- Source
- Diogenes Laertius. Hicks, R. D., editor. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann Ltd., 1925.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.8-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:9.12.113-9.12.116
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-09-30
Anecdotes of Timon's sharp wit, careless handling of manuscripts, and bantering exchanges with Arcesilaus and others are recounted, followed by the Skeptical lineage running from Timon down to Sextus Empiricus.
Ἦν δὲ καὶ ὀξὺς νοῆσαι καὶ διαμυκτηρίσαι· φιλογράμματός τε καὶ τοῖς ποιηταῖς μύθους γράψαι ἱκανὸς καὶ δράματα συνδιατιθέναι. μετεδίδου δὲ τῶν τραγῳδιῶν Ἀλεξάνδρῳ καὶ Ὁμήρῳ. θορυβούμενός θʼ ὑπὸ τῶν θεραπαινῶν καὶ κυνῶν ἐποίει μηδέν, σπουδάζων περὶ τὸ ἠρεμάζειν. φασὶ δὲ καὶ Ἄρατον πυθέσθαι αὐτοῦ πῶς τὴν Ὁμήρου ποίησιν ἀσφαλῆ κτήσαιτο, τὸν δὲ εἰπεῖν, εἰ τοῖς ἀρχαίοις ἀντιγράφοις ἐντυγχάνοι καὶ μὴ τοῖς ἤδη διωρθωμένοις1. εἰκῆ τε αὐτῷ ἔκειτο τὰ ποιήματα, ἐνίοτε ἡμίβρωτα·
He was also sharp in understanding and quick to jeer; he was a lover of letters and capable of writing plots for the poets and collaborating in the composition of dramas. He shared his tragedies with Alexander and Homerus. When disturbed by the maidservants and dogs, he would do nothing, being eager to keep quiet. They say that Aratus also inquired of him how he might procure a sound text of Homer's poetry, and that he replied: "If you consult the ancient manuscripts, and not those that have already been emended." His poems lay about at random for him, sometimes half-eaten;
ὥστε καὶ Ζωπύρῳ τῷ ῥήτορι ἀναγινώσκοντά τι ἐπιτυλίττειν καὶ κατὰ τὸ ἐπελθὸν διεξιέναι· ἐλθόντα τʼ ἐφʼ ἡμισείας, οὕτως εὑρεῖν τὸ ἀπόσπασμα τέως ἀγνοοῦντα2. τοσοῦτον ἦν ἀδιάφορος. ἀλλὰ καὶ εὔρους· ὡς μηδʼ ἀριστᾶν συγχωρεῖν. φασὶ δʼ αὐτὸν Ἀρκεσίλαον θεασάμενον διὰ τῶν Κερκώπων ἰόντα, εἰπεῖν, τί σὺ δεῦρο, ἔνθαπερ ἡμεῖς οἱ ἐλεύθεροι; συνεχές τε ἐπιλέγειν εἰώθει πρὸς τοὺς τὰς αἰσθήσεις μετʼ ἐπιμαρτυροῦντος τοῦ νοῦ ἐγκρίνοντας, "συνῆλθεν Ἀτταγᾶς τε καὶ Νουμήνιος." εἰώθει δὲ καὶ παίζειν τοιαῦτα. πρὸς οὖν τὸν θαυμάζοντα πάντα ἔφη, τί δʼ οὐ θαυμάζεις ὅτι τρεῖς ὄντες τέτταρας ἔχομεν ὀφθαλμούς; ἦν δʼ αὐτός τε ἑτερόφθαλμος καὶ ὁ Διοσκουρίδης μαθητὴς αὐτοῦ, καὶ ὁ πρὸς ὃν ἔλεγεν ὑγιής.
so that when reading something to Zopyrus the rhetorician, he rolled up the scroll and went through whatever came into his head; and when he had gone halfway, only then did he find the passage, having been unaware of it till then. So indifferent was he. Yet he was also fluent in speech, so as not even to allow time for breakfast. They say that when he saw Arcesilaus passing through the Cercopes, he said: "Why are you coming here, where we freemen are?" And he was accustomed constantly to quote against those who approve sensory impressions when verified by the intellect: "Attagas and Noumenios have met together." He was also in the habit of making jokes like this. To someone who marveled at everything, he said: "Why don't you marvel that though we are three, we have four eyes?" For both he himself and his pupil Dioscurides were one-eyed, while the man to whom he spoke had his sight sound.
ἐρωτηθεὶς δέ ποθʼ ὑπὸ τοῦ Ἀρκεσιλάου διὰ τί παρείη ἐκ Θηβῶν, ἔφη, ἵνʼ ὑμᾶς ἀναπεπταμένους ὁρῶν γελῶ3. ὅμως δὲ καθαπτόμενος Ἀρκεσιλάου ἐν τοῖς σίλλοις ἐπῄνεκεν αὐτὸν ἐν τῷ ἐπιγραφομένῳ Ἀρκεσιλάου περιδείπνῳ. Τούτου διάδοχος, ὡς μὲν Μηνόδοτός φησι, γέγονεν οὐδείς, ἀλλὰ διέλιπεν ἡ ἀγωγὴ ἕως αὐτὴν Πτολεμαῖος ὁ Κυρηναῖος ἀνεκτήσατο. ὡς δʼ Ἱππόβοτός φησι καὶ Σωτίων, διήκουσαν αὐτοῦ Διοσκουρίδης Κύπριος καὶ Νικόλοχος Ῥόδιος καὶ Εὐφράνωρ Σελευκεὺς Πραΰλους τʼ ἀπὸ Τρωάδος, ὃς οὕτω καρτερικὸς ἐγένετο, καθά φησι Φύλαρχος ἱστορῶν, ὥστʼ ἀδίκως ὑπομεῖναι ὡς ἐπὶ προδοσίᾳ κολασθῆναι, μηδὲ λόγου τοὺς πολίτας καταξιώσας.
