- Source
- Diogenes Laertius. Hicks, R. D., editor. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann Ltd., 1925.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.8-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:10.1.80-10.1.84
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-10-01
Epicurus concludes his Letter to Herodotus by explaining how natural philosophy and the doctrine of multiple causes secure mental tranquility (ataraxia), and then begins his Letter to Pythocles in response to a request for an epitome of celestial phenomena.
οὐ δεῖ νομίζειν τὴν ὑπὲρ τούτων χρείαν ἀκρίβειαν μὴ ἀπειληφέναι1, ὅση πρὸς τὸ ἀτάραχον καὶ μακάριον ἡμῶν συντείνει. ὥστε παραθεωροῦντας ποσαχῶς παρʼ ἡμῖν τὸ ὅμοιον γίνεται, αἰτιολογητέον ὑπέρ τε τῶν μετεώρων καὶ παντὸς τοῦ ἀδήλου, καταφρονοῦντας τῶν οὔτε τὸ μοναχῶς ἔχον ἢ γινόμενον γνωριζόντων οὔτε τὸ πλεοναχῶς συμβαῖνον, τὴν ἐκ τῶν ἀποστημάτων φαντασίαν παριδόντων, ἔτι τε ἀγνοούντων καὶ ἐν ποίοις οὐκ ἐστιν ἀταρακτῆσαι 〈καὶ ἐν ποίοις ὁμοίως