- Source
- Diogenes Laertius. Hicks, R. D., editor. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann Ltd., 1925.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.8-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:10.1.91-10.1.96
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-10-01
Epicurus discusses the size, rising and setting, solstices, phases, and face of the sun and moon, as well as eclipses, emphasizing the validity of multiple physical explanations.
“Τὸ δὲ μέγεθος ἡλίου τε καὶ τῶν λοιπῶν ἄστρων κατὰ μὲν τὸ πρὸς ἡμᾶς τηλικοῦτόν ἐστιν ἡλίκον φαίνεται1· [τοῦτο καὶ ἐν τῇ ιαʼ Περὶ φύσεως· εἰ γάρ, φησί, τὸ μέγεθος διὰ τὸ διάστημα ἀπεβεβλήκει, πολλῷ μᾶλλον ἂν τὴν χρόαν. ἄλλο γὰρ τούτῳ συμμετρότερον διάστημα οὐθέν ἐστι.] κατὰ δὲ τὸ καθʼ αὑτὸ ἤτοι μεῖζον τοῦ ὁρωμένου ἢ μικρῷ ἔλαττον ἢ τηλικοῦτον τυγχάνει. οὕτω γὰρ καὶ τὰ παρʼ ἡμῖν πυρὰ ἐξ ἀποστήματος θεωρούμενα κατὰ τὴν αἴσθησιν θεωρεῖται. καὶ πᾶν δὲ εἰς τοῦτο τὸ μέρος ἔνστημα ῥᾳδίως διαλυθήσεται, ἐάν τις τοῖς ἐναργήμασι προσέχῃ, ὅπερ ἐν τοῖς Περὶ φύσεως βιβλίοις δείκνυμεν.
"The size of the sun and the other heavenly bodies, with respect to us, is just as great as it appears; [this is also in the eleventh book On Nature; for he says, 'if it had lost its size on account of distance, it would much more have lost its color; for there is no other distance more proportionate to this than that.'] But with respect to itself, it happens to be either greater than what is seen, or slightly smaller, or of the same size. For in this way fires among us too, when viewed from a distance, are viewed according to perception. And any objection on this point will be easily dissolved if one attends to evident perceptions, as we demonstrate in the books On Nature.
ἀνατολὰς καὶ δύσεις ἡλίου καὶ σελήνης καὶ τῶν λοιπῶν ἄστρων καὶ κατὰ ἄναψιν γενέσθαι δυνατὸν καὶ σβέσιν, τοιαύτης οὔσης περιστάσεως καὶ καθʼ ἑκατέρους τοὺς τόπους, ὥστε τὰ προειρημένα ἀποτελεῖσθαι· οὐδὲν γὰρ τῶν φαινομένων ἀντιμαρτυρεῖ. καὶ κατʼ ἐμφάνειάν τε ὑπὲρ γῆς καὶ πάλιν ἐπιπροσθέτησιν τὸ προειρημένον δύναιτʼ ἂν συντελεῖσθαι· οὐδὲ γάρ τι τῶν φαινομένων ἀντιμαρτυρεῖ. τάς τε κινήσεις αὐτῶν οὐκ ἀδύνατον μὲν γίνεσθαι κατὰ τὴν τοῦ ὅλου οὐρανοῦ δίνην, ἢ τούτου μὲν στάσιν, αὐτῶν δὲ δίνην κατὰ τὴν ἐξ ἀρχῆς ἐν τῇ γενέσει τοῦ κόσμου ἀνάγκην ἀπογεννηθεῖσαν ἐπʼ ἀνατολῇ·
"The risings and settings of the sun, moon, and the other heavenly bodies can occur both by ignition and extinction, circumstances being such in each of the two regions that the aforementioned results are accomplished; for none of the phenomena bears contrary witness. And the aforementioned could also be brought about by appearance above the earth and again by occlusion; for not any of the phenomena bears contrary witness. Nor is it impossible that their motions take place in accordance with the rotation of the whole heaven, or while the latter is at rest, by the rotation of the bodies themselves, generated from the beginning in the birth of the world by necessity in the east;
* * *〈σφοδρο〉τάτῃ θερμασίᾳ κατά τινα ἐπινέμησιν τοῦ πυρὸς ἀεὶ ἐπὶ τοὺς ἑξῆς τόπους ἰόντος. “Τροπὰς ἡλίου καὶ σελήνης ἐνδέχεται μὲν γίνεσθαι κατὰ λόξωσιν οὐρανοῦ οὕτω τοῖς χρόνοις κατηναγκασμένου· ὁμοίως δὲ καὶ κατὰ ἀέρος ἀντέξωσιν ἢ καὶ ὕλης ἀεὶ ἐπιτηδείας τῆς μὲν ἐχομένης ἐμπιπραμένης τῆς δʼ ἐκλιπούσης· ἢ καὶ ἐξ ἀρχῆς τοιαύτην δίνην κατειληθῆναι τοῖς ἄστροις τούτοις, ὥσθʼ οἷόν τινʼ ἕλικα κινεῖσθαι. πάντα γὰρ τὰ τοιαῦτα καὶ τὰ τούτοις συγγενῆ οὐθενὶ τῶν ἐναργημάτων διαφωνεῖ, ἐάν τις ἀεὶ ἐπὶ τῶν τοιούτων μερῶν, ἐχόμενος τοῦ δυνατοῦ, εἰς τὸ σύμφωνον τοῖς φαινομένοις ἕκαστον τούτων δύνηται ἐπάγειν2, μὴ φοβούμενος τὰς ἀνδραποδώδεις ἀστρολόγων τεχνιτείας.
... by the most intense heat, according to a certain grazing spread of fire advancing always to adjacent places. "The turnings of the sun and moon admit of coming to be by the obliquity of heaven, constrained in this way by the seasons; likewise also by the counter-pressure of air, or even by appropriate fuel, as the adjacent material is always ignited while what is spent fails; or even because from the beginning such a rotation was wrapped into these heavenly bodies so as to move in a kind of spiral. For all such explanations and those akin to them are in disagreement with none of the evident perceptions, if one always holds fast to the possible in such matters and is able to bring each of these into harmony with the phenomena, not fearing the slavish contrivances of the astrologers.
“Κένωσίς τε σελήνης καὶ πάλιν πλήρωσις καὶ κατὰ στροφὴν τοῦ σώματος τούτου δύναιτʼ ἂν γίνεσθαι καὶ κατὰ σχηματισμοὺς ἀέρος ὁμοίως, ἔτι τε καὶ κατʼ ἐμπροσθετήσεις καὶ κατὰ πάντας τρόπους, καθʼ οὓς καὶ τὰ παρʼ ἡμῖν φαινόμενα ἐκκαλεῖται εἰς τὰς τοῦ εἴδους τούτου ἀποδόσεις, ἐὰν μή τις τὸν μοναχῆ τρόπον κατηγαπηκὼς τοὺς ἄλλους κενῶς ἀποδοκιμάζῃ3, οὐ τεθεωρηκὼς τί δυνατὸν ἀνθρώπῳ θεωρῆσαι καὶ τί ἀδύνατον, καὶ διὰ τοῦτʼ ἀδύνατα θεωρεῖν ἐπιθυμῶν. ἔτι τε ἐνδέχεται τὴν σελήνην ἐξ ἑαυτῆς ἔχειν τὸ φῶς, ἐνδέχεται δὲ ἀπὸ τοῦ ἡλίου.
"The waning of the moon and its waxing again could occur both by the rotation of this body and likewise by the formations of air, and furthermore by obstructions and in all the ways in which the phenomena among us also invite explanations of this kind—provided one has not become enamored of the single method and empty-mindedly rejected the others, having failed to observe what is possible for a human being to observe and what is impossible, and on this account desiring to observe impossibilities. Furthermore, it is possible for the moon to have its light from itself, and it is possible to have it from the sun.
καὶ γὰρ παρʼ ἡμῖν θεωρεῖται πολλὰ μὲν ἐξ ἑαυτῶν ἔχοντα, πολλὰ δὲ ἀφʼ ἑτέρων. καὶ οὐθὲν ἐμποδοστατεῖ τῶν ἐν τοῖς μετεώροις φαινομένων, ἐάν τις τοῦ πλεοναχοῦ τρόπου ἀεὶ μνήμην ἔχῃ καὶ τὰς ἀκολούθους αὐτοῖς ὑποθέσεις ἅμα καὶ αἰτίας συνθεωρῇ καὶ μὴ ἀναβλέπων εἰς τὰ ἀνακόλουθα ταῦτʼ ὀγκοῖ ματαίως καὶ καταρρέπῃ ἄλλοτε ἄλλως ἐπὶ τὸν μοναχὸν τρόπον. ἡ δὲ ἔμφασις τοῦ προσώπου ἐν αὐτῇ δύναται μὲν γίνεσθαι καὶ κατὰ παραλλαγὴν μερῶν καὶ κατʼ ἐπιπροσθέτησιν, καὶ ὅσοι ποτʼ ἂν τρόποι θεωροῖντο τὸ σύμφωνον τοῖς φαινομένοις κεκτημένοι.
