- Source
- Seneca, Lucius Annaeus. Ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales, Vol 1-3. Gummere, Richard Mott, editor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann, Ltd., 1917-1925.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.5-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:latinLit:phi1017.phi015.humanitext-lat2:94.36-94.45
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-11-07
Seneca discusses the efficacy of laws, philosophy, and personal association with wise individuals, demonstrating how admonition and practical precepts effectively guide and improve the human soul.
Nemo," inquit," praeceptis curat insaniam; ergo ne malitiam quidem." Dissimile est. Nam si insaniam sustuleris, sanitas redit, at si falsas opiniones exclusimus, non statim sequitur dispectus rerum agendarum. Ut sequatur,1 tamen admonitio conroborabit rectam de bonis malisque sententiam. Illud quoque falsum est, nihil apud insanos proficere praecepta. Nam quemadmodum sola non prosunt, sic curationem adiuvant. Et denuntiatio et castigatio insanos coercuit. De illis nunc insanis loquor, quibus mens mota est, non erepta.
’No one,’ he says, ‘cures madness with precepts; therefore, not wickedness either.’ It is different. For if you remove madness, health returns, but if we have shut out false opinions, the discernment of things to be done does not immediately follow. Even if it should follow, nevertheless admonition will strengthen the correct opinion about goods and evils. That is also false, that precepts benefit nothing among the mad. For just as they do not benefit alone, so they assist the cure. Both warning and chastisement have restrained the mad. I am speaking now of those madmen whose mind is disturbed, not snatched away.
" Leges," inquit, "ut faciamus, quod oportet, non efficiunt, et quid aliud sunt quam minis mixta praecepta? "Primum omnium ob hoc illae non persuadent, quia minantur, at haec non cogunt, sed exorant. Deinde leges a scelere deterrent, praecepta in officium adhortantur. His adice quod leges quoque proficiunt ad bonos mores, utique si non tantum imperant, sed docent.
’Laws,’ he says, ‘do not bring it about that we do what we ought, and what else are they than precepts mixed with threats?’ First of all, they do not persuade for this reason, because they threaten, but the latter do not compel, but win over. Next, laws deter from crime, precepts exhort to duty. To these add that laws also benefit good morals, especially if they do not only command, but teach.
In hac re dissentio a Posidonio, qui "inprobo," inquit, "quod Platonis legibus adiecta principia sunt. Legem enim brevem esse oportet, quo facilius2 ab imperitis teneatur. Velut emissa divinitus vox sit; iubeat, non disputet. Nihil videtur mihi frigidius, nihil ineptius quam lex cum prologo. Mone, dic, quid me velis fecisse; non disco, sed pareo." Proficiunt vero; itaque malis moribus uti videbis civitates usas malis legibus. "At non apud omnis proficiunt."
In this matter I dissent from Posidonius, who says, ‘I disapprove that principles (prefaces) have been added to Plato’s laws. For a law ought to be short, so that it may be more easily grasped by the unlearned. Let it be like a voice sent from heaven; let it command, not dispute. Nothing seems to me colder, nothing more inept than a law with a prologue. Warn, say what you wish me to have done; I do not learn, but obey.’ Yet they do benefit; and so you will see that states which have used bad laws have used bad morals. ‘But they do not benefit among all.’
Ne philosophia quidem; nec ideo inutilis et formandis animis inefficax est. Quid autem? Philosophia non vitae lex est? Sed putemus non proficere leges; non ideo sequitur, ut ne monitiones quidem proficiant. Aut sic et consolationes nega proficere dissuasionesque et adhortationes et obiurgationes et laudationes. Omnia ista monitionum genera sunt. Per ista ad perfectum animi statum pervenitur.
Not even philosophy does; yet it is not therefore useless and ineffective in forming minds. What then? Is not philosophy the law of life? But let us suppose that laws do not benefit; it does not therefore follow that not even admonitions benefit. Or else, deny that consolations also benefit, and dissuasions, and exhortations, and rebukes, and praises. All those are kinds of admonitions. Through those, one arrives at the perfect state of the mind.
Nulla res magis animis honesta induit dubiosque et in pravum inclinabiles revocat ad rectum quam bonorum virorum conversatio. Paulatim enim descendit in pectora, et vim praeceptorum obtinet frequenter aspici, frequenter audiri. Occursus mehercules ipse sapientium iuvat, et est aliquid, quod ex magno, viro vel tacente proficias.
No thing clothes minds with honorable things and recalls those who are doubtful and inclinable to evil to the right path more than the conversation of good men. For it gradually descends into the breast, and to be frequently seen, to be frequently heard, obtains the force of precepts. By Hercules, the very meeting with wise men helps, and there is something that you may benefit from a great man even when he is silent.
