← Diogenes Laertius

Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers

§9.7.40-9.7.44

Anecdotes, Death, and Physical Doctrines of Democritus

The passage recounts traditions surrounding Democritus, including Plato's hostility to his books, chronological calculations of his birth, anecdotes with Hippocrates, and his death during the Thesmophoria, concluding with a summary of his atomic physics.

← PrevNext →

ὁ δὲ Δημήτριος τοὺς συγγενέας αὐτοῦ φησιν ἀναγνῶναι τὸν Μέγαν διάκοσμον, ὃν μόνον ἑκατὸν ταλάντων τιμηθῆναι. ταὐτὰ δὲ καὶ Ἱππόβοτός φησιν. Ἀριστόξενος δʼ ἐν τοῖς Ἱστορικοῖς ὑπομνήμασί φησι Πλάτωνα θελῆσαι συμφλέξαι τὰ Δημοκρίτου συγγράμματα, ὁπόσα ἐδυνήθη συναγαγεῖν, Ἀμύκλαν δὲ καὶ Κλεινίαν τοὺς Πυθαγορικοὺς κωλῦσαι αὐτόν, ὡς οὐδὲν ὄφελος1· παρὰ πολλοῖς γὰρ εἶναι ἤδη τὰ βιβλία. καὶ δῆλον δέ· πάντων γὰρ σχεδὸν τῶν ἀρχαίων μεμνημένος ὁ Πλάτων οὐδαμοῦ Δημοκρίτου διαμνημονεύει, ἀλλʼ οὐδʼ ἔνθʼ ἀντειπεῖν τι αὐτῷ δέοι, δῆλον 〈ὅτι〉 εἰδὼς ὡς πρὸς τὸν ἄριστον αὐτῷ τῶν φιλοσόφων 〈ὁ ἀγὼν〉 ἔσοιτο· ὅν γε καὶ Τίμων τοῦτον ἐπαινέσας τὸν τρόπον ἔχει· "οἷον Δημόκριτόν τε περίφρονα, ποιμένα μύθων, ἀμφίνοον λεσχῆνα μετὰ πρώτοισιν ἀνέγνων."

​However, Demetrius says that it was his relatives who read aloud the Great World-System, which alone was rewarded with a hundred talents. Hippobotus also states the same. Aristoxenus in his Historical Notes says that Plato wished to burn all the writings of Democritus that he was able to collect, but that Amyclas and Cleinias, the Pythagoreans, prevented him, on the ground that it would be of no avail, since the books were already in the hands of many people. And this is evident; for Plato, though mentioning almost all the ancient philosophers, nowhere mentions Democritus, not even where he ought to have contradicted him on some point, evidently knowing that his contest would be against the best of the philosophers. Timon also has praised him in this manner: “Such a Democritus, exceedingly wise, shepherd of tales, a deep-minded converser, did I read among the foremost.”

Γέγονε δὲ τοῖς χρόνοις, ὡς αὐτός φησιν ἐν τῷ Μικρῷ διακόσμῳ, νέος κατὰ πρεσβύτην Ἀναξαγόραν, ἔτεσιν αὐτοῦ νεώτερος τετταράκοντα. συντετάχθαι δέ φησι τὸν Μικρὸν διάκοσμον ἔτεσιν ὕστερον τῆς Ἰλίου ἁλώσεως τριάκοντα καὶ ἑπτακοσίοις. γεγόνοι δʼ ἄν, ὡς μὲν Ἀπολλόδωρος ἐν Χρονικοῖς, κατὰ τὴν ὀγδοηκοστὴν Ὀλυμπιάδα· ὡς δὲ Θρασύλος ἐν τῷ ἐπιγραφομένῳ Τὰ πρὸ τῆς ἀναγνώσεως τῶν Δημοκρίτου βιβλίων, κατὰ τὸ τρίτον ἔτος τῆς ἑβδόμης καὶ ἑβδομηκοστῆς Ὀλυμπιάδος, ἐνιαυτῷ, φησί, πρεσβύτερος ὢν Σωκράτους. εἴη ἂν οὖν κατʼ Ἀρχέλαον τὸν Ἀναξαγόρου μαθητὴν καὶ τοὺς περὶ Οἰνοπίδην· καὶ γὰρ τούτου μέμνηται.

