- Source
- Diogenes Laertius. Hicks, R. D., editor. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann Ltd., 1925.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.8-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:9.7.34-9.7.39
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-09-30
The passage recounts Democritus' parentage, background, teachers (Persian Magi, Leucippus, and rivalry with Anaxagoras), extensive travels, studious habits, possible visit to Athens, philosophical breadth as a "pentathlete," and public honors received for the Great World-System.
Δημόκριτος Ἡγησιστράτου, οἱ δὲ Ἀθηνοκρίτου, τινὲς Δαμασίππου Ἀβδηρίτης ἤ, ὡς ἔνιοι, Μιλήσιος. οὗτος μάγων τινῶν διήκουσε καὶ Χαλδαίων, Ξέρξου τοῦ βασιλέως τῷ πατρὶ αὐτοῦ ἐπιστάτας καταλιπόντος, ἡνίκα ἐξενίσθη παρʼ αὐτῷ, καθά φησι καὶ Ἡρόδοτος· παρʼ ὧν τά τε περὶ θεολογίας καὶ ἀστρολογίας ἔμαθεν ἔτι παῖς ὤν. ὕστερον δὲ Λευκίππῳ παρέβαλε καὶ Ἀναξαγόρᾳ κατά τινας, ἔτεσιν ὢν αὐτοῦ νεώτερος τετταράκοντα. Φαβωρῖνος δέ φησιν ἐν Παντοδαπῇ ἱστορίᾳ λέγειν Δημόκριτον περὶ Ἀναξαγόρου ὡς οὐκ εἴησαν αὐτοῦ αἱ δόξαι αἵ τε περὶ ἡλίου καὶ σελήνης, ἀλλὰ ἀρχαῖαι, τὸν δʼ ὑφῃρῆσθαι.
Democritus was the son of Hegesistratus, or according to some, of Athenocritus, and according to others, of Damasippus; he was a native of Abdera, or as some say, of Miletus. He was a pupil of certain Magi and Chaldaeans, King Xerxes having left them behind as overseers with his father when he was entertained by him, just as Herodotus also relates; from these, while still a boy, he learned theology and astronomy. Later he associated with Leucippus, and, according to some, with Anaxagoras, being forty years younger than the latter. But Favorinus in his Universal History states that Democritus said concerning Anaxagoras that the doctrines regarding the sun and the moon were not his own, but ancient, and that he had plagiarized them.
διασύρειν τε αὐτοῦ τὰ περὶ τῆς διακοσμήσεως καὶ τοῦ νοῦ, ἐχθρῶς ἔχοντα πρὸς αὐτὸν ὅτι δὴ μὴ προσήκατο αὐτόν. πῶς οὖν κατά τινας ἀκήκοεν αὐτοῦ; Φησὶ δὲ Δημήτριος ἐν Ὁμωνύμοις καὶ Ἀντισθένης ἐν Διαδοχαῖς ἀποδημῆσαι αὐτὸν καὶ εἰς Αἴγυπτον πρὸς τοὺς ἱερέας γεωμετρίαν μαθησόμενον καὶ πρὸς Χαλδαίους εἰς τὴν Περσίδα καὶ εἰς τὴν Ἐρυθρὰν θάλασσαν γενέσθαι. τοῖς τε Γυμνοσοφισταῖς φασί τινες συμμῖξαι αὐτὸν ἐν Ἰνδίᾳ καὶ εἰς Αἰθιοπίαν ἐλθεῖν. τρίτον τε ὄντα ἀδελφὸν νείμασθαι τὴν οὐσίαν· καὶ οἱ μὲν πλείους φασὶ τὴν ἐλάττω μοῖραν ἑλέσθαι τὴν ἐν ἀργυρίῳ, χρείαν ἔχοντα 〈διὰ τὸ〉 ἀποδημῆσαι τούτου κἀκείνων δολίως ὑποπτευσάντων1.
He also states that Democritus disparaged Anaxagoras' doctrines on the cosmos and on mind, being hostile toward him because Anaxagoras had not received him into his company. How then could he, according to some, have been his pupil? Demetrius in his Men of the Same Name and Antisthenes in his Successions say that he traveled even to Egypt to the priests to learn geometry, and to the Chaldaeans in Persia, and went as far as the Red Sea. Some also say that he associated with the Gymnosophists in India and visited Ethiopia. Moreover, being the third brother, he divided the property; and most authorities say that he chose the smaller share in silver money, because he needed it for traveling, while his brothers craftily suspected his intentions.
