Humanitext Reader

Justinian I · The Digest of Justinian §17.1.16.pr

Mandate on the Mandatary's Property and Expense Recovery

Passage 2456 of 9271 · Latin

Summary

Ulpian discusses the validity of a mandate to perform an action on the mandatary's own property, citing Celsus' opinion that the mandatary can recover expenses in excess of the appreciation of his property by an action on mandate.

[ULPIANUS libro trigensimo primo ad edictum. ] §17.1.16.prSi quis mihi mandauerit in meo aliquid facere et fecero, quaesitum est, an sit mandati actio.
[ULPIANUS in his thirty-first book on the Edict.] If anyone should mandate me to do something on my own property and I have done it, it has been questioned whether there is an action on mandate.
et ait Celsus libro septimo digestorum hoc respondisse se, cum Aurelius Quietus hospiti suo medico mandasse diceretur, ut in hortis eius quos Rauennae habebat, in quos omnibus annis secedere solebat, sphaeristerium et hypocausta et quaedam ipsius ualetudini apta sua inpensa faceret: deducto igitur, quanto sua aedificia pretiosiora fecisset, quod amplius impendisset posse eum mandati iudicio persequi.
And Celsus says in the seventh book of his Digests that he gave this answer, when Aurelius Quietus was said to have mandated his host, a doctor, to build at his own expense, in the host's gardens which he had at Ravenna, into which Quietus was accustomed to retire every year, a ball-court and hot-baths and certain things suitable for his own health: therefore, after deducting how much more valuable he had made his own buildings, he could sue by an action on mandate for what he had spent in excess.

Notes

  1. §17.1.16.prin meo — The possessive pronoun meo (my) is used substantively in the neuter ablative, with an implied noun such as praedio (estate) or solō (ground/land), meaning "on my own property/land."
  2. §17.1.16.prdeducto — This is an ablative absolute construction where the perfect participle deducto (having been deducted) takes the following indirect question clause quanto sua aedificia pretiosiora fecisset ("how much more valuable he had made his own buildings") as its substantive subject.
  3. §17.1.16.prquod amplius impendisset — A relative clause with an omitted antecedent (such as id), functioning as the direct object of the infinitive persequi in indirect speech, referring to "what he had spent in excess."

Cite this passage

Justinian I, The Digest of Justinian §17.1.16.pr. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:17.1.16.pr

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.