​In chronological terms, as he himself says in the Small World-System, he was a young man when Anaxagoras was old, being forty years younger than him. He also states that the Small World-System was composed seven hundred and thirty years after the capture of Troy. He would thus have been born, according to Apollodorus in his Chronology, in the eightieth Olympiad; but according to Thrasylus in his work entitled Preliminary Readings to the Books of Democritus, in the third year of the seventy-seventh Olympiad, being, as he says, one year older than Socrates. He would therefore have been a contemporary of Archelaus, the pupil of Anaxagoras, and of the circle of Oenopides; for he actually mentions the latter.

μέμνηται δὲ καὶ τῆς περὶ τοῦ ἑνὸς δόξης τῶν περὶ Παρμενίδην καὶ Ζήνωνα, ὡς κατʼ αὐτὸν μάλιστα διαβεβοημένων, καὶ Πρωταγόρου τοῦ Ἀβδηρίτου, ὃς ὁμολογεῖται κατὰ Σωκράτην γεγονέναι. Φησὶ δʼ Ἀθηνόδωρος ἐν ὀγδόῃ Περιπάτων, ἐλθόντος Ἱπποκράτους πρὸς αὐτόν, κελεῦσαι κομισθῆναι γάλα· καὶ θεασάμενον τὸ γάλα εἰπεῖν εἶναι αἰγὸς πρωτοτόκου καὶ μελαίνης· ὅθεν τὴν ἀκρίβειαν αὐτοῦ θαυμάσαι τὸν Ἱπποκράτην. ἀλλὰ καὶ κόρης ἀκολουθούσης τῷ Ἱπποκράτει, τῇ μὲν πρώτῃ ἡμέρᾳ ἀσπάσασθαι οὕτω χαῖρε κόρη, τῇ δʼ ἐχομένῃ χαῖρε γύναι· καὶ ἦν ἡ κόρη τῆς νυκτὸς διεφθαρμένη.

​He also mentions the doctrine of the One held by Parmenides and Zeno, as being particularly celebrated in his day, and Protagoras of Abdera, who is agreed to have been a contemporary of Socrates. Athenodorus in the eighth book of his Walks says that when Hippocrates came to him, Democritus ordered milk to be brought; and having inspected the milk, he said it was from a first-born, black goat; whereupon Hippocrates marveled at his precision. Moreover, when a girl was accompanying Hippocrates, on the first day Democritus greeted her thus: “Greetings, maiden!” and on the next day: “Greetings, woman!” And the girl had indeed been deflowered during the night.

Τελευτῆσαι δὲ τὸν Δημόκριτόν φησιν Ἕρμιππος τοῦτον τὸν τρόπον. ἤδη ὑπέργηρων ὄντα πρὸς τῷ καταστρέφειν εἶναι. τὴν οὖν ἀδελφὴν λυπεῖσθαι ὅτι ἐν τῇ τῶν θεσμοφόρων ἑορτῇ μέλλοι τεθνήξεσθαι καὶ τῇ θεῷ τὸ καθῆκον αὐτὴ οὐ ποιήσειν2 τὸν δὲ θαρρεῖν εἰπεῖν καὶ κελεῦσαι αὑτῷ προσφέρειν ἄρτους θερμοὺς ὁσημέραι. τούτους δὴ ταῖς ῥισὶ προσφέρων διεκράτησεν αὑτὸν τὴν ἑορτήν· ἐπειδὴ δὲ παρῆλθον αἱ ἡμέραι, τρεῖς δʼ ἦσαν, ἀλυπότατα τὸν βίον προήκατο, ὥς φησιν ὁ Ἵππαρχος, ἐννέα πρὸς τοῖς ἑκατὸν ἔτη βιούς. Ἡμεῖς τʼ εἰς αὐτὸν ἐν τῇ Παμμέτρῳ τοῦτον ἐποιήσαμεν τὸν τρόπον· "καὶ τίς ἔφυ σοφὸς ὧδε, τίς ἔργον ἔρεξε τοσοῦτον ὅσσον ὁ παντοδαὴς ἤνυσε Δημόκριτος; ὃς Θάνατον παρεόντα τρίʼ ἤματα δώμασιν ἔσχεν καὶ θερμοῖς ἄρτων ἄσθμασιν ἐξένισεν." τοιοῦτος μὲν ὁ βίος τἀνδρός.

