Livy · History of Rome §8.17.1-8.17.12
Sidicine War, the Interregnum, and New Tribes
Summary
The narrative covers the new consuls' invasion of Sidicine territory, the appointment of a dictator who soon abdicates due to a religious flaw, and the subsequent interregnum. It also details rumors of Gallic and Samnite unrest, the intervention of King Alexander of Epirus in southern Italy, the creation of two new tribes after a census, and the granting of citizenship without suffrage to Acerrae.
Notes
- 8.17.2dimicaturi ... videbantur — The nominative future active participle dimicaturi serves as a predicative complement to the imperfect passive/deponent verb videbantur, expressing intention or imminent action ('they seemed about to fight'). This personal construction is used instead of the impersonal accusative-with-infinitive construction.
- 8.17.4vitio eos creatos — An accusative-and-infinitive clause with the subject accusative eos and the perfect participle creatos [esse], explaining the content of the religious scruple (religio). The noun vitio is an ablative of manner, meaning 'with a defect' (ritual flaw).
- 8.17.4velut omnibus eo vitio contactis auspiciis — An ablative absolute construction (omnibus auspiciis contactis) introduced by the particle velut ('as if'). The phrase eo vitio ('by that defect') acts as an ablative of instrument/cause modifying contactis.
- 8.17.6pro tumultu — The preposition pro here means 'as equivalent to' or 'with the force of'. The noun tumultus refers to a sudden emergency or uprising (particularly a Gallic invasion requiring military mobilization), indicating that the rumor was treated with the same gravity as an actual emergency.
- 8.17.9Samnites bellum Alexandri Epirensis in Lucanos traxit — The subject of the singular verb traxit is the noun bellum (the war of Alexander), while the object is the accusative plural Samnites. Note the inverted word order: it is not the Samnites who drew the war, but the war that drew the Samnites away.
- 8.17.10incertum qua fide culturus, si perinde cetera processissent — An indirect question dependent on the omitted incertum [est] ('it is uncertain'). The future active participle culturus implies culturus [esset] ('with what fidelity he would have observed'). The conditional clause si ... processissent is in the pluperfect subjunctive, representing a past contrary-to-fact condition ('if his other affairs had prospered accordingly').
Cite this passage
Livy, History of Rome §8.17.1-8.17.12. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.humanitext-lat2:8.17.1-8.17.12
Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.
Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.