Humanitext Reader

Aristotle · Politics §6.1316b-6.1317a

Combinations of Constitutional Parts and Democratic Principles

Passage 110 of 155 · Greek

Summary

Having discussed the parts of constitutions and their preservation and destruction, the author points out how different combinations of these parts create various mixed constitutions. He then begins examining the characteristics of various democracies and their primary hypothesis, which is freedom, to explain how to construct and reform them.

§6.1316bπόσαι μὲν οὖν διαφοραὶ καὶ τίνες τοῦ τε βουλευτικοῦ καὶ κυρίου τῆς πολιτείας καὶ τῆς περὶ τὰς ἀρχὰς τάξεως καὶ περὶ δικαστηρίων, καὶ ποία πρὸς ποίαν συντέτακται πολιτείαν, ἔτι δὲ περὶ φθορᾶς τε καὶ σωτηρίας τῶν πολιτειῶν, ἐκ ποίων τε γίνεται καὶ διὰ τίνας αἰτίας, εἴρηται πρότερον·
Now, how many and what differences there are in the deliberative and sovereign part of the constitution, the arrangement concerning offices, and the courts, and what kind of constitution is coordinated with what kind, and furthermore, concerning the destruction and preservation of constitutions, from what things they come about and through what causes, has been stated before.
ἐπεὶ δὲ τετύχηκεν εἴδη πλείω δημοκρατίας ὄντα καὶ τῶν ἄλλων ὁμοίως πολιτειῶν, ἅμα τε περὶ ἐκείνων εἴ τι λοιπόν, οὐ χεῖρον ἐπισκέψασθαι, καὶ τὸν οἰκεῖον καὶ τὸν συμφέροντα τρόπον ἀποδοῦναι πρὸς ἑκάστην.
But since it happens that there are multiple forms of democracy and likewise of the other constitutions, it is not worse at the same time to inspect if there is anything left concerning them, and to render the appropriate and advantageous way to each.
ἔτι δὲ καὶ τὰς συναγωγὰς αὐτῶν τῶν εἰρημένων ἐπισκεπτέον πάντων τῶν τρόπων· §6.1317aταῦτα γὰρ συνδυαζόμενα ποιεῖ τὰς πολιτείας ἐπαλλάττειν, ὥστε ἀριστοκρατίας τε ὀλιγαρχικὰς εἶναι καὶ πολιτείας δημοκρατικωτέρας.
And furthermore, the combinations of all these spoken ways must also be inspected, for these being conjoined make the constitutions overlap, so that there are oligarchical aristocracies and more democratic polities.
λέγω δὲ τοὺς συνδυασμοὺς οὓς δεῖ μὲν ἐπισκοπεῖν, οὐκ ἐσκεμμένοι δʼ εἰσὶ νῦν, οἷον ἂν τὸ μὲν βουλευόμενον καὶ τὸ περὶ τὰς ἀρχαιρεσίας ὀλιγαρχικῶς ᾖ συντεταγμένον, τὰ δὲ περὶ τὰ δικαστήρια ἀριστοκρατικῶς, ἢ ταῦτα μὲν καὶ τὸ περὶ τὸ βουλευόμενον ὀλιγαρχικῶς, ἀριστοκρατικῶς δὲ τὸ περὶ τὰς ἀρχαιρεσίας, ἢ κατʼ ἄλλον τινὰ τρόπον μὴ πάντα συντεθῇ τὰ τῆς πολιτείας οἰκεῖα.
And I mean the conjunctions which must be inspected but have not been examined now, such as if the deliberative part and the part concerning elections of offices are organized in an oligarchical way, while the part concerning the courts is aristocratic, or these and the deliberative part are oligarchical, but the part concerning elections of offices is aristocratic, or if in some other way not all the peculiar elements of the constitution are combined in the same way.
ποία μὲν οὖν δημοκρατία πρὸς ποίαν ἁρμόττει πόλιν, ὡσαύτως δὲ καὶ ποία τῶν ὀλιγαρχιῶν ποίῳ πλήθει, καὶ τῶν λοιπῶν δὲ πολιτειῶν τίς συμφέρει τίσιν, εἴρηται πρότερον·
Now, what kind of democracy fits what kind of city, and likewise what kind of oligarchies fits what kind of multitude, and which of the remaining constitutions is advantageous to whom, has been stated before.
ὅμως δʼ ἐπεὶ δεῖ γενέσθαι δῆλον μὴ μόνον ποία τούτων τῶν πολιτειῶν ἀρίστη ταῖς πόλεσιν, ἀλλὰ καὶ πῶς δεῖ κατασκευάζειν καὶ ταύτας καὶ τὰς ἄλλας, ἐπέλθωμεν συντόμως.
Nevertheless, since it must become clear not only what kind of these constitutions is best for cities, but also how one must construct both these and the others, let us go through them briefly.
καὶ πρῶτον περὶ δημοκρατίας εἴπωμεν· ἅμα γὰρ καὶ περὶ τῆς ἀντικειμένης πολιτείας φανερόν, αὕτη δʼ ἐστὶν ἣν καλοῦσί τινες ὀλιγαρχίαν.
And first let us speak about democracy; for at the same time it will also make clear about the opposite constitution, and this is what some call oligarchy.
ληπτέον δὲ πρὸς ταύτην τὴν μέθοδον πάντα τὰ δημοτικὰ καὶ τὰ δοκοῦντα ταῖς δημοκρατίαις ἀκολουθεῖν· ἐκ γὰρ τούτων συντιθεμένων τὰ τῆς δημοκρατίας εἴδη γίνεσθαι συμβαίνει, καὶ πλείους δημοκρατίας μιᾶς εἶναι καὶ διαφόρους.
And one must take for this method all the democratic elements and those that seem to follow democracies; for from these being combined it happens that the forms of democracy come into being, and that democracies are more than one and different.
δύο γάρ εἰσιν αἰτίαι διʼ ἅσπερ αἱ δημοκρατίαι πλείους εἰσί, πρῶτον μὲν ἡ λεχθεῖσα πρότερον, ὅτι διάφοροι οἱ δῆμοι (γίνεται γὰρ τὸ μὲν γεωργικὸν πλῆθος, τὸ δὲ βάναυσον καὶ θητικόν· ὧν τοῦ πρώτου τῷ δευτέρῳ προσλαμβανομένου, καὶ τοῦ τρίτου πάλιν τοῖς ἀμφοτέροις, οὐ μόνον διαφέρει τῷ βελτίω καὶ χείρω γίνεσθαι τὴν δημοκρατίαν, ἀλλὰ καὶ τῷ μὴ τὴν αὐτήν), δευτέρα δὲ περὶ ἧς νῦν λέγομεν.
For there are two causes because of which democracies are multiple: first, the one stated before, that the multitudes (demos) are different (for there is the agricultural multitude, the artisan, and the laboring; and when the second is added to the first, and again the third to both, it differs not only in that the democracy becomes better or worse, but also in that it is not the same), and second, the one about which we are speaking now.
τὰ γὰρ ταῖς δημοκρατίαις ἀκολουθοῦντα καὶ δοκοῦντʼ εἶναι τῆς πολιτείας οἰκεῖα ταύτης ποιεῖ συντιθέμενα τὰς δημοκρατίας ἑτέρας· τῇ μὲν γὰρ ἐλάττω, τῇ δʼ ἀκολουθήσει πλείονα, τῇ δʼ ἅπαντα ταῦτα.
For those things that follow democracies and seem to be peculiar to this constitution make, when combined, different democracies; for to one fewer of these will follow, to another more, and to another all of them.
χρήσιμον δʼ ἕκαστον αὐτῶν γνωρίζειν πρός τε τὸ κατασκευάζειν ἣν ἄν τις αὐτῶν τύχῃ βουλόμενος, καὶ πρὸς τὰς διορθώσεις.
And it is useful to recognize each of them both for constructing whichever of them one happens to want, and for corrections.
ζητοῦσι μὲν γὰρ οἱ τὰς πολιτείας καθιστάντες ἅπαντα τὰ οἰκεῖα συναγαγεῖν πρὸς τὴν ὑπόθεσιν, ἁμαρτάνουσι δὲ τοῦτο ποιοῦντες, καθάπερ ἐν τοῖς περὶ τὰς φθορὰς καὶ τὰς σωτηρίας τῶν πολιτειῶν εἴρηται πρότερον.
For those who establish constitutions seek to collect all the peculiar elements for their hypothesis, but they err in doing this, just as has been stated before in the discussions concerning the destructions and preservations of constitutions.
νυνὶ δὲ τὰ ἀξιώματα καὶ τὰ ἤθη καὶ ὧν ἐφίενται λέγωμεν.
But now let us state their principles, characters, and what they aim at.
ὑπόθεσις μὲν οὖν τῆς δημοκρατικῆς πολιτείας ἐλευθερία (τοῦτο γὰρ λέγειν εἰώθασιν, ὡς ἐν μόνῃ τῇ πολιτείᾳ ταύτῃ μετέχοντας ἐλευθερίας·
Now, the hypothesis of the democratic constitution is freedom (for they are accustomed to say this, on the ground that in this constitution alone they share in freedom;