ὁ δὲ Δημήτριος ὑπὲρ ἑκατὸν τάλαντά φησιν εἶναι αὐτῷ τὸ μέρος, ἃ πάντα καταναλῶσαι. λέγει δʼ ὅτι τοσοῦτον ἦν φιλόπονος ὥστε τοῦ περικήπου δωμάτιόν τι ἀποτεμόμενος κατάκλειστος ἦν· καί ποτε τοῦ πατρὸς αὐτοῦ πρὸς θυσίαν βοῦν ἀγαγόντος καὶ αὐτόθι προσδήσαντος, ἱκανὸν χρόνον μὴ γνῶναι, ἕως αὐτὸν ἐκεῖνος διαναστήσας προφάσει τῆς θυσίας καὶ τὰ περὶ τὸν βοῦν διηγήσατο. δοκεῖ δέ, φησί, καὶ Ἀθήναζε ἐλθεῖν καὶ μὴ σπουδάσαι γνωσθῆναι, δόξης καταφρονῶν. καὶ εἰδέναι μὲν Σωκράτη, ἀγνοεῖσθαι δὲ ὑπʼ αὐτοῦ· ἦλθον γάρ, φησίν, εἰς Ἀθήνας καὶ οὔτις με ἔγνωκεν.
However, Demetrius says that his portion amounted to over a hundred talents, all of which he expended. He also relates that he was so industrious that he cut off a small room in the surrounding garden and shut himself up there; and once, when his father brought an ox for sacrifice and tied it up right there, Democritus did not notice it for a considerable time, until his father, having roused him on the pretext of the sacrifice, explained to him the matter of the ox. It seems also, he says, that he went to Athens and took no pains to become known, looking down upon fame. And while he knew Socrates, he was not known by him; “for,” he says, “I came to Athens and no one knew me.”
Εἴπερ οἱ Ἀντερασταὶ Πλάτωνός εἰσι, φησὶ Θρασύλος, οὗτος ἂν εἴη ὁ παραγενόμενος ἀνώνυμος, τῶν περὶ Οἰνοπίδην καὶ Ἀναξαγόραν ἕτερος, ἐν τῇ πρὸς Σωκράτην ὁμιλίᾳ διαλεγόμενος περὶ φιλοσοφίας, ᾧ, φησίν, ὡς πεντάθλῳ ἔοικεν ὁ φιλόσοφος2, καὶ ἦν ὡς ἀληθῶς ἐν φιλοσοφίᾳ πένταθλος· τὰ γὰρ φυσικὰ καὶ τὰ ἠθικὰ 〈ἤσκητο〉, ἀλλὰ καὶ τὰ μαθηματικὰ καὶ τοὺς ἐγκυκλίους λόγους καὶ περὶ τεχνῶν πᾶσαν εἶχεν ἐμπειρίαν. τούτου ἐστὶ καὶ τὸ λόγος ἔργου σκιή. Δημήτριος δὲ ὁ Φαληρεὺς ἐν τῇ Σωκράτους ἀπολογίᾳ μηδὲ ἐλθεῖν φησιν αὐτὸν εἰς Ἀθήνας. τοῦτο δὲ καὶ μεῖζον, εἴγε τοσαύτης πόλεως ὑπερεφρόνησεν, οὐκ ἐκ τόπου δόξαν λαβεῖν βουλόμενος, ἀλλὰ τόπῳ δόξαν περιθεῖναι προελόμενος.
“If the Rivals is by Plato,” says Thrasylus, “this must be that anonymous person who arrived, distinct from the followers of Oenopides and Anaxagoras, conversing with Socrates about philosophy, according to whom, as he says, the philosopher resembles a pentathlete; and he was indeed truly a pentathlete in philosophy. For he had trained in physics and ethics, but also in mathematics and the liberal arts, and possessed all-around expertise in the arts.” To him also belongs the saying: “Speech is the shadow of action.” Demetrius of Phalerum, however, in his Apology of Socrates, says that he did not even go to Athens. And this is an even greater thing, if indeed he looked down upon so great a city, wishing not to receive fame from a place, but having chosen rather to confer fame upon a place.
Δῆλον δὲ κἀκ τῶν συγγραμμάτων οἷος ἦν. δοκεῖ δέ, φησὶν ὁ Θρασύλος, ζηλωτὴς γεγονέναι τῶν Πυθαγορικῶν· ἀλλὰ καὶ αὐτοῦ Πυθαγόρου μέμνηται, θαυμάζων αὐτὸν ἐν τῷ ὁμωνύμῳ συγγράμματι. πάντα δὲ δοκεῖν παρὰ τούτου λαβεῖν καὶ αὐτοῦ δʼ ἂν ἀκηκοέναι, εἰ μὴ τὰ τῶν χρόνων ἐμάχετο. πάντως μέντοι τῶν Πυθαγορικῶν τινος ἀκοῦσαί φησιν αὐτὸν Γλαῦκος ὁ Ῥηγῖνος, κατὰ τοὺς αὐτοὺς χρόνους αὐτῷ γεγονώς. φησὶ δὲ καὶ Ἀπολλόδωρος ὁ Κυζικηνὸς Φιλολάῳ αὐτὸν συγγεγονέναι. Ἤσκει δέ, φησὶν ὁ Ἀντισθένης, καὶ ποικίλως δοκιμάζειν τὰς φαντασίας, ἐρημάζων ἐνίοτε καὶ τοῖς τάφοις ἐνδιατρίβων.
