← Diogenes Laertius

Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers

§7.1.98-7.1.103

The Noble as the Sole Good and Indifferent Things

The passage classifies goods of the soul and defines various predicates of the good, demonstrating that the noble alone is good, and establishes the threefold division into goods, evils, and indifferents, arguing that wealth, health, and pleasure are indifferents.

← PrevNext →

Ἔτι τῶν περὶ ψυχὴν ἀγαθῶν τὰ μέν εἰσιν ἕξεις, τὰ δὲ διαθέσεις, τὰ δʼ οὔθʼ ἕξεις οὔτε διαθέσεις. διαθέσεις μὲν αἱ ἀρεταί, ἕξεις δὲ τὰ ἐπιτηδεύματα, οὔτε δʼ ἕξεις οὔτε διαθέσεις αἱ ἐνέργειαι. κοινῶς δὲ τῶν ἀγαθῶν μικτὰ μέν ἐστιν εὐτεκνία καὶ εὐγηρία, ἁπλοῦν δʼ ἐστὶν ἀγαθὸν ἐπιστήμη. καὶ ἀεὶ μὲν παρόντα αἱ ἀρεταί, οὐκ ἀεὶ δέ, οἷον χαρά, περιπάτησις. Πᾶν δʼ ἀγαθὸν συμφέρον εἶναι καὶ δέον καὶ λυσιτελὲς καὶ χρήσιμον καὶ εὔχρηστον καὶ καλὸν καὶ ὠφέλιμον καὶ αἱρετὸν καὶ δίκαιον.

​Furthermore, of the goods pertaining to the soul, some are states, some are dispositions, and some are neither states nor dispositions. The virtues are dispositions, occupations are states, and activities are neither states nor dispositions. And generally among goods, having good children and a good old age are mixed goods, while knowledge is a simple good. And while the virtues are always present, others are not always present, such as joy and walking. Every good is advantageous, obligatory, profitable, useful, serviceable, noble, beneficial, choice-worthy, and just:

συμφέρον μὲν ὅτι φέρει τοιαῦτα ὧν συμβαινόντων ὠφελούμεθα· δέον δʼ ὅτι συνέχει ἐν οἷς χρή· λυσιτελὲς δʼ ὅτι λύει τὰ τελούμενα εἰς αὐτό, ὥστε τὴν ἀντικατάλλαξιν τὴν ἐκ τῆς πραγματείας ὑπεραίρειν τῇ ὠφελείᾳ1· χρήσιμον δʼ ὅτι χρείαν ὠφελείας παρέχεται· εὔχρηστον δʼ ὅτι τὴν χρείαν ἐπαινετὴν ἀπεργάζεται· καλὸν δʼ ὅτι συμμέτρως ἔχει πρὸς τὴν ἑαυτοῦ χρείαν· ὠφέλιμον δʼ ὅτι τοιοῦτόν ἐστιν ὥστε ὠφελεῖν· αἱρετὸν δʼ ὅτι τοιοῦτόν ἐστιν ὥστε εὐλόγως αὐτὸ αἱρεῖσθαι· δίκαιον δʼ ὅτι νόμῳ ἐστὶ σύμφωνον καὶ κοινωνίας ποιητικόν.

​advantageous, because it brings about such things as through whose occurrence we are benefited; obligatory, because it holds fast in those things where one ought; profitable, because it pays off the expenses laid out upon it, so that the return from the business exceeds in benefit; useful, because it furnishes the use of benefit; serviceable, because it renders its use praiseworthy; noble, because it is well-proportioned to its own use; beneficial, because it is of such a nature as to benefit; choice-worthy, because it is of such a nature that it is reasonably chosen; and just, because it is in harmony with law and productive of community.

Καλὸν δὲ λέγουσι τὸ τέλειον ἀγαθὸν παρὰ τὸ πάντας ἀπέχειν τοὺς ἐπιζητουμένους ἀριθμοὺς ὑπὸ τῆς φύσεως2 ἢ τὸ τελέως σύμμετρον. εἴδη δʼ εἶναι τοῦ καλοῦ τέτταρα, δίκαιον, ἀνδρεῖον, κόσμιον, ἐπιστημονικόν· ἐν γὰρ τοῖσδε τὰς καλὰς πράξεις συντελεῖσθαι. ἀνὰ λόγον δὲ καὶ τοῦ αἰσχροῦ εἶναι εἴδη τέτταρα, τό τʼ ἄδικον καὶ τὸ δειλὸν καὶ ἄκοσμον καὶ ἄφρον. λέγεσθαι δὲ τὸ καλὸν μοναχῶς μὲν τὸ ἐπαινετοὺς παρεχόμενον τοὺς ἔχοντας 〈ἢ〉 ἀγαθὸν ἐπαίνου ἄξιον· ἑτέρως δὲ τὸ εὖ πεφυκέναι πρὸς τὸ ἴδιον ἔργον· ἄλλως δὲ τὸ ἐπικοσμοῦν, ὅταν λέγωμεν μόνον τὸν σοφὸν ἀγαθὸν καὶ καλὸν εἶναι.