Notes

  1. 1316bτοῦ τε βουλευτικού καὶ κυρίου τῆς πολιτείας — The single article `τοῦ` is shared by both `βουλευτικού` and `κυρίου`, indicating that the deliberative and sovereign functions are closely associated or form a single administrative body in the constitution. `τῆς πολιτείας` (of the constitution) serves as a genitive dependent on both substantives, or specifically on `κυρίου`.
  2. 1316bτετύχηκεν εἴδη πλείω δημοκρατίας ὄντα — The perfect tense verb `τετύχηκεν` (from `τυγχάνω`) combined with the present participle `ὄντα` (from `εἰμί`). Rather than implying a chance occurrence ('happens to be'), this construction serves to emphasize the objective reality that multiple forms of democracy 'actually exist.'
  3. 1317aοἷον ἂν ... μὴ πάντα συντεθῇ — The comparative conjunction `οἷον` followed by the conditional particle `ἂν` and the subjunctive (`ᾖ`, `συντεθῇ`) forms a general present conditional relative clause. This construction introduces a hypothetical, illustrative scenario: 'such as if... the elements are not combined.'
  4. 1317aὧν τοῦ πρώτου τῷ δευτέρῳ προσλαμβανομένου — Inside the relative clause introduced by the relative pronoun in the genitive `ὧν` (referring to the different kinds of multitudes), a genitive absolute construction `τοῦ πρώτου ... προσλαμβανομένου` (present passive participle) is embedded. `τοῦ πρώτου` (the first group, i.e., agricultural) is the logical subject of the genitive absolute, which is 'joined by' the dative `τῷ δευτέρῳ` (the second group).
  5. 1317aὡς ἐν μόνῃ τῇ πολιτείᾳ ταύτῃ μετέχοντας ἐλευθερίας — The particle `ὡς` combined with the accusative participle `μετέχοντας` forms an accusative absolute-like structure, or functions as an appositive to an implied accusative subject representing the citizens. It introduces a subjective claim or rationalization ('on the ground that in this constitution alone they share in freedom') rather than an objective statement of fact.

Cite this passage

Aristotle, Politics §6.1316b-6.1317a. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0086.tlg035.humanitext-grc2:6.1316b-6.1317a

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.