← Plato

Theaetetus

§192

Classification of Cases Where False Opinion Can Occur

Socrates systematically lists cases where it is logically impossible to opine falsely by confusing objects of knowledge, perception, or their absence, and points out the remaining cases where error is possible; as Theaetetus struggles to follow, Socrates begins to clarify the point using the concrete example of their own acquaintance and perception.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§192

ΣΩ. δεῖ ὧδε λέγεσθαι περὶ αὐτῶν ἐξ ἀρχῆς διοριζομένους ὅτι ὃ μέν τις οἶδεν,1 σχὼν αὐτοῦ μνημεῖον ἐν τῇ ψυχῇ, αἰσθάνεται δὲ αὐτὸ μή, οἰηθῆναι ἕτερόν τι ὧν οἶδεν, ἔχοντα καὶ ἐκείνου τύπον, αἰσθανόμενον δὲ μή, ἀδύνατον. καὶ ὅ γε οἶδεν αὖ, οἰηθῆναι εἶναι ὃ μὴ οἶδε μηδʼ ἔχει αὐτοῦ σφραγῖδα· καὶ ὃ μὴ οἶδεν, ὃ μὴ οἶδεν αὖ· καὶ ὃ μὴ οἶδεν, ὃ οἶδε· καὶ ὃ αἰσθάνεταί γε, ἕτερόν τι ὧν αἰσθάνεται οἰηθῆναι εἶναι· καὶ ὃ αἰσθάνεται, ὧν τι μὴ αἰσθάνεται· καὶ ὃ μὴ αἰσθάνεται, ὧν μὴ αἰσθάνεται· καὶ ὃ μὴ αἰσθάνεται, ὧν αἰσθάνεται. καὶ ἔτι γε αὖ καὶ ὃ οἶδε καὶ αἰσθάνεται καὶ ἔχει τὸ σημεῖον κατὰ τὴν αἴσθησιν, οἰηθῆναι αὖ ἕτερόν τι ὧν οἶδε καὶ αἰσθάνεται καὶ ἔχει αὖ καὶ ἐκείνου τὸ σημεῖον κατὰ τὴν αἴσθησιν, ἀδυνατώτερον ἔτι ἐκείνων, εἰ οἷόν τε. καὶ ὃ οἶδε καὶ αἰσθάνεται ἔχων τὸ μνημεῖον ὀρθῶς, ὃ οἶδεν οἰηθῆναι ἀδύνατον· καὶ ὃ οἶδε καὶ αἰσθάνεται ἔχων κατὰ ταὐτά, ὃ αἰσθάνεται· καὶ ὃ αὖ μὴ οἶδε μηδὲ αἰσθάνεται, ὃ μὴ οἶδε μηδὲ αἰσθάνεται· καὶ ὃ μὴ οἶδε μηδὲ αἰσθάνεται, ὃ μὴ οἶδε· καὶ ὃ μὴ οἶδε μηδὲ αἰσθάνεται, ὃ μὴ αἰσθάνεται· πάντα ταῦτα ὑπερβάλλει ἀδυναμίᾳ τοῦ ἐν αὐτοῖς ψευδῆ τινα δοξάσαι. λείπεται δὴ ἐν τοῖς τοιοῖσδε, εἴπερ που ἄλλοθι, τὸ τοιοῦτον γενέσθαι. ΘΕΑΙ. ἐν τίσι δή; ἐὰν ἄρα ἐξ αὐτῶν τι μᾶλλον μάθω· νῦν μὲν γὰρ οὐχ ἕπομαι. ΣΩ. ἐν οἷς οἶδεν, οἰηθῆναι αὐτὰ ἕτερʼ ἄττα εἶναι2 ὧν οἶδε καὶ αἰσθάνεται· ἢ ὧν μὴ οἶδεν, αἰσθάνεται δέ· ἢ ὧν οἶδε καὶ αἰσθάνεται, ὧν οἶδεν αὖ καὶ αἰσθάνεται. ΘΕΑΙ. νῦν πολὺ πλέον ἀπελείφθην ἢ τότε. ΣΩ. ὧδε δὴ ἀνάπαλιν ἄκουε. ἐγὼ εἰδὼς Θεόδωρον καὶ ἐν ἐμαυτῷ μεμνημένος οἷός ἐστι, καὶ Θεαίτητον κατὰ ταὐτά, ἄλλο τι ἐνίοτε μὲν ὁρῶ αὐτούς, ἐνίοτε δὲ οὔ, καὶ ἅπτομαί ποτʼ αὐτῶν, τοτὲ δʼ οὔ, καὶ ἀκούω ἤ τινα ἄλλην αἴσθησιν αἰσθάνομαι, τοτὲ δʼ αἴσθησιν μὲν οὐδεμίαν ἔχω περὶ ὑμῶν, μέμνημαι δὲ ὑμᾶς οὐδὲν ἧττον καὶ ἐπίσταμαι αὐτὸς ἐν ἐμαυτῷ; ΘΕΑΙ. πάνυ μὲν οὖν. ΣΩ. τοῦτο τοίνυν πρῶτον μάθε ὧν βούλομαι δηλῶσαι, ὅτι ἔστι μὲν ἃ οἶδε μὴ αἰσθάνεσθαι, ἔστιν δὲ αἰσθάνεσθαι. ΘΕΑΙ. ἀληθῆ. ΣΩ. οὐκοῦν καὶ ἃ μὴ οἶδε, πολλάκις μὲν ἔστι μηδὲ αἰσθάνεσθαι, πολλάκις δὲ αἰσθάνεσθαι μόνον; ΘΕΑΙ. ἔστι καὶ τοῦτο.

