- Source
- Diogenes Laertius. Hicks, R. D., editor. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann Ltd., 1925.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.8-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:7.7.179-7.7.183
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-09-28
The life of the Stoic philosopher Chrysippus is recounted, including his relations with Zeno and Cleanthes, his prolific writings and fame in dialectic, as well as anecdotes reflecting his stature and pride.
Χρύσιππος Ἀπολλωνίου Σολεὺς ἢ Ταρσεύς, ὡς Ἀλέξανδρος ἐν Διαδοχαῖς, μαθητὴς Κλεάνθους. οὗτος πρότερον μὲν δόλιχον ἤσκει, ἔπειτʼ ἀκούσας Ζήνωνος ἢ Κλεάνθους, ὡς Διοκλῆς καὶ οἱ πλείους, ἔτι τε ζῶντος ἀπέστη αὐτοῦ καὶ οὐχ ὁ τυχὼν ἐγένετο κατὰ φιλοσοφίαν· ἀνὴρ εὐφυὴς καὶ ὀξύτατος ἐν παντὶ μέρει οὕτως ὥστε καὶ ἐν τοῖς πλείστοις διηνέχθη πρὸς Ζήνωνα, ἀλλὰ καὶ πρὸς Κλεάνθην, ᾧ καὶ πολλάκις ἔλεγε μόνης τῆς τῶν δογμάτων διδασκαλίας χρῄζειν1, τὰς δὲ ἀποδείξεις αὐτὸς εὑρήσειν. μετενόει μέντοι ὁπότε πρὸς αὐτὸν ἀποτείνοιτο, ὥστε συνεχὲς προφέρεσθαι ταῦτα· "ἐγὼ δὲ τἄλλα μακάριος πέφυκʼ ἀνὴρ πλὴν εἰς Κλεάνθην· τοῦτο δʼ οὐκ εὐδαιμονῶ."
Chrysippus, son of Apollonius, from Soli or from Tarsus—as Alexander says in his Successions—was a pupil of Cleanthes. Formerly he used to train for the long-distance race; then, having attended the lectures of Zeno, or, as Diocles and the majority say, of Cleanthes, he broke away from him while he was still living, and became no ordinary figure in philosophy. He was a talented and exceptionally acute man in every department, so much so that he differed from Zeno in most matters, and indeed from Cleanthes as well, to whom he used often to say that he needed only to be taught the doctrines, and that he would find the demonstrations for himself. Yet he used to feel remorse whenever he spoke sharply against him, so that he continually repeated these verses: "In all else I am born a fortunate man, except toward Cleanthes; in this I am not blessed."
Οὕτω δʼ ἐπίδοξος ἐν τοῖς διαλεκτικοῖς ἐγένετο, ὥστε δοκεῖν τοὺς πλείους ὅτι εἰ παρὰ θεοῖς ἦν [ἡ] διαλεκτική, οὐκ ἂν ἄλλη ἦν ἢ ἡ Χρυσίππειος2. πλεονάσας δὲ τοῖς πράγμασι τὴν λέξιν οὐ κατώρθωσε. πονικώτατός τε παρʼ ὁντινοῦν γέγονεν, ὡς δῆλον ἐκ τῶν συγγραμμάτων αὐτοῦ· τὸν ἀριθμὸν γὰρ ὑπὲρ πέντε καὶ ἑπτακόσιά ἐστιν. ἐπλήθυνε δʼ αὐτὰ πολλάκις ὑπὲρ τοῦ αὐτοῦ δόγματος ἐπιχειρῶν καὶ πᾶν τὸ ὑποπεσὸν γράφων καὶ διορθούμενος πλεονάκις πλείστῃ τε τῶν μαρτυριῶν παραθέσει χρώμενος· ὥστε καὶ ἐπειδή ποτʼ ἔν τινι τῶν συγγραμμάτων παρʼ ὀλίγον τὴν Εὐριπίδου Μήδειαν ὅλην παρετίθετο καί τις μετὰ χεῖρας εἶχε τὸ βιβλίον, πρὸς τὸν πυθόμενον τί ἄρα ἔχοι, ἔφη, Χρυσίππου Μήδειαν.
