[ULPIANUS libro sexagensimo ad edictum. ] §3.3.51.prMinor uiginti quinque annis si defensor existat, ex quibus causis in integrum restitui possit, defensor idoneus non est, quia et ipsi et fideiussoribus eius per in integrum restitutionem succurritur.
[ULPIANUS in the sixtieth book on the edict.] If a person under twenty-five years of age appears as a defender, since there are grounds on which he can be restored to his original position, he is not a suitable defender, because relief is given through restoration to the original position both to himself and to his sureties.
§3.3.51.1Quoniam tamen defendere est eandem uicem quam reus subire, defensor mariti in amplius quam maritus facere possit non est condemnandus.
Since, however, to defend is to undergo the same position as the defendant, a husband's defender ought not to be condemned in an amount greater than what the husband himself is able to pay.
§3.3.51.2Is qui suscepit defensionem, etsi locupletissimus sit,
He who has undertaken a defense, even if he be extremely wealthy,