Humanitext Reader

Justinian I · The Digest of Justinian §11.1.4.pr-11.1.4.1

Binding Effect of Court Answers and Definition of Court

Passage 1750 of 9271 · Latin

Summary

Ulpian explains that the praetor intended to bind defendants by their court answers to establish their inheritance shares, and further defines what constitutes "in court" for such interrogations.

[ULPIANUS libro uicensimo secundo ad edictum. ] §11.1.4.prUoluit praetor adstringere eum qui conuenitur ex sua in iudicio responsione, ut uel confitendo uel mentiendo sese oneret, simul etiam portionis, pro qua quisque heres extitit, ex interrogatione certioretur.
[ULPIANUS, from the twenty-second book on the Edict.] The praetor wished to bind the person who is sued by his own response in court, so that he might burden himself either by confessing or by lying, and at the same time might also be made certain by the interrogation of the share for which each person stood as heir.
§11.1.4.1Quod ait praetor: 'qui in iure interrogatus responderit' sic accipiendum est apud magistratus populi Romani uel praesides prouinciarum uel alios iudices: ius enim eum solum locum esse, ubi iuris dicendi uel iudicandi gratia consistat, uel si domi uel itinere hoc agat.
What the praetor says: "who, having been interrogated in court, has answered" is to be understood as being before the magistrates of the Roman people, or the governors of the provinces, or other judges; for "court" is only that place where they stand for the purpose of administering justice or judging, even if they do this at home or on a journey.

Notes

  1. 11.1.4.prportionis... certioretur — certioretur is the third-person singular subjunctive passive of certioro (to make certain, inform), and its grammatical subject is eum qui conuenitur (the person sued), consistent with sese oneret. The verb certiorari means "to be informed of, made certain of," taking a genitive of the thing informed (here, portionis, "of the share"). It expresses that the defendant is made to realize or confirm their share through the interrogation.
  2. 11.1.4.1ius enim eum solum locum esse — An accusative and infinitive construction introducing an explanation after accipiendum est. ius is the accusative subject of esse. eum is a demonstrative adjective modifying locum ("that sole place"). The pronoun hoc in hoc agat refers to iuris dicendi uel iudicandi (administering justice or judging).

Cite this passage

Justinian I, The Digest of Justinian §11.1.4.pr-11.1.4.1. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:11.1.4.pr-11.1.4.1

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.