← Plato

Theaetetus

§191

The Metaphor of the Wax Tablet and Memory

Socrates suggests that their previous agreement on the impossibility of false opinion was incorrect, and introduces the famous metaphor of the 'waxen block' in the soul to explain the process of memory and recognition.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§191

ΣΩ. οὐκ ἐρῶ σοι πρὶν ἂν πανταχῇ πειραθῶ σκοπῶν. αἰσχυνοίμην γὰρ ἂν ὑπὲρ ἡμῶν, ἐν ᾧ ἀποροῦμεν, ἀναγκαζομένων1 ὁμολογεῖν οἷα λέγω. ἀλλʼ ἐὰν εὕρωμεν καὶ ἐλεύθεροι γενώμεθα, τότʼ ἤδη περὶ τῶν ἄλλων ἐροῦμεν ὡς πασχόντων αὐτὰ ἐκτὸς τοῦ γελοίου ἑστῶτες· ἐὰν δὲ πάντῃ ἀπορήσωμεν, ταπεινωθέντες οἶμαι τῷ λόγῳ παρέξομεν2 ὡς ναυτιῶντες πατεῖν τε καὶ χρῆσθαι ὅτι ἂν βούληται. ᾗ οὖν ἔτι πόρον τινὰ εὑρίσκω τοῦ ζητήματος ἡμῖν, ἄκουε. ΘΕΑΙ. λέγε μόνον. ΣΩ. οὐ φήσω ἡμᾶς ὀρθῶς ὁμολογῆσαι, ἡνίκα ὡμολογήσαμεν ἅ τις οἶδεν, ἀδύνατον δοξάσαι ἃ μὴ οἶδεν εἶναι αὐτὰ καὶ ψευσθῆναι·3 ἀλλά πῃ δυνατόν. ΘΕΑΙ. ἆρα λέγεις ὃ καὶ ἐγὼ τότε ὑπώπτευσα, ἡνίκʼ αὐτὸ ἔφαμεν τοιοῦτον εἶναι, ὅτι ἐνίοτʼ ἐγὼ γιγνώσκων Σωκράτη, πόρρωθεν δὲ ὁρῶν ἄλλον ὃν οὐ γιγνώσκω, ᾠήθην εἶναι Σωκράτη ὃν οἶδα; γίγνεται γὰρ δὴ ἐν τῷ τοιούτῳ οἷον λέγεις. ΣΩ. οὐκοῦν ἀπέστημεν αὐτοῦ, ὅτι ἃ ἴσμεν ἐποίει ἡμᾶς εἰδότας μὴ εἰδέναι; ΘΕΑΙ. πάνυ μὲν οὖν. ΣΩ. μὴ γὰρ οὕτω τιθῶμεν, ἀλλʼ ὧδε· ἴσως πῃ ἡμῖν συγχωρήσεται, ἴσως δὲ ἀντιτενεῖ. ἀλλὰ γὰρ ἐν τοιούτῳ ἐχόμεθα, ἐν ᾧ ἀνάγκη πάντα μεταστρέφοντα λόγον βασανίζειν. σκόπει οὖν εἰ τὶ λέγω. ἆρα ἔστιν μὴ εἰδότα τι πρότερον ὕστερον μαθεῖν; ΘΕΑΙ. ἔστι μέντοι. ΣΩ. οὐκοῦν καὶ αὖθις ἕτερον καὶ ἕτερον; ΘΕΑΙ. τί δʼ οὔ; ΣΩ. θὲς δή μοι λόγου ἕνεκα ἐν ταῖς ψυχαῖς ἡμῶν ἐνὸν κήρινον ἐκμαγεῖον, τῷ μὲν μεῖζον, τῷ δʼ ἔλαττον, καὶ τῷ μὲν καθαρωτέρου κηροῦ, τῷ δὲ κοπρωδεστέρου, καὶ σκληροτέρου, ἐνίοις δὲ ὑγροτέρου, ἔστι δʼ οἷς μετρίως ἔχοντος. ΘΕΑΙ. τίθημι. ΣΩ. δῶρον τοίνυν αὐτὸ φῶμεν εἶναι τῆς τῶν Μουσῶν μητρὸς Μνημοσύνης, καὶ εἰς τοῦτο ὅτι ἂν βουληθῶμεν μνημονεῦσαι ὧν ἂν ἴδωμεν ἢ ἀκούσωμεν ἢ αὐτοὶ ἐννοήσωμεν, ὑπέχοντας αὐτὸ4 ταῖς αἰσθήσεσι καὶ ἐννοίαις, ἀποτυποῦσθαι, ὥσπερ δακτυλίων σημεῖα ἐνσημαινομένους· καὶ ὃ μὲν ἂν ἐκμαγῇ, μνημονεύειν τε καὶ ἐπίστασθαι ἕως ἂν ἐνῇ τὸ εἴδωλον αὐτοῦ· ὃ δʼ ἂν ἐξαλειφθῇ ἢ μὴ οἷόν τε γένηται ἐκμαγῆναι, ἐπιλελῆσθαί τε καὶ μὴ ἐπίστασθαι. ΘΕΑΙ. ἔστω οὕτως. ΣΩ. ὁ τοίνυν ἐπιστάμενος μὲν αὐτά, σκοπῶν δέ τι ὧν ὁρᾷ ἢ ἀκούει, ἄθρει εἰ ἄρα τοιῷδε τρόπῳ ψευδῆ ἂν δοξάσαι. ΘΕΑΙ. ποίῳ δή τινι; ΣΩ. ἃ οἶδεν, οἰηθεὶς εἶναι τοτὲ μὲν ἃ οἶδε, τοτὲ δὲ ἃ μή.5 ταῦτα γὰρ ἐν τοῖς πρόσθεν οὐ καλῶς ὡμολογήσαμεν ὁμολογοῦντες ἀδύνατα. ΘΕΑΙ. νῦν δὲ πῶς λέγεις;

