[IULIANUS libro quarto ad Urseium Ferocem. ] §11.1.18.prQui ex parte dimidia heres erat cum absentem coheredem suum defendere uellet, ut satisdationis onus euitare possit, respondit se solum heredem esse et condemnatus est: quaerebat actor, cum ipse soluendo non esset, an rescisso superiore iudicio in eum, qui re uera heres erat, actio dari deberet.
[JULIANUS, from the fourth book on Urseius Ferox.] A person who was an heir to a half share, wishing to defend his absent co-heir, answered that he was the sole heir in order to avoid the burden of giving security, and was condemned. The plaintiff, since that person was insolvent, asked whether, the former judgment having been rescinded, an action ought to be granted against him who was in truth the heir.
Proculus respondit rescisso iudicio posse agi, idque est uerum.
Proculus replied that, the judgment being rescinded, an action could be brought, and that is true.