- Source
- Diogenes Laertius. Hicks, R. D., editor. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann Ltd., 1925.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.8-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:7.1.109-7.1.113
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-09-28
The passage outlines indifferent actions and the division of appropriate actions into circumstantial/non-circumstantial and perpetual/non-perpetual, before presenting the eight-part soul, the definition of passions, their four primary genera (grief, fear, appetite, pleasure), and their specific subdivisions.
οὔτε δὲ καθήκοντα οὔτε παρὰ τὸ καθῆκον, ὅσα οὔθʼ αἱρεῖ λόγος πράττειν οὔτʼ ἀπαγορεύει, οἷον κάρφος ἀνελέσθαι, γραφεῖον κρατεῖν ἢ στλεγγίδα καὶ τὰ ὅμοια τούτοις. Καὶ τὰ μὲν εἶναι καθήκοντα ἄνευ περιστάσεως, τὰ δὲ περιστατικά. καὶ ἄνευ μὲν περιστάσεως τάδε, ὑγιείας ἐπιμελεῖσθαι καὶ αἰσθητηρίων καὶ τὰ ὅμοια· κατὰ περίστασιν δὲ τὸ πηροῦν ἑαυτὸν καὶ τὴν κτῆσιν διαρριπτεῖν1. ἀνὰ λόγον δὲ καὶ τῶν παρὰ τὸ καθῆκον. ἔτι τῶν καθηκόντων τὰ μὲν ἀεὶ καθήκει, τὰ δὲ οὐκ ἀεί. καὶ ἀεὶ μὲν καθήκει τὸ κατʼ ἀρετὴν ζῆν, οὐκ ἀεὶ δὲ τὸ ἐρωτᾶν καὶ ἀποκρίνεσθαι καὶ περιπατεῖν καὶ τὰ ὅμοια. ὁ δʼ αὐτὸς λόγος καὶ ἐπὶ τῶν παρὰ τὸ καθῆκον.
And neither appropriate actions nor contrary to appropriate action are all those that reason neither urges to do nor forbids, such as picking up a twig, holding a stylus or a scraper, and things similar to these. Moreover, some appropriate actions are without circumstance, while others depend on circumstance. And without circumstance are the following: to care for health and sense organs, and the like; while depending on circumstance are to mutilate oneself and to cast away one's possessions. An analogous proportion holds also for actions contrary to appropriate action. Furthermore, of appropriate actions, some are always appropriate, while others are not always. And always appropriate is to live according to virtue, but not always are questioning, answering, walking, and the like. And the same account applies also to actions contrary to appropriate action.
ἔστι δὲ καὶ ἐν τοῖς μέσοις τι καθῆκον, ὡς τὸ πείθεσθαι τοὺς παῖδας τοῖς παιδαγωγοῖς. Φασὶ δὲ τὴν ψυχὴν εἶναι ὀκταμερῆ· μέρη γὰρ αὐτῆς τά τε πέντε αἰσθητήρια καὶ τὸ φωνητικὸν μόριον καὶ τὸ διανοητικόν, ὅπερ ἐστὶν αὐτὴ ἡ διάνοια, καὶ τὸ γεννητικόν. ἐκ δὲ τῶν ψευδῶν ἐπιγίνεσθαι τὴν διαστροφὴν ἐπὶ τὴν διάνοιαν, ἀφʼ ἧς πολλὰ πάθη βλαστάνειν καὶ ἀκαταστασίας αἴτια. ἔστι δὲ αὐτὸ τὸ πάθος κατὰ Ζήνωνα ἡ ἄλογος καὶ παρὰ φύσιν ψυχῆς κίνησις ἢ ὁρμὴ πλεονάζουσα. Τῶν δὲ παθῶν τὰ ἀνωτάτω, καθά φησιν Ἑκάτων ἐν τῷ δευτέρῳ Περὶ παθῶν καὶ Ζήνων ἐν τῷ Περὶ παθῶν, εἶναι γένη τέτταρα, λύπην, φόβον, ἐπιθυμίαν, ἡδονήν.
