Humanitext Reader

Justinian I · The Digest of Justinian §5.1.12.pr-5.1.12.3

Authority to Appoint Judges and Grounds for Disqualification

Passage 893 of 9271 · Latin

Summary

This chunk explains who has the authority to appoint a judge based on law, constitution, decree, or custom, and lists those disqualified by nature, law, or custom, noting that family status does not affect eligibility.

[PAULUS libro septimo decimo ad edictum. ] §5.1.12.prCum praetor unum ex pluribus iudicare uetat, ceteris id committere uidetur.
[PAULUS in the seventeenth book on the Edict.] When the praetor forbids one of several persons to act as judge, he is deemed to entrust it to the others.
§5.1.12.1Iudicem dare possunt, quibus hoc lege uel constitutione uel senatus consulto conceditur.
Those to whom this is granted by law, constitution, or decree of the senate can appoint a judge.
lege, sicut proconsuli.
By law, as for example, a proconsul.
is quoque cui mandata est iurisdictio iudicem dare potest: ut sunt legati proconsulum.
He also to whom jurisdiction has been delegated can appoint a judge: as are the legates of proconsuls.
item hi quibus id more concessum est propter uim imperii, sicut praefectus urbi ceterique Romae magistratus.
Likewise, those to whom this has been granted by custom on account of the power of their imperium, as for example, the prefect of the city and the other magistrates of Rome.
§5.1.12.2Non autem omnes iudices dari possunt ab his qui iudicis dandi ius habent: quidam enim lege impediuntur ne iudices sint, quidam natura, quidam moribus.
However, not all persons can be appointed as judges by those who have the right to appoint a judge; for some are prevented by law, some by nature, and some by custom, from being judges.
natura, ut surdus mutus: et perpetuo furiosus et impubes, quia iudicio carent.
By nature, such as a deaf person, a mute; and a person who is perpetually insane, and a minor, because they lack judgment.
lege impeditur, qui senatu motus est.
A person who has been expelled from the senate is prevented by law.
moribus feminae et serui, non quia non habent iudicium, sed quia receptum est, ut ciuilibus officiis non fungantur.
By custom, women and slaves, not because they lack judgment, but because it has been accepted that they should not perform civil offices.
§5.1.12.3Qui possunt esse iudices, nihil interest in potestate an sui iuris sint.
With respect to those who can be judges, it makes no difference whether they are under power or are independent.

Notes

  1. §5.1.12.2iudicio — Here, iudicium refers to 'judgment' or 'power of discernment' rather than 'a trial' or 'a court'. This is evident from the context where minors and the insane cannot be judges because they lack rational capacity. It is also consistent with the subsequent phrase non quia non habent iudicium regarding women and slaves.
  2. §5.1.12.2receptum est, ut ciuilibus officiis non fungantur — The ut-clause functions as the subject of the impersonal passive receptum est ('it has been accepted/established that...'). The verb fungor (to perform/discharge) takes the ablative case (ciuilibus officiis).
  3. §5.1.12.3Qui possunt esse iudices, nihil interest in potestate an sui iuris sint — The opening clause Qui possunt esse iudices grammatically functions as a relative clause with an omitted genitive demonstrative (e.g., eorum), acting as the topic of the sentence. The indirect question in potestate an sui iuris sint ('whether they are under power or independent') serves as the subject of nihil interest ('it makes no difference').

Cite this passage

Justinian I, The Digest of Justinian §5.1.12.pr-5.1.12.3. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:5.1.12.pr-5.1.12.3

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.