- Source
- Diogenes Laertius. Hicks, R. D., editor. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann Ltd., 1925.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.8-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:10.1.85-10.1.90
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-10-01
Epicurus explains to Pythocles that the sole end of studying celestial phenomena is tranquility of mind, laying down the methodological principle of multiple explanations. He then provides a physical account of the definition of a world, the generation of infinite worlds, and the formation of celestial bodies.
γράψαντες οὖν τὰ λοιπὰ πάντα συντελοῦμεν ἅπερ ἠξίωσας πολλοῖς καὶ ἄλλοις ἐσόμενα χρήσιμα τὰ διαλογίσματα ταῦτα, καὶ μάλιστα τοῖς νεωστὶ φυσιολογίας γνησίου γεγευμένοις καὶ τοῖς εἰς ἀσχολίας βαθυτέρας τῶν ἐγκυκλίων τινὸς ἐμπεπλεγμένοις. καλῶς δὴ αὐτὰ διάλαβε, καὶ διὰ μνήμης ἔχων ὀξέως αὐτὰ περιόδευε μετὰ τῶν λοιπῶν ὧν ἐν τῇ μικρᾷ ἐπιτομῇ πρὸς Ἡρόδοτον ἀπεστείλαμεν. “Πρῶτον μὲν οὖν μὴ ἄλλο τι τέλος ἐκ τῆς περὶ μετεώρων γνώσεως εἴτε κατὰ συναφὴν λεγομένων εἴτε αὐτοτελῶς νομίζειν εἶναι1 ἤπερ ἀταραξίαν καὶ πίστιν βέβαιον, καθάπερ καὶ ἐπὶ τῶν λοιπῶν.
Having therefore written all the rest, we fulfill what you requested, these reflections being likely to be useful to many others as well, and especially to those who have recently tasted genuine inquiry into nature and those entangled in deeper preoccupations with ordinary education. Comprehend them thoroughly, therefore, and holding them in memory, run through them swiftly together with the rest that we sent in the short epitome to Herodotus. "First of all, then, do not believe that there is any other end to be obtained from the knowledge of celestial phenomena—whether treated in connection with other topics or independently—than tranquility and firm conviction, just as is the case with the rest of our studies.
μήτε τὸ ἀδύνατον παραβιάζεσθαι μήτε ὁμοίαν κατὰ πάντα τὴν θεωρίαν ἔχειν ἢ τοῖς περὶ βίων λόγοις ἢ τοῖς κατὰ τὴν τῶν ἄλλων φυσικῶν προβλημάτων κάθαρσιν, οἷον ὅτι τὸ πᾶν σώματα καὶ ἀναφὴς φύσις ἐστίν, ἢ ὅτι ἄτομα 〈τὰ〉 στοιχεῖα, καὶ πάντα τὰ τοιαῦτα ὅσα μοναχὴν ἔχει τοῖς φαινομένοις συμφωνίαν· ὅπερ ἐπὶ τῶν μετεώρων οὐχ ὑπάρχει, ἀλλὰ ταῦτά γε πλεοναχὴν ἔχει καὶ τῆς γενέσεως αἰτίαν καὶ τῆς οὐσίας ταῖς αἰσθήσεσι σύμφωνον κατηγορίαν.
Do not force what is impossible, nor maintain in every respect a mode of inquiry identical either with the discourses concerning ways of life or with the solutions of the other physical problems, such as that the universe is bodies and intangible nature, or that the elements are indivisible bodies, and all such matters as have a unique correspondence with the phenomena. This unique correspondence does not hold in the case of celestial phenomena; rather, these possess both a multiple cause of their coming into being and a predicate of their essence that accords with the senses.
