[PAULUS libro decimo ad edictum. ] §3.6.7.prSi quis ab alio acceperit pecuniam ne mihi negotium faciat, si quidem mandatu meo datum est, uel a procuratore meo omnium rerum, uel ab eo qui negotium meum gerere uolebat et ratum habui: ego dedisse intellegor.
[PAULUS, on the Edict, book 10] If anyone has accepted money from another so that he may not cause trouble to me, if indeed it was given by my mandate, or by my general procurator, or by one who wished to manage my affair and whose act I ratified: I am understood to have given it.
si autem non mandatu meo alius ei licet misericordiae causa dederit ne fiat neque ratum habui, tunc et ipsum repetere et me in quadruplum agere posse.
But if, not by my mandate, another has given it to him (even if for the sake of compassion) so that it may not happen, and I have not ratified it, then both he himself can sue for its return and I can bring an action for fourfold.
§3.6.7.1Si ut filio familias negotium fieret acceptum est, etiam patri actio danda est.
If money has been accepted so that trouble might be caused to a son-in-power, an action must also be given to the father.
item si filius familias pecuniam acceperit, ut faceret negotium uel non faceret, in ipsum iudicium dabitur: et si alius non meo mandatu ei dederit ne fiat, tunc etiam ipsum repetere et me in quadruplum agere posse.
Likewise, if a son-in-power has accepted money in order to cause or not to cause trouble, an action shall be given against him himself; and if another, not by my mandate, has given it to him so that it might not happen, then both he himself can sue for its return and I can bring an action for fourfold.
§3.6.7.2Cum publicanus mancipia retineret dataque ei pecunia esset quae non deberetur, et ipse ex hac parte edicti in factum actione tenetur.
When a tax-collector detained slaves and money was paid to him which was not owed, he himself also is held by an action on the facts under this part of the Edict.