SOCRATES: It must be stated in this way about them, distinguishing from the beginning, that for one to think that what he knows—having the memory of it in his soul, but not perceiving it—is some other thing of the things he knows—having also the imprint of that, but not perceiving it—is impossible. And again, to think that what he knows is what he does not know and of which he has no seal; and what he does not know, to be what he does not know; and what he does not know, to be what he knows; and what he perceives, to think it is some other thing of the things he perceives; and what he perceives, to be some of the things he does not perceive; and what he does not perceive, to be some of the things he does not perceive; and what he does not perceive, to be some of the things he perceives. And still further, again, to think that what he knows and perceives, and of which he holds the sign corresponding to the perception, is some other thing of the things he knows and perceives, and of which he holds in turn the sign of that other corresponding to the perception, is even more impossible than those, if that were possible. And to think that what he knows and perceives, having the memory correctly, is what he knows is impossible; and what he knows and perceives, having it in the same way, to be what he perceives; and again, what he does not know nor perceive, to be what he does not know nor perceive; and what he does not know nor perceive, to be what he does not know; and what he does not know nor perceive, to be what he does not perceive. All these cases exceed in the impossibility of anyone opining falsely in them. It remains, then, in the following cases, if indeed anywhere else, for such a thing to occur. THEAETETUS: In which, indeed? If perhaps I might learn something more from them; for now I am not following. SOCRATES: In those things which he knows, to think that they are some other things of those he knows and perceives; or of those which he does not know, but perceives; or of those which he knows and perceives, to be some of those he knows in turn and perceives. THEAETETUS: Now I am left behind much more than before. SOCRATES: Listen, then, back again in this way. Do I, knowing Theodorus and remembering in myself what sort of person he is, and Theaetetus in the same way, sometimes indeed see them, and sometimes not, and sometimes touch them, and sometimes not, and hear them or perceive some other perception, and at other times have indeed no perception about you, but remember you none the less and know you in myself? THEAETETUS: Certainly indeed. SOCRATES: Learn this first, then, of what I wish to show: that it is possible for one not to perceive what he knows, and it is possible to perceive it. THEAETETUS: True. SOCRATES: Is it not also the case that what he does not know, it is often possible not even to perceive, but often possible only to perceive? THEAETETUS: This is also so.

Syntax notes2 items
  1. 192aδεῖ ὧδε λέγεσθαι... ὅτι ὃ μέν τις οἶδεν...

    The impersonal verb δεῖ takes the infinitive λέγεσθαι, which is followed by a ὅτι clause. The main predicate of this ὅτι clause is ἀδύνατον (with ἐστι omitted), and its subject is the infinitive οἰηθῆναι. This complex accusative-and-infinitive structure introduces a vast list of statements about what is impossible to opine.

  2. 192cἐν οἷς οἶδεν, οἰηθῆναι αὐτὰ ἕτερʼ ἄττα εἶναι...

    This passage describes the only cases where false opinion can occur. It begins with ἐν οἷς referring back to the antecedent τοῖς τοιοῖσδε (in such cases). The pronoun αὐτὰ (the things he knows) acts as the subject accusative of the infinitive οἰηθῆναι. The three subsequent clauses represent parallel structures of thinking one class of things to be another class of things denoted by attraction of relative pronouns (ὧν = ἐκείνων ἃ).

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-22)urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg006.humanitext-grc2:192