When asked once by Arcesilaus why he was present from Thebes, he said: "So that I may laugh at seeing you all stretched out at ease." Yet, although he attacked Arcesilaus in his *Silli*, he praised him in the work entitled *Arcesilaus' Funeral Banquet*. No successor to him arose, as Menodotus says; rather, the school lapsed until Ptolemy of Cyrene revived it. But as Hippobotus and Sotion say, Dioscurides of Cyprus, Nicolochus of Rhodes, Euphranor of Seleucia, and Praÿlus from the Troad were his pupils; and Praÿlus became so steadfast, as Phylarchus records in his history, that he unjustly endured being punished on a charge of treason, not having deemed the citizens worthy of even a word of defense.
Εὐφράνορος δὲ διήκουσεν Εὔβουλος Ἀλεξανδρεύς, οὗ Πτολεμαῖος, οὗ Σαρπηδὼν καὶ Ἡρακλείδης, Ἡρακλείδου δʼ Αἰνεσίδημος Κνώσιος, ὃς καὶ Πυρρωνείων λόγων ὀκτὼ συνέγραψε βιβλία· οὗ Ζεύξιππος ὁ πολίτης, οὗ Ζεῦξις ὁ Γωνιόπους, οὗ Ἀντίοχος Λαοδικεὺς ἀπὸ Λύκου· τούτου δὲ Μηνόδοτος ὁ Νικομηδεύς, ἰατρὸς ἐμπειρικός, καὶ Θειωδᾶς Λαοδικεύς· Μηνοδότου δὲ Ἡρόδοτος Ἀριέως Ταρσεύς· Ἡροδότου δὲ διήκουσε Σέξτος ὁ ἐμπειρικός, οὗ καὶ τὰ δέκα τῶν Σκεπτικῶν καὶ ἄλλα κάλλιστα· Σέξτου δὲ διήκουσε Σατορνῖνος ὁ Κυθηνᾶς, ἐμπειρικὸς καὶ αὐτός.
Euphranor's pupil was Eubulus of Alexandria; his was Ptolemy; his were Sarpedon and Heraclides; and Heraclides' was Aenesidemus of Cnossus, who also wrote eight books of *Pyrrhonean Discourses*; his pupil was his fellow-citizen Zeuxippus; his was Zeuxis Goniopus; his was Antiochus of Laodicea on the Lycus; and his were Menodotus of Nicomedia, an empirical physician, and Theiodas of Laodicea; Menodotus' pupil was Herodotus of Tarsus, son of Arieus; Herodotus' was Sextus the Empiric, whose works include the ten books of the *Skeptica* and other very fine treatises; and Sextus' pupil was Saturninus of Cythenas, who was also himself an empiric.
- 9.12.113εἰ τοῖς ἀρχαίοις ἀντιγράφοις ἐντυγχάνοι καὶ μὴ τοῖς ἤδη διωρθωμένοις
A conditional clause in indirect discourse using the optative without an explicit apodosis. Responding to Aratus's question "πῶς ... κτήσαιτο" ('how he might procure...'), the apodosis ('he would procure it') is omitted as understood from context. The optative represents an oblique optative standing for a direct condition (either potential optative or future more/less vivid).
- 9.12.114ὥστε καὶ Ζωπύρῳ τῷ ῥήτορι ἀναγινώσκοντά τι ἐπιτυλίττειν καὶ κατὰ τὸ ἐπελθὸν διεξιέναι· ἐλθόντα τʼ ἐφʼ ἡμισείας, οὕτως εὑρεῖν τὸ ἀπόσπασμα τέως ἀγνοοῦντα
In the result clause introduced by ὥστε, the infinitives (ἐπιτυλίττειν, διεξιέναι, εὑρεῖν) have their subject (Timon) expressed in the accusative along with the modifying participles (ἀναγινώσκοντα, ἐλθόντα, ἀγνοοῦντα). The dative Ζωπύρῳ τῷ ῥήτορι depends on ἀναγινώσκοντα ('reading to Zopyrus the rhetorician'). The adverb τέως ('all that while / up to that point') modifies the participle ἀγνοοῦντα.
- 9.12.115ἵνʼ ὑμᾶς ἀναπεπταμένους ὁρῶν γελῶ
Purpose clause with ἵνα and the subjunctive γελῶ. The perfect passive participle ἀναπεπταμένους (from ἀναπετάννυμι, 'to spread out wide, unfold') is used metaphorically, referring to living openly/at ease, stretched out, or puffed up. In context, it conveys laughing at Arcesilaus and his circle lounging expansively or conducting their philosophical displays.