Nec tibi facile dixerim3 quemadmodum prosit, sicut illud intellego profuisse. "Minuta quaedam," ut ait Phaedon, "animalia cum mordent non sentiuntur; adeo tenuis illis et fallens in periculum vis est. Tumor indicat morsum et in ipso tumore nullum vulnus apparet. Idem tibi in conversatione virorum sapientium eveniet: non deprehendes, quemadmodum aut quando tibi prosit, profuisse deprendes."
Nor could I easily tell you how it benefits, just as I understand that that other thing benefited. ‘Certain minute,’ as Phaedo says, ‘animals when they bite are not felt; so thin and deceptive into danger is their power. A swelling indicates the bite, and in the swelling itself no wound appears. The same will happen to you in the conversation of wise men: you will not perceive how or when it benefits you, but you will perceive that it has benefited.’
Quorsus, inquis, hoc pertinet? Aeque praecepta bona, si saepe tecum sint, profutura quam bona exempla. Pythagoras ait alium animum fieri intrantibus4 templum deorumque simulacra ex vicino cernentibus et alicuius oraculi opperientibus vocem.
’Whither,’ you say, ‘does this point?’ Just as good precepts, if they are often with you, will benefit as much as good examples. Pythagoras says that a different mind is made in those entering a temple and beholding the statues of the gods from nearby and waiting for the voice of some oracle.
Quis autem negabit feriri quibusdam praeceptis, efficaciter etiam inperitissimos? Velut his brevissimis vocibus, sed multum habentibus ponderis:" Nil nimis. Avarus animus nullo satiatur lucro. Ab alio exspectes, alteri quod feceris. "Haec cum ictu quodam audimus, nec ulli licet dubitare aut interrogare "quare?"; adeo etiam sine ratione ipsa veritas ducit.
But who will deny that some are struck by certain precepts, effectively even the most unlearned? As by these shortest words, yet having much weight: ‘Nothing in excess.’ ‘A greedy mind is satisfied by no gain.’ ‘Expect from another what you have done to the other.’ We hear these with a certain shock, nor is it permitted to anyone to doubt or ask ‘why?’; so much does truth itself lead even without a reason.
Si reverentia frenat animos ac vitia compescit, cur non et admonitio idem possit? Si inponit pudorem castigatio, cur admonitio non faciat, etiam si nudis praeceptis utitur? Illa vero efficacior est et altius penetrat, quae adiuvat ratione quod praecipit, quae adicit, quare quidque faciendum sit et quis facientem oboedientemque praeceptis fructus exspectet. Si imperio proficitur, et admonitione; atqui proficitur imperio; ergo et admonitione.
If reverence curbs minds and restrains vices, why should not admonition also be able to do the same? If chastisement imposes shame, why should admonition not do so, even if it uses bare precepts? But that indeed is more effective and penetrates deeper, which assists with reason what it prescribes, which adds why each thing is to be done and what fruit awaits the one who does it and obeys the precepts. If it is benefited by command, also by admonition; but it is benefited by command; therefore also by admonition.
In duas partes virtus dividitur, in contemplationem veri et actionem. Contemplationem institutio tradit, actionem admonitio. Virtutem et exercet et ostendit recta actio. Acturo autem si prodest qui suadet, et qui monet proderit. Ergo si recta actio virtuti necessaria est, rectas autem actiones admonitio demonstrat, et admonitio necessaria est.
Virtue is divided into two parts, into the contemplation of truth and action. Instruction delivers contemplation, admonition action. Right action both exercises and shows virtue. But if he who persuades benefits the one about to act, he who admonishes will also benefit. Therefore, if right action is necessary for virtue, and admonition points out right actions, admonition also is necessary.
- 94.36Ut sequatur
The conjunction ut with the present subjunctive sequatur is used here in a concessive sense ('even if it should follow', 'granted that it follows'), which is reinforced by tamen in the main clause.
- 94.38quo facilius
In a purpose clause containing a comparative (here the adverb facilius), the conjunction quo (derived from the ablative of the relative pronoun) is regularly used instead of ut. Thus quo facilius means 'in order that it may be more easily...'.
- 94.41dixerim
The first-person singular perfect subjunctive. It functions as a potential subjunctive (subjunctive of modest assertion), expressing a softened statement: 'I could not easily tell' or 'I would not easily say'.
- 94.42intrantibus
The dative plural of the present participle. This dative functions as a dative of reference or interest, denoting the persons in whom the mental change occurs ('a different mind is made in/for those entering...'), and is in apposition with cernentibus and opperientibus.
Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-25) · Revision history (1, latest 2026-09-21)
- 2026-09-21 AI review — source 1