There is also a certain appropriate action among those in intermediate conditions, such as children obeying their pedagogues. And they say that the soul has eight parts; for its parts are the five sense organs, the vocal part, the thinking part—which is the intellect itself—and the reproductive part. And from false impressions a perversion arises in the intellect, from which many passions and causes of instability sprout forth. And passion itself, according to Zeno, is an irrational and unnatural movement of the soul, or an excessive impulse. And the highest genera of the passions, as Hecato says in the second book of On Passions and Zeno in On Passions, are four: grief, fear, appetite, and pleasure.
δοκεῖ δʼ αὐτοῖς τὰ πάθη κρίσεις εἶναι, καθά φησι Χρύσιππος ἐν τῷ Περὶ παθῶν· ἥ τε γὰρ φιλαργυρία ὑπόληψίς ἐστι τοῦ τὸ ἀργύριον καλὸν εἶναι, καὶ ἡ μέθη δὲ καὶ ἡ ἀκολασία ὁμοίως καὶ τἄλλα. Καὶ τὴν μὲν λύπην εἶναι συστολὴν ἄλογον· εἴδη δʼ αὐτῆς ἔλεον, φθόνον, ζῆλον, ζηλοτυπίαν, ἄχθος, ἐνόχλησιν, ἀνίαν, ὀδύνην, σύγχυσιν. ἔλεον μὲν οὖν εἶναι λύπην ὡς ἐπʼ ἀναξίως κακοπαθοῦντι, φθόνον δὲ λύπην ἐπʼ ἀλλοτρίοις ἀγαθοῖς, ζῆλον δὲ λύπην ἐπὶ τῷ ἄλλῳ παρεῖναι ὧν αὐτὸς ἐπιθυμεῖ2, ζηλοτυπίαν δὲ λύπην ἐπὶ τῷ καὶ ἄλλῳ παρεῖναι ἃ καὶ αὐτὸς ἔχει,
And they hold that passions are judgments, as Chrysippus says in On Passions; for love of money is a supposition that money is a fine thing, and drunkenness and licentiousness are likewise, and the rest as well. And grief is an irrational contraction; and its species are pity, envy, emulation, jealousy, burden, annoyance, distress, anguish, and confusion. Pity, then, is grief as over someone suffering hardship undeservedly; envy is grief at another’s goods; emulation is grief at another having present to him what one desires for oneself; jealousy is grief at another also having what one also possesses oneself;
ἄχθος δὲ λύπην βαρύνουσαν, ἐνόχλησιν λύπην στενοχωροῦσαν καὶ δυσχωρίαν παρασκευάζουσαν, ἀνίαν λύπην ἐκ διαλογισμῶν μένουσαν ἢ ἐπιτεινομένην, ὀδύνην λύπην ἐπίπονον, σύγχυσιν λύπην ἄλογον, ἀποκναίουσαν καὶ κωλύουσαν τὰ παρόντα συνορᾶν. Ὁ δὲ φόβος ἐστὶ προσδοκία κακοῦ. εἰς δὲ τὸν φόβον ἀνάγεται καὶ ταῦτα, δεῖμα, ὄκνος, αἰσχύνη, ἔκπληξις, θόρυβος, ἀγωνία. δεῖμα μὲν οὖν ἐστι φόβος δέος ἐμποιῶν, αἰσχύνη δὲ φόβος ἀδοξίας, ὄκνος δὲ φόβος μελλούσης ἐνεργείας, ἔκπληξις δὲ φόβος ἐκ φαντασίας ἀσυνήθους πράγματος,
burden is a weighing-down grief; annoyance is a confining grief that produces distress; distress is a grief that remains or intensifies from brooding; anguish is a painful grief; confusion is an irrational grief, grinding down and preventing one from taking a clear view of present circumstances. Fear is the expectation of an evil. And under fear are also brought the following: dread, hesitation, shame, astonishment, perturbation, and anxiety. Dread, then, is a fear inspiring awe; shame is a fear of disrepute; hesitation is a fear of future action; astonishment is a fear arising from an impression of an unusual thing;
