[PAULUS libro primo quaestionum. ] §2.4.15.prLibertus aduersus patronum dedit libellum non dissimulato se libertum esse eius: an si ad desiderium eius rescribatur, etiam edicti poena remissa esse uidetur? respondi non puto ad hunc casum edictum praetoris pertinere.
[PAULUS, in the first book of Questions.] A freedman presented a petition against his patron without concealing the fact that he was his freedman: if a rescript is issued in response to his request, is the penalty of the edict also considered to be remitted? I replied: "I do not think that the praetor's edict applies to this case.
neque enim qui libellum principi uel praesidi dat, in ius uocare patronum uidetur.
For he who presents a petition to the emperor or the governor is not considered to summon his patron to court."