​Hermippus says that Democritus died in the following manner. Being already extremely aged, he was near his end. His sister was therefore grieving that he was likely to die during the festival of the Thesmophoria and that she would not be able to perform her duty to the goddess; but he told her to be of good cheer and ordered warm loaves of bread to be brought to him every day. By applying these to his nostrils, he sustained himself through the festival; and when the days—which were three—had passed, he gave up his life with the least possible pain, as Hipparchus says, having lived a hundred and nine years. We too composed verses on him in our Pammetros in this manner: “And who was born so wise, who accomplished so great a deed as Democritus, all-knowing, achieved? Who held Death, though present, within his house for three days, and entertained him with the warm vapors of loaves.” Such was the life of the man.

Δοκεῖ δʼ αὐτῷ τάδε· ἀρχὰς εἶναι τῶν ὅλων ἀτόμους καὶ κενόν, τὰ δʼ ἄλλα πάντα νενομίσθαι3· ἀπείρους τε εἶναι κόσμους καὶ γενητοὺς καὶ φθαρτούς. μηδέν τε ἐκ τοῦ μὴ ὄντος γίνεσθαι μηδὲ εἰς τὸ μὴ ὂν φθείρεσθαι. καὶ τὰς ἀτόμους δὲ ἀπείρους εἶναι κατὰ μέγεθος καὶ πλῆθος, φέρεσθαι δʼ ἐν τῷ ὅλῳ δινουμένας, καὶ οὕτω πάντα τὰ συγκρίματα γεννᾶν, πῦρ, ὕδωρ, ἀέρα, γῆν· εἶναι γὰρ καὶ ταῦτα ἐξ ἀτόμων τινῶν συστήματα· ἅπερ εἶναι ἀπαθῆ καὶ ἀναλλοίωτα διὰ τὴν στερρότητα. τόν τε ἥλιον καὶ τὴν σελήνην ἐκ τοιούτων λείων καὶ περιφερῶν ὄγκων συγκεκρίσθαι, καὶ τὴν ψυχὴν ὁμοίως· ἣν καὶ νοῦν ταὐτὸν εἶναι. ὁρᾶν δʼ ἡμᾶς κατʼ εἰδώλων ἐμπτώσεις.

​His doctrines are as follows: the first principles of the universe are atoms and void, while all other things are regarded as conventional; the worlds are infinite, generated, and perishable. Nothing comes into being from what is not, nor does it perish into what is not. The atoms are infinite in magnitude and in number, and they are carried along whirling in the universe, and thus generate all composite bodies: fire, water, air, earth; for even these are aggregates of certain atoms, which are impassive and unalterable on account of their solidity. The sun and the moon are composed of such smooth and spherical masses, and the soul likewise; and soul and mind are the same thing. We see by virtue of the impingement of images.

Syntax notes3 items
  1. 9.7.40ὡς οὐδὲν ὄφελος

    The conjunction ὡς followed by the nominal phrase οὐδὲν ὄφελος functions as an accusative absolute or an elliptical clause with the copula omitted (equivalent to ὡς οὐδὲν ὄφελός ἐστι), expressing the ground or pretext for their prevention ('on the ground that it was of no use').

  2. 9.7.43καὶ τῇ θεῷ τὸ καθῆκον αὐτὴ οὐ ποιήσειν

    Within the reported clause introduced by ὅτι, the future infinitive ποιήσειν is coordinated by καί with the optative μέλλοι. Its subject is expressed by the nominative pronoun αὐτή rather than an accusative, emphasizing the sister herself in contrast.

  3. 9.7.44τὰ δʼ ἄλλα πάντα νενομίσθαι

    The perfect passive infinitive νενομίσθαι (from νομίζω) stands in contrast to the real and objective first principles (ἀρχάς, i.e., atoms and void), reflecting Democritus' characteristic distinction between nature and convention (φύσις vs. νόμος): 'all other things exist merely by convention/custom.'

Model: gemini-3.8-flashurn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:9.7.40-9.7.44