Humanitext Reader

Julius Caesar · Gallic War §8.21.1-8.21.4

Flight of Commius and Bellovaci Pleas for Surrender

Passage 370 of 404 · Latin

Summary

With the plan approved, Commius fled to Germany, while the remaining Bellovaci sent envoys to Caesar to sue for peace, admitting heavy losses but presenting the death of the instigator Correus as a relief.

§8.21.1Hoc omnibus probato consilio Commius Atrebas ad eos confugit Germanos, a quibus ad id bellum auxilia mutuatus erat.
This plan being approved by all, Commius the Atrebatian fled to those Germans from whom he had borrowed auxiliaries for that war.
§8.21.2Ceteri e vestigio mittunt ad Caesarem legatos petuntque, ut ea poena sit contentus hostium, quam si sine dimicatione inferre integris posset, pro sua clementia atque humanitate numquam profecto esset illaturus.
The rest immediately send ambassadors to Caesar and beg that he would be satisfied with that punishment of his enemies, which, even if he could have inflicted it without a battle upon them while they were still unharmed, he would certainly never have inflicted in accordance with his clemency and humanity.
§8.21.3Adflictas opes equestri proelio Bellovacorum esse; delectorum peditum multa milia interisse, vix refugisse nuntios caedis.
They pleaded that the power of the Bellovaci had been shattered by the cavalry battle; that many thousands of their select infantry had perished, and that scarcely any messengers of the slaughter had escaped.
§8.21.4Tamen magnum ut in tanta calamitate Bellovacos eo proelio commodum esse consecutos, quod Correus, auctor belli, concitator multitudinis, esset interfectus. Numquam enim senatum tantum in civitate illo vivo quantum imperitam plebem potuisse.
Nevertheless, they said that the Bellovaci had obtained a great advantage in that battle, as far as was possible in so great a calamity, in that Correus, the author of the war and exciter of the multitude, had been slain; for during his lifetime, the senate had never been able to possess as much power in the state as the ignorant populace.

Notes

  1. 8.21.2ut ea poena sit contentus hostium, quam... — ea poena is the antecedent of the relative pronoun quam. hostium (of the enemy, i.e., of themselves) modifies poena. The conditional clause si... posset... esset illaturus is in the subjunctive due to subordinate clause in indirect speech (within the ut-clause), expressing a subjunctive counterfactual notion ('such punishment as he would never have inflicted... even if he could have').
  2. 8.21.4ut in tanta calamitate — ut is used in a restrictive or concessive sense ('considering...', 'as in...'), meaning 'considering such a great calamity' or 'as far as was possible in such a great disaster', modifying the phrase magnum commodum.
  3. 8.21.4illo vivo — An ablative absolute construction consisting of the pronoun illo (referring to Correus) and the adjective vivo, meaning 'while he was alive' or 'during his lifetime' without a participle.

Cite this passage

Julius Caesar, Gallic War §8.21.1-8.21.4. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:latinLit:phi0448.phi001.humanitext-lat2:8.21.1-8.21.4

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.