an addition to the price is made, he can use an action in rem, but afterwards he will not be able to do so.
§6.1.41.1Si seruus mihi uel filius familias fundum uendidit et tradidit habens liberam peculii administrationem, in rem actione uti potero.
If a slave or a filius familias, having the free administration of his peculium, has sold and delivered a tract of land to me, I will be able to use an action in rem.
sed et si domini uoluntate domini rem tradat, idem erit dicendum: quemadmodum cum procurator uoluntate domini uendidit uel tradidit, in rem actionem mihi praestabit.
But also, if he delivers the owner’s property by the will of the owner, the same must be said; just as when a procurator has sold or delivered by the will of the owner, he will afford me an action in rem.