​And they call the perfect good “noble” because it possesses in full all the numbers demanded by nature, or because it is completely well-proportioned. And there are four species of the noble: the just, the courageous, the orderly, and the knowledgeable; for in these the noble actions are brought to completion. And proportionally, of the base there are also four species: the unjust, the cowardly, the disorderly, and the foolish. And “noble” is spoken of in one sense as that which renders its possessors praiseworthy, or as a good worthy of praise; in another sense as being well suited by nature for its own proper work; and in yet another sense as that which adorns, as when we say that only the wise man is good and noble.

Λέγουσι δὲ μόνον τὸ καλὸν ἀγαθὸν εἶναι, καθά φησιν Ἑκάτων ἐν τῷ τρίτῳ Περὶ ἀγαθῶν καὶ Χρύσιππος ἐν τοῖς Περὶ τοῦ καλοῦ· εἶναι δὲ τοῦτο ἀρετὴν καὶ τὸ μετέχον ἀρετῆς, ᾧ ἐστιν ἴσον τὸ πᾶν ἀγαθὸν καλὸν εἶναι καὶ τὸ ἰσοδυναμεῖν τῷ καλῷ τὸ ἀγαθόν, ὅπερ ἴσον ἐστὶ τούτῳ3. ἐπεὶ γάρ ἐστιν ἀγαθόν, καλόν ἐστιν· ἔστι δὲ καλόν· ἀγαθὸν ἄρα ἐστί. δοκεῖ δὲ πάντα τὰ ἀγαθὰ ἴσα εἶναι καὶ πᾶν ἀγαθὸν ἐπʼ ἄκρον εἶναι αἱρετὸν καὶ μήτʼ ἄνεσιν μήτʼ ἐπίτασιν ἐπιδέχεσθαι. τῶν δʼ ὄντων φασὶ τὰ μὲν ἀγαθὰ εἶναι, τὰ δὲ κακά, τὰ δʼ οὐδέτερα.

​And they say that the noble alone is good, as Hecato says in the third book of On Goods and Chrysippus in his work On the Noble; and that this is virtue and that which partakes of virtue, with which it is equivalent that every good is noble, and that the good is of equal value to the noble, which is equal to this. For since it is good, it is noble; and it is noble; therefore it is good. And it is held that all goods are equal, and that every good is choice-worthy in the highest degree and admits of neither remission nor intensification. And of existing things they say that some are goods, some are evils, and some are neither.

Ἀγαθὰ μὲν οὖν τάς τʼ ἀρετάς, φρόνησιν, δικαιοσύνην, ἀνδρείαν, σωφροσύνην καὶ τὰ λοιπά· κακὰ δὲ τὰ ἐναντία, ἀφροσύνην, ἀδικίαν καὶ τὰ λοιπά. οὐδέτερα δὲ ὅσα μήτʼ ὠφελεῖ μήτε βλάπτει, οἷον ζωή, ὑγίεια, ἡδονή, κάλλος, ἰσχύς, πλοῦτος, εὐδοξία, εὐγένεια· καὶ τὰ τούτοις ἐναντία, θάνατος, νόσος, πόνος, αἶσχος, ἀσθένεια, πενία, ἀδοξία, δυσγένεια καὶ τὰ τούτοις παραπλήσια, καθά φησιν Ἑκάτων ἐν ἑβδόμῳ Περὶ τέλους καὶ Ἀπολλόδωρος ἐν τῇ Ἠθικῇ καὶ Χρύσιππος. μὴ γὰρ εἶναι ταῦτʼ ἀγαθά, ἀλλʼ ἀδιάφορα κατʼ εἶδος προηγμένα.

​Goods, then, are the virtues: prudence, justice, courage, temperance, and the rest; while evils are their opposites: foolishness, injustice, and the rest. And neither are all those things that neither benefit nor harm, such as life, health, pleasure, beauty, strength, wealth, good repute, noble birth; and their opposites: death, disease, hardship, ugliness, weakness, poverty, disrepute, low birth, and things similar to these, as Hecato says in the seventh book of On the End, and Apollodorus in his Ethics, and Chrysippus. For these are not goods, but preferred indifferents in species.