It is clear also from his writings what sort of man he was. It seems, says Thrasylus, that he became an emulator of the Pythagoreans; moreover, he mentions Pythagoras himself, expressing admiration for him in the treatise named after him. He appears to have derived everything from him, and would have been his pupil had chronology not stood in the way. At all events, Glaucus of Rhegium, who was his contemporary, says that he heard one of the Pythagoreans; and Apollodorus of Cyzicus also says that he associated with Philolaus. He also used to train himself, says Antisthenes, to test his impressions in various ways, sometimes living in solitude and lingering among tombs.
ἐλθόντα δή φησιν αὐτὸν ἐκ τῆς ἀποδημίας ταπεινότατα διάγειν, ἅτε πᾶσαν τὴν οὐσίαν καταναλωκότα· τρέφεσθαί τε διὰ τὴν ἀπορίαν ἀπὸ τἀδελφοῦ Δαμάσου. ὡς δὲ προειπών τινα τῶν μελλόντων εὐδοκίμησε, λοιπὸν ἐνθέου δόξης παρὰ τοῖς πλείστοις ἠξιώθη. νόμου δʼ ὄντος τὸν ἀναλώσαντα τὴν πατρῴαν οὐσίαν μὴ ἀξιοῦσθαι ταφῆς ἐν τῇ πατρίδι, φησὶν ὁ Ἀντισθένης συνέντα, μὴ ὑπεύθυνος γενηθείη πρός τινων φθονούντων καὶ συκοφαντούντων, ἀναγνῶναι αὐτοῖς τὸν Μέγαν διάκοσμον3, ὃς ἁπάντων αὐτοῦ τῶν συγγραμμάτων προέχει· καὶ πεντακοσίοις ταλάντοις τιμηθῆναι· μὴ μόνον δέ, ἀλλὰ καὶ χαλκαῖς εἰκόσι· καὶ τελευτήσαντʼ αὐτὸν δημοσίᾳ ταφῆναι, βιώσαντα ὑπὲρ τὰ ἑκατὸν ἔτη.
He says that upon returning from his travels Democritus lived in the humblest manner, since he had consumed all his property; and on account of his poverty he was supported by his brother Damasus. But when he gained renown by foretelling some future events, he was thenceforth deemed worthy of divine reputation among most people. There being a law that one who had squandered his paternal estate should not be deemed worthy of burial in his native land, Antisthenes says that Democritus, perceiving this, lest he should become liable to prosecution by certain envious persons and slanderers, read aloud to them the Great World-System, which surpasses all his writings; and he was rewarded with five hundred talents, and not only that, but also with bronze statues; and when he died, having lived for over a hundred years, he was buried at public expense.
- 9.7.35χρείαν ἔχοντα 〈διὰ τὸ〉 ἀποδημῆσαι τούτου κἀκείνων δολίως ὑποπτευσάντων
The genitive τούτου depends on the verbal phrase χρείαν ἔχοντα ("needing this"), referring back to ἀργυρίῳ (cash/silver money). The subsequent clause κἀκείνων δολίως ὑποπτευσάντων is a genitive absolute describing the brothers' malicious suspicion of his motives.
- 9.7.37ᾧ, φησίν, ὡς πεντάθλῳ ἔοικεν ὁ φιλόσοφος
The relative pronoun ᾧ refers to the anonymous visitor (ὁ παραγενόμενος ἀνώνυμος). Here the dative functions as a dative of reference or opinion ("in whose view / according to whom"), rather than the direct complement of ἔοικεν, reflecting the passage in Plato's Erastae (135e) where the unnamed youth claims that the philosopher resembles a pentathlete.
- 9.7.39συνέντα, μὴ ὑπεύθυνος γενηθείη πρός τινων φθονούντων καὶ συκοφαντούντων, ἀναγνῶναι αὐτοῖς τὸν Μέγαν διάκοσμον
The accusative participle συνέντα acts as the subject of the infinitive ἀναγνῶναι in indirect speech, referring to Democritus. The inserted clause μὴ ὑπεύθυνος γενηθείη is a clause of apprehension/precaution ("lest he become liable to charge"), employing the optative mood γενηθείη in secondary sequence.