He became so renowned in dialectic that most people thought that if dialectic existed among the gods, it would be none other than that of Chrysippus. But while he was exuberant in his subject matter, he did not achieve a polished style. He was also more industrious than anyone, as is clear from his writings; for their number exceeds seven hundred and five. He multiplied them by treating the same doctrine repeatedly, writing down everything that occurred to him, revising multiple times, and making excessive use of citations of testimonies. Consequently, when in one of his treatises he cited almost the entirety of Euripides' Medea, and someone was holding the book in his hands, to someone inquiring what he had, he replied: "Chrysippus' Medea."
Καὶ Ἀπολλόδωρος δʼ ὁ Ἀθηναῖος ἐν τῇ Συναγωγῇ τῶν δογμάτων, βουλόμενος παριστάνειν ὅτι τὰ Ἐπικούρου οἰκείᾳ δυνάμει γεγραμμένα καὶ ἀπαράθετα ὄντα μυρίῳ πλείω ἐστὶ τῶν Χρυσίππου βιβλίων, φησὶν οὕτως αὐτῇ τῇ λέξει· εἰ γάρ τις ἀφέλοι τῶν Χρυσίππου βιβλίων ὅσʼ ἀλλότρια παρατέθειται, κενὸς αὐτῷ ὁ χάρτης καταλελείψεται. καὶ ταῦτα μὲν Ἀπολλόδωρος. ἡ δὲ παρεδρεύουσα πρεσβῦτις αὐτῷ, ὥς φησι Διοκλῆς, ἔλεγεν ὡς πεντακοσίους γράφοι στίχους ἡμερησίους. Ἑκάτων δέ φησιν ἐλθεῖν αὐτὸν ἐπὶ φιλοσοφίαν, τῆς οὐσίας αὐτοῦ τῆς πατρῴας εἰς τὸ βασιλικὸν ἀναληφθείσης.
And Apollodorus of Athens, in his Collection of Doctrines, wishing to show that the works of Epicurus, written from his own resources and without citations, are far more numerous than the books of Chrysippus, says in these very words: "For if anyone should strip from the books of Chrysippus all the alien material cited in them, his papyrus roll will be left empty." Such is Apollodorus' remark. And the old woman who attended him, as Diocles says, used to say that he wrote five hundred lines a day. Hecaton says that he turned to philosophy when his ancestral property was confiscated to the royal treasury.
Ἦν δὲ καὶ τὸ σωμάτιον εὐτελής, ὡς δῆλον ἐκ τοῦ ἀνδριάντος τοῦ ἐν Κεραμεικῷ, ὃς σχεδόν τι ὑποκέκρυπται τῷ πλησίον ἱππεῖ· ὅθεν αὐτὸν ὁ Καρνεάδης Κρύψιππον ἔλεγεν3. οὗτος ὀνειδισθεὶς ὑπό τινος ὅτι οὐχὶ παρʼ Ἀρίστωνι μετὰ πολλῶν σχολάζοι, εἰ τοῖς πολλοῖς, εἶπε προσεῖχον, οὐκ ἂν ἐφιλοσόφησα. πρὸς δὲ τὸν κατεξανιστάμενον Κλεάνθους διαλεκτικὸν καὶ προτείνοντα αὐτῷ σοφίσματα, πέπαυσο, εἶπε, περιέλκων τὸν πρεσβύτην ἀπὸ τῶν πραγματικωτέρων, ἡμῖν δὲ τὰ τοιαῦτα πρότεινε τοῖς νέοις. πάλιν δʼ ἐπεί τις ζητῶν καταμόνας αὐτῷ διελέγετο εὐσταθῶς, ἔπειτα δὲ θεωρῶν προσιόντα ὄχλον ἤρχετο φιλονεικεῖν, ἔφη, "οἴμοι, κασίγνητʼ, ὄμμα σὸν ταράσσεται· ταχὺς δὲ μετέθου λύσσαν ἀρτίως φρονῶν."
He was also insignificant in bodily stature, as is clear from the statue of him in the Ceramicus, which is almost completely hidden by the equestrian statue nearby; whence Carneades used to call him Crypsippus. When he was reproached by someone for not studying with Aristo along with the multitude, he said: "If I paid heed to the multitude, I should not be studying philosophy." And to a dialectician who was attacking Cleanthes and proposing sophisms to him, he said: "Cease dragging the old man away from more substantial matters, and propose such things to us, the young." Again, when someone was discussing an inquiry with him calmly in private, but on seeing a crowd approach began to grow contentious, Chrysippus said: "Alas, my brother, your eye is troubled; swiftly have you turned to frenzy, though but now in your right mind."
Ἐν μέντοι ταῖς οἰνώσεσιν ἡσύχαζε παραφερόμενος τοῖς σκέλεσιν, ὥστʼ εἰπεῖν τὴν δούλην, Χρυσίππου μόνα τὰ σκέλη μεθύει. οὕτω δʼ ἦν φρονηματίας ὥστʼ ἐρομένου τινὸς τίνι συστήσω τὸν υἱόν; εἰπεῖν, ἐμοί· καὶ γὰρ εἰ ὑπελάμβανον εἶναί τινʼ ἐμοῦ βελτίονα, παρʼ αὐτῷ ἂν ἐγὼ ἐφιλοσόφουν. ὅθεν φασὶν ἐπʼ αὐτοῦ λεχθῆναι, "οἶος πέπνυται, τοὶ δὲ σκιαὶ ἀΐσσουσι·" καί, "εἰ μὴ γὰρ ἦν Χρύσιππος, οὐκ ἂν ἦν στοά." Τέλος δʼ Ἀρκεσιλάῳ καὶ Λακύδῃ, καθά φησι Σωτίων ἐν τῷ ὀγδόῳ, παραγενόμενος ἐν Ἀκαδημείᾳ συνεφιλοσόφησε·
Nevertheless, in drinking bouts he remained quiet while unsteady on his feet, so that his maidservant said: "Only the legs of Chrysippus are drunk." He was so proud that, when someone asked, "To whom shall I entrust my son?" he replied, "To me; for if I supposed that there were anyone better than myself, I should be studying philosophy under him." Hence, they say, it was said of him: "He alone is endowed with understanding, but the rest flit about like shadows;" and: "For if there had been no Chrysippus, there would have been no Stoa." Finally, as Sotion says in his eighth book, he attended the Academy and studied philosophy alongside Arcesilaus and Lacydes.
- 7.7.179μόνης τῆς τῶν δογμάτων διδασκαλίας χρῄζειν
The verb χρῄζω ('to lack', 'to need') governs the genitive of the thing needed (μόνης τῆς... διδασκαλίας). This is contrasted with τὰς δὲ ἀποδείξεις, reported in indirect discourse with the accusative and infinitive construction: Chrysippus claimed he needed only the transmission of doctrines from Cleanthes, finding the proofs entirely on his own.
- 7.7.180εἰ παρὰ θεοῖς ἦν [ἡ] διαλεκτική, οὐκ ἂν ἄλλη ἦν ἢ ἡ Χρυσίππειος
A present counterfactual conditional construction featuring the imperfect in the protasis (ἦν) and ἄν with the imperfect in the apodosis (οὐκ ἂν ἄλλη ἦν). It expresses a timeless or present hypothetical scenario contrary to fact: 'if dialectic were found among the gods, it would be none other than Chrysippus'.'
- 7.7.182ὃς σχεδόν τι ὑποκέκρυπται τῷ πλησίον ἱππεῖ· ὅθεν αὐτὸν ὁ Καρνεάδης Κρύψιππον ἔλεγεν
The dative τῷ πλησίον ἱππεῖ with the perfect passive verb ὑποκέκρυπται expresses the agent, cause, or instrument ('hidden by the nearby equestrian statue'). The subsequent nickname Κρύψιππος is a pun playing on the name Chrysippus (Χρύσιππος), formed from κρύπτω ('to hide') and ἵππος ('horse').