ὡς γὰρ ἴδιον θερμοῦ τὸ θερμαίνειν, οὐ τὸ ψύχειν, οὕτω καὶ ἀγαθοῦ τὸ ὠφελεῖν, οὐ τὸ βλάπτειν· οὐ μᾶλλον δʼ ὠφελεῖ ἢ βλάπτει ὁ πλοῦτος καὶ ἡ ὑγίεια4· οὐκ ἄρʼ ἀγαθὸν οὔτε πλοῦτος οὔθʼ ὑγίεια. ἔτι τέ φασιν, ᾧ ἔστιν εὖ καὶ κακῶς χρῆσθαι, τοῦτʼ οὐκ ἔστιν ἀγαθόν· πλούτῳ δὲ καὶ ὑγιείᾳ ἔστιν εὖ καὶ κακῶς χρῆσθαι· οὐκ ἄρʼ ἀγαθὸν πλοῦτος καὶ ὑγίεια. Ποσειδώνιος μέντοι καὶ ταῦτά φησι τῶν ἀγαθῶν εἶναι. ἀλλʼ οὐδὲ τὴν ἡδονὴν ἀγαθόν φασιν Ἑκάτων τʼ ἐν τῷ ἐνάτῳ Περὶ ἀγαθῶν καὶ Χρύσιππος ἐν τοῖς Περὶ ἡδονῆς· εἶναι γὰρ καὶ αἰσχρὰς ἡδονάς, μηδὲν δʼ αἰσχρὸν εἶναι ἀγαθόν.

​For just as it is proper to what is hot to heat and not to cool, so also it is proper to the good to benefit and not to harm; but wealth and health do not benefit any more than they harm; therefore neither wealth nor health is a good. Furthermore they say: that which can be used well and badly is not a good; but wealth and health can be used well and badly; therefore wealth and health are not a good. Posidonius, however, says that these also are among the goods. On the other hand, Hecato in the ninth book of On Goods and Chrysippus in his works On Pleasure say that pleasure is not a good either; for there are also base pleasures, and nothing base is a good.

Syntax notes4 items
  1. 7.1.99λυσιτελὲς δʼ ὅτι λύει τὰ τελούμενα εἰς αὐτό, ὥστε τὴν ἀντικατάλλαξιν τὴν ἐκ τῆς πραγματείας ὑπεραίρειν τῇ ὠφελείᾳ

    An etymological definition of λυσιτελής (profitable, paying off). The verb λύει (pays off, liquidates) governs the internal cognate accusative/object τὰ τελούμενα εἰς αὐτό (the expenses paid into it), reflecting the root words λύω + τέλος. In the result clause introduced by ὥστε, τὴν ἀντικατάλλαξιν τὴν ἐκ τῆς πραγματείας is the subject accusative ('the return/exchange resulting from the business'), and τῇ ὠφελείᾳ is a dative of respect ('in benefit') specifying how it exceeds (ὑπεραίρειν) the outlay.

  2. 7.1.100παρὰ τὸ πάντας ἀπέχειν τοὺς ἐπιζητουμένους ἀριθμοὺς ὑπὸ τῆς φύσεως

    The preposition παρά with the accusative articular infinitive (τὸ ... ἀπέχειν) expresses cause ('by reason of / because'). The verb ἀπέχειν here has the sense of 'to possess in full / have received completely'. While τοὺς ἐπιζητουμένους ἀριθμούς is literally 'the numbers demanded', in Stoic idiom it refers to the full tally of constituent parts or requirements necessary for perfection (parallel to Latin omnes numeros habere).

  3. 7.1.101ᾧ ἐστιν ἴσον τὸ πᾶν ἀγαθὸν καλὸν εἶναι καὶ τὸ ἰσοδυναμεῖν τῷ καλῷ τὸ ἀγαθόν, ὅπερ ἴσον ἐστὶ τούτῳ

    A syntactically dense sentence. The relative pronoun ᾧ (dative) refers back to the antecedent doctrine in the preceding clause ('that the noble alone is good'), functioning as the dative complement of ἴσον ἐστίν ('is equivalent to which'). The subjects are the two articular infinitive clauses coordinated by καί: τὸ πᾶν ἀγαθὸν καλὸν εἶναι and τὸ ἰσοδυναμεῖν τῷ καλῷ τὸ ἀγαθόν. The appended clause ὅπερ ἴσον ἐστὶ τούτῳ ('which is equivalent to this') serves as an explanatory relative clause reinforcing the mutual equivalence.

  4. 7.1.103οὐ μᾶλλον δʼ ὠφελεῖ ἢ βλάπτει ὁ πλοῦτος καὶ ἡ ὑγίεια

    The idiomatic comparative formula οὐ μᾶλλον A ἢ B ('no more A than B' / 'not A rather than B'). Here it expresses that wealth and health 'do not benefit any more than they harm', functioning as the minor premise establishing that they cannot be intrinsically good, since they can equally produce the opposite result.

Model: gemini-3.8-flashurn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:7.1.98-7.1.103