​SOCRATES: I will not tell you until I have tried examining in every way. For I should be ashamed on our behalf, while we are in difficulties, if we were forced to admit the sort of things I am saying. But if we find a way out and become free, then at last we shall speak of others as experiencing these things, standing ourselves outside of the ridiculous; but if we are completely baffled, then, humbled, I suppose we shall yield ourselves to the argument, like seasick people, to be trampled upon and treated however it wishes. Listen, then, to how I still find some way out of the inquiry for us. THEAETETUS: Just speak. SOCRATES: I will say that we did not agree correctly when we agreed that it is impossible for someone to opine what he does not know as being those things which he knows, and so to be mistaken; rather, it is in some way possible. THEAETETUS: Do you mean what I too suspected at that time, when we said it was of that sort, namely that sometimes I, knowing Socrates, but seeing from afar another whom I do not know, thought him to be Socrates whom I know? For it does indeed happen in such a case as you describe. SOCRATES: Did we not, then, reject it, because it made us who know the things we know not know them? THEAETETUS: Certainly indeed. SOCRATES: For let us not set it down in that way, but as follows: perhaps in some way we shall be agreed with, but perhaps we shall be resisted. However, we are held in such a state that it is necessary to turn every argument upside down and test it. Examine, then, if I am saying anything. Is it possible for one who does not know something earlier to learn it later? THEAETETUS: Yes, indeed. SOCRATES: And again, another thing and another? THEAETETUS: Why not? SOCRATES: Set down for me, then, for the sake of the argument, that there is in our souls a waxen block, in one person larger, in another smaller, and in one of purer wax, in another of more muddy and harder, in some of wetter, and in some of moderate quality. THEAETETUS: I set it down. SOCRATES: Let us say, then, that this is a gift of Memory, the mother of the Muses, and that into this, whatever we wish to remember of what we see or hear or think of ourselves, we imprint, holding it under our senses and thoughts, just as we stamp the marks of rings; and that whatever is imprinted, we remember and know as long as its image is in it; but whatever is erased or cannot be imprinted, we have forgotten and do not know. THEAETETUS: Let it be so. SOCRATES: One, then, who knows these things, but is examining something of what he sees or hears, watch if indeed he might opine falsely in such a way. THEAETETUS: In what sort of way, indeed? SOCRATES: By thinking that the things he knows are at one time the things he knows, and at another time the things he does not. For we did not agree correctly in our previous agreement when we said these things were impossible. THEAETETUS: But how do you say it now?

Syntax notes5 items
  1. 191ἀναγκαζομένων

    The genitive participle ἀναγκαζομένων agrees with the preceding ἡμῶν (part of ὑπὲρ ἡμῶν), rather than forming a grammatically independent genitive absolute. It modifies ἡμῶν attributively: 'of us, who are in difficulties and are forced to admit...'

  2. 191aπαρέξομεν

    Used intransitively here with the omission of the reflexive pronoun ἑαυτούς ('we shall yield/present ourselves'). The subsequent infinitives πατεῖν τε καὶ χρῆσθαι express result or purpose ('to be trampled upon and treated').

  3. 191aἅ τις οἶδεν, ἀδύνατον δοξάσαι ἃ μὴ οἶδεν εἶναι αὐτὰ καὶ ψευσθῆναι

    This complex accusative-and-infinitive construction serves as the content of the previous agreement. ἀδύνατον [εἶναι] is the predicate, and the subject is the infinitive δοξάσαι. Within this, ἃ μὴ οἶδεν is the object of the thinking, and εἶναι αὐτά ('to be those very things [which one knows]') is the predicative complement, where αὐτά refers back to ἅ τις οἶδεν.

  4. 191dὑπέχοντας αὐτό

    The accusative plural participle ὑπέχοντας ('holding under') agrees with the omitted subject of the infinitive construction (such as ἡμᾶς 'us' or people in general). αὐτό is the neuter singular accusative pronoun referring back to ἐκμαγεῖον (the waxen block).

  5. 191eἃ οἶδεν, οἰηθεὶς εἶναι τοτὲ μὲν ἃ οἶδε, τοτὲ δὲ ἃ μή

    The accusative ἃ οἶδεν ('the things he knows') is placed at the beginning of the explanation for emphasis. It serves as the object of the mental action described by the participle οἰηθείς ('thinking/supposing [them] to be...'), where he mistakes the things he knows (ἃ οἶδεν) for what he knows (ἃ οἶδε) or what he does not know (ἃ μή).

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-22)urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg006.humanitext-grc2:191