[SCAEUOLA libro primo responsorum. ] §3.3.70.prPater filio suo pupillo tutorem dedit Sempronium creditorem suum: is administrata tutela reliquit fratrem suum heredem, qui et ipse decessit et per fideicommissum nomen debitoris Titio reliquit eique mandatae sunt actiones ab heredibus: quaero, cum tam tutelae actio quam pecuniae creditae ex hereditate Sempronii descendant, an non aliter mandata actio ei detur, quam si defendat heredes, a quibus ei actiones mandatae sunt.
[SCAEUOLA in the first book of Opinions.] A father appointed his creditor Sempronius as tutor to his pupil son. This man, after administering the guardianship, left his brother as his heir; who himself also died, and by a fideicommissum left the debt of the debtor to Titius, and the actions were mandated to Titius by the heirs. I ask, since both the action of guardianship and the action for loaned money derive from the inheritance of Sempronius, whether the mandated action should not be granted to him otherwise than if he defends the heirs by whom the actions were mandated to him.
respondi debere defendere.
I answered that he ought to defend them.