[ULPIANUS libro undecimo ad edictum. ] §4.3.13.prHeredibus tamen harum personarum, item aduersus heredes de dolo actio erit danda.
[ULPIAN, book eleven on the Edict.] However, the action on fraud shall be granted to the heirs of these persons, and likewise against their heirs.
§4.3.13.1Item in causae cognitione uersari Labeo ait, ne in pupillum de dolo detur actio, nisi forte nomine hereditario conueniatur.
Likewise, Labeo says that it depends on the judicial inquiry into the case that an action on fraud is not to be granted against a ward, unless by chance he is sued in his capacity as an heir.
ego arbitror et ex suo dolo conueniendum, si proximus pubertati est, maxime si locupletior ex hoc factus est.
I think that he should also be sued on account of his own fraud, if he is close to puberty, especially if he has been made richer by this.