[IDEM libro secundo responsorum. ] §2.8.14.prFilius familias defendit absentem patrem: quaero an iudicatum solui satisdare debeat.
[THE SAME, in the second book of Responses.] A son under paternal power defends his absent father: I ask whether he must give security that the judgment will be satisfied.
Paulus respondit eum qui absentem defendit, etiam si filius uel pater sit, satisdare petituro ex forma edicti debere.
Paulus replied that he who defends an absent person, even if he is a son or a father, must give security to the claimant in accordance with the terms of the Edict.