“Οὐ γὰρ κατὰ ἀξιώματα κενὰ καὶ νομοθεσίας φυσιολογητέον, ἀλλʼ ὡς τὰ φαινόμενα ἐκκαλεῖται· οὐ γὰρ ἤδη ἀλογίας καὶ κενῆς δόξης ὁ βίος ἡμῶν ἔχει χρείαν, ἀλλὰ τοῦ ἀθορύβως ἡμᾶς ζῆν. πάντα μὲν οὖν γίνεται ἀσείστως καί, πάντων κατὰ πλεοναχὸν τρόπον ἐκκαθαιρομένων, συμφώνως τοῖς φαινομένοις, ὅταν τις τὸ πιθανολογούμενον ὑπὲρ αὐτῶν δεόντως καταλίπῃ2· ὅταν δέ τις τὸ μὲν ἀπολίπῃ, τὸ δὲ ἐκβάλῃ ὁμοίως σύμφωνον ὂν τῷ φαινομένῳ, δῆλον ὅτι καὶ ἐκ παντὸς ἐκπίπτει φυσιολογήματος ἐπὶ δὲ τὸν μῦθον καταρρεῖ. σημεῖα δὲ ἐπὶ τῶν ἐν τοῖς μετεώροις συντελουμένων φέρειν τῶν παρʼ ἡμῖν τινα φαινομένων, ἃ θεωρεῖται ᾗ ὑπάρχει, καὶ οὐ τὰ ἐν τοῖς μετεώροις φαινόμενα· ταῦτα γὰρ ἐνδέχεται πλεοναχῶς γενέσθαι.
"For we must not study nature in accordance with empty axioms and arbitrary legislation, but as the phenomena demand. For our life has no need now of unreason and empty opinion, but of our living without disturbance. All things, therefore, take place unshakably, and all matters are explained in a multiple manner in accordance with the phenomena, whenever one duly leaves room for what is plausibly said concerning them; but whenever one accepts one explanation and rejects another that is equally in accordance with the phenomenon, it is evident that he falls completely outside of natural science and slips into myth. Moreover, one must bring forward as signs for the occurrences accomplished in the heavens certain phenomena observed among us, which are seen in the way they exist, and not the celestial phenomena themselves; for the latter admit of coming to be in multiple ways.
τὸ μέντοι φάντασμα ἑκάστου τηρητέον καὶ ἔτι τὰ συναπτόμενα τούτῳ διαιρετέον, ἃ οὐκ ἀντιμαρτυρεῖται τοῖς παρʼ ἡμῖν γινομένοις πλεοναχῶς συντελεῖσθαι. “Κόσμος ἐστὶ περιοχή τις οὐρανοῦ, ἄστρα τε καὶ γῆν καὶ πάντα τὰ φαινόμενα περιέχουσα, ἀποτομὴν ἔχουσα ἀπὸ τοῦ ἀπείρου καὶ λήγουσα [καὶ καταλήγουσα ἐν πέρατι ἢ ἀραιῷ ἢ πυκνῷ καὶ οὗ λυομένου πάντα τὰ ἐν αὐτῷ σύγχυσιν λήψεται.] ἢ ἐν περιαγομένῳ ἢ ἐν στάσιν ἔχοντι καὶ στρογγύλην ἢ τρίγωνον ἢ οἵαν δήποτε περιγραφήν· πανταχῶς γὰρ ἐνδέχεται· τῶν γὰρ φαινομένων οὐδὲν ἀντιμαρτυρεῖ 〈ἐν〉 τῷδε τῷ κόσμῳ, ἐν ᾧ λῆγον οὐκ ἔστι καταλαβεῖν.
Nevertheless, the appearance of each phenomenon must be preserved, and one must distinguish the elements connected with it, which are not testified against by what happens among us as being accomplished in multiple ways. "A world is a circumscribed section of heaven, encompassing heavenly bodies and earth and all visible phenomena, having a severance from the infinite and terminating [and ending at a limit either rare or dense, at the dissolution of which all things within it will undergo confusion] either in a boundary revolving or in one maintaining rest, and having a circular, triangular, or any kind of contour whatsoever. For it is possible in every way; for none of the phenomena bears contrary witness in this world, in which its termination cannot be grasped.
“Ὅτι δὲ καὶ τοιοῦτοι κόσμοι εἰσὶν ἄπειροι τὸ πλῆθος ἔστι καταλαβεῖν, καὶ ὅτι καὶ ὁ τοιοῦτος δύναται κόσμος γίνεσθαι καὶ ἐν κόσμῳ καὶ μετακοσμίῳ, ὃ λέγομεν μεταξὺ κόσμων διάστημα, ἐν πολυκένῳ τόπῳ καὶ οὐκ ἐν μεγάλῳ εἰλικρινεῖ καὶ κενῷ, καθάπερ τινές φασιν, ἐπιτηδείων τινῶν σπερμάτων ῥυέντων ἀφʼ ἑνὸς κόσμου ἢ μετακοσμίου ἢ καὶ ἀπὸ πλειόνων κατὰ μικρὸν προσθέσεις τε καὶ διαρθρώσεις καὶ μεταστάσεις ποιούντων3 ἐπʼ ἄλλον τόπον, ἐὰν οὕτω τύχῃ, καὶ ἐπαρδεύσεις ἐκ τῶν ἐχόντων ἐπιτηδείως ἕως τελειώσεως καὶ διαμονῆς ἐφʼ ὅσον τὰ ὑποβληθέντα θεμέλια τὴν προσδοχὴν δύναται ποιεῖσθαι.
"That such worlds are also infinite in number can be comprehended, and that such a world can come into being both within a world and in an interworld—by which we mean the space between worlds—in a place containing much void, and not in a vast pure void, as some say. This occurs when certain suitable seeds have flowed from a single world or interworld, or from several, gradually effecting additions, articulations, and transpositions to another place, if it so happens, and irrigations from things appropriately disposed, until completion and permanence are achieved, for as long as the underlying foundations are able to sustain the reception.
οὐ γὰρ ἀθροισμὸν δεῖ μόνον γενέσθαι οὐδὲ δῖνον ἐν ᾧ ἐνδέχεται κόσμον γίνεσθαι κενῷ κατὰ τὸ δοξαζόμενον ἐξ ἀνάγκης αὔξεσθαί τε, ἕως ἂν ἑτέρῳ προσκρούσῃ, καθάπερ τῶν φυσικῶν καλουμένων φησί τις· τοῦτο γὰρ μαχόμενόν ἐστι τοῖς φαινομένοις. “Ἥλιός τε καὶ σελήνη καὶ τὰ λοιπὰ ἄστρα οὐ καθʼ ἑαυτὰ γενόμενα ὕστερον ἐμπεριελαμβάνετο ὑπὸ τοῦ κόσμου [καὶ ὅσα γε δὴ σῴζει], ἀλλʼ εὐθὺς διεπλάττετο καὶ αὔξησιν ἐλάμβανεν [ὁμοίως δὲ καὶ γῆ καὶ θάλαττα] κατὰ προσκρίσεις καὶ δινήσεις λεπτομερῶν τινων φύσεων, ἤτοι πνευματικῶν ἢ πυροειδῶν ἢ συναμφοτέρων· καὶ γὰρ ταῦτα οὕτως ἡ αἴσθησις ὑποβάλλει.
For there must not merely be an accumulation, nor a vortex in the void in which it is possible for a world to arise, growing by necessity according to the accepted opinion until it collides with another, as someone among the so-called natural philosophers says; for this is in conflict with the phenomena. "The sun, the moon, and the other heavenly bodies did not come into being independently and were only afterward enclosed by the world [along with whatever else it preserves]; rather, they were molded and received their growth from the beginning [and likewise earth and sea] through the accretions and rotations of certain fine-particled entities, either airy or fiery or both; for perception suggests these things to us in this way."
- 10.1.85μὴ ἄλλο τι τέλος... νομίζειν εἶναι
An imperatival infinitive construction (infinitive used for the imperative), reinforced by μή. The subsequent infinitives in §10.1.86 (μήτε τὸ ἀδύνατον παραβιάζεσθαι μήτε... ἔχειν) continue this syntactical pattern, setting out prescriptive methodological injunctions after the explicit imperative καλῶς διάλαβε.
- 10.1.87ὅταν τις τὸ πιθανολογούμενον ὑπὲρ αὐτῶν δεόντως καταλίπῃ
The verb καταλίπῃ signifies 'to leave room for' or 'duly admit', forming a contrast with the subsequent clause ὅταν δέ τις τὸ μὲν ἀπολίπῃ, τὸ δὲ ἐκβάλῃ ('whenever one leaves [accepts] one but rejects another'). In Epicurus' method of multiple explanations, it denotes properly leaving open all plausible accounts consistent with phenomena rather than dogmatically fixing on a single one.
- 10.1.89ἐπιτηδείων τινῶν σπερμάτων ῥυέντων... ποιούντων
A genitive absolute construction initiated by ἐπιτηδείων τινῶν σπερμάτων ῥυέντων. The subsequent participle ποιούντων agrees grammatically in the neuter plural genitive with σπερμάτων, denoting the action of the seeds causing additions, articulations, and transpositions toward completion (ἕως τελειώσεως).