θόρυβος δὲ φόβος μετὰ κατεπείξεως φωνῆς, ἀγωνία δὲ φόβος ἀδήλου πράγματος. Ἡ δʼ ἐπιθυμία ἐστὶν ἄλογος ὄρεξις, ὑφʼ ἣν τάττεται καὶ ταῦτα, σπάνις, μῖσος, φιλονεικία, ὀργή, ἔρως, μῆνις, θυμός. ἔστι δʼ ἡ μὲν σπάνις ἐπιθυμία τις ἐν ἀποτεύξει καὶ οἷον κεχωρισμένη ἐκ τοῦ πράγματος, τεταμένη δὲ διακενῆς ἐπʼ αὐτὸ καὶ σπωμένη· μῖσος δʼ ἐστὶν ἐπιθυμία τις τοῦ κακῶς εἶναί τινι μετὰ προκοπῆς τινος καὶ παρατάσεως· φιλονεικία δʼ ἐπιθυμία τις περὶ αἱρέσεως· ὀργὴ δʼ ἐπιθυμία τιμωρίας τοῦ δοκοῦντος ἠδικηκέναι οὐ προσηκόντως· ἔρως δέ ἐστιν ἐπιθυμία τις οὐχὶ περὶ σπουδαίους· ἔστι γὰρ ἐπιβολὴ φιλοποιίας διὰ κάλλος ἐμφαινόμενον3.
perturbation is a fear accompanied by urgent crying; anxiety is a fear of an uncertain thing. And appetite is an irrational desire, under which are also arranged the following: craving, hatred, quarrelsome rivalry, anger, erotic love, wrath, and rage. Craving is a certain desire in failure of attainment and, as it were, separated from the object, yet stretched in vain toward it and drawn to it; hatred is a certain desire that it go ill with someone, accompanied by a certain progress and duration; quarrelsome rivalry is a certain desire concerning choice; anger is a desire for punishment of one who seems to have committed injustice inappropriately; and erotic love is a certain desire not concerned with virtuous persons; for it is an enterprise of friendship-making on account of visible beauty.
- 7.1.109κατὰ περίστασιν δὲ τὸ πηροῦν ἑαυτὸν καὶ τὴν κτῆσιν διαρριπτεῖν
An elliptical construction balancing the preceding sentence: the articular infinitives τὸ πηροῦν... καὶ... διαρριπτεῖν serve as the subject, with the predicate '(are appropriate actions) depending on circumstance' understood from κατὰ περίστασιν, in contrast with ἄνευ μὲν περιστάσεως τάδε.
- 7.1.111ὧν αὐτὸς ἐπιθυμεῖ
Case attraction of the relative pronoun: instead of resolving into an unexpressed antecedent plus accusative (e.g. ἐπὶ τῷ ἄλλῳ παρεῖναι [ταῦτα] ἅ αὐτὸς ἐπιθυμεῖ), the relative pronoun ἅ is attracted into the genitive ὧν required by the verb of its own clause, ἐπιθυμεῖ (which takes a genitive object).
- 7.1.113ἔρως δέ ἐστιν ἐπιθυμία τις οὐχὶ περὶ σπουδαίους· ἔστι γὰρ ἐπιβολὴ φιλοποιίας διὰ κάλλος ἐμφαινόμενον
The negative οὐχὶ modifies the prepositional phrase περὶ σπουδαίους. It indicates that passion-based erotic love does not concern the virtuous; the explanatory sentence that follows (ἔστι γὰρ ἐπιβολὴ φιλοποιίας...) introduces the distinctive Stoic redefinition of proper love as an impulse/enterprise toward making friends prompted by outward beauty.