For among us too many things are observed to possess light from themselves, and many from other things. And none of the phenomena in the heavens stands as an obstacle, if one always holds in memory the multiple method and contemplates together with them the attendant hypotheses and causes, and does not, by gazing toward what is inconsistent, vainly puff these matters up and incline now this way, now that toward the single method. The appearance of the face in it can occur both by the variation of parts and by occlusion, and by whatever ways might be observed that possess harmony with the phenomena.
ἐπὶ πάντων γὰρ τῶν μετεώρων τὴν τοιαύτην ἴχνευσιν οὐ προετέον. ἢν γάρ τις ᾖ μαχόμενος τοῖς ἐναργήμασιν, οὐδέποτε δυνήσεται ἀταραξίας γνησίου μεταλαβεῖν. “Ἔκλειψις ἡλίου καὶ σελήνης δύναται μὲν γίνεσθαι καὶ κατὰ σβένσιν, καθάπερ καὶ παρʼ ἡμῖν τοῦτο θεωρεῖται γιγνόμενον· καὶ ἤδη καὶ κατʼ ἐπιπροσθέτησιν ἄλλων τινῶν, ἢ γῆς ἢ ἀοράτου τινὸς ἑτέρου τοιούτου. καὶ ὧδε τοὺς οἰκείους ἀλλήλοις τρόπους συνθεωρητέον, καὶ τὰς ἅμα συγκυρήσεις τινῶν ὅτι οὐκ ἀδύνατον γίνεσθαι4. [ἐν δὲ τῇ ιβʼ Περὶ φύσεως ταῦτα λέγει καὶ πρός, ἥλιον ἐκλείπειν σελήνης ἐπισκοτούσης, σελήνην δὲ τοῦ τῆς γῆς σκιάσματος, ἀλλὰ καὶ κατʼ ἀναχώρησιν.
For in the case of all celestial phenomena such tracking must not be abandoned; for if one fights against evident perceptions, he will never be able to partake of genuine tranquility. "An eclipse of the sun and moon can occur both by extinction, just as this is observed to happen among us, and also already by the occlusion of certain other bodies, either of the earth or of some other invisible entity of this kind. And in this manner one must contemplate together the methods akin to one another, and that the simultaneous coincidences of certain occurrences are not impossible. [And in the twelfth book On Nature he says these things, and in addition that the sun is eclipsed when the moon casts a shadow, and the moon by the shadow of the earth, but also by retreat.]
- 10.1.91κατὰ μὲν τὸ πρὸς ἡμᾶς τηλικοῦτόν ἐστιν ἡλίκον φαίνεται
Epicurus' notorious thesis that 'relative to us, it is as large as it appears'. κατὰ μὲν τὸ πρὸς ἡμᾶς (apparent size relative to the observer) is contrasted with κατὰ δὲ τὸ καθʼ αὑτό (absolute size in itself).
- 10.1.93ἐὰν τις ... εἰς τὸ σύμφωνον τοῖς φαινομένοις ἕκαστον τούτων δύνηται ἐπάγειν
Within the conditional clause ἐάν τις ... δύνηται, the participle phrases ἐχόμενος τοῦ δυνατοῦ ('holding fast to the possible') and the negative participle phrase μὴ φοβούμενος τὰς ἀνδραποδώδεις ἀστρολόγων τεχνιτείας ('not fearing the slavish contrivances of the astrologers') modify the main verb δύνηται. ἐπάγειν means 'to bring to' or 'apply to'.
- 10.1.94ἐὰν μή τις ... κενῶς ἀποδοκιμάζῃ
In the negative conditional clause ἐὰν μή τις ... ἀποδοκιμάζῃ ('unless someone ... emptily rejects'), the perfect participles κατηγαπηκώς ('having become enamored of') and τεθεωρηκώς ('having observed'), together with the present participle ἐπιθυμῶν ('desiring'), successively depict the psychology and behavior of dogmatists who cling to a single explanation.
- 10.1.96καὶ τὰς ἅμα συγκυρήσεις τινῶν ὅτι οὐκ ἀδύνατον γίνεσθαι
Alongside the noun phrase τοὺς οἰκείους ἀλλήλοις τρόπους, the verbal adjective συνθεωρητέον governs a proleptic accusative construction: τὰς ἅμα συγκυρήσεις τινῶν ὅτι οὐκ ἀδύνατον γίνεσθαι ('and [one must contemplate] that the simultaneous coincidences of certain occurrences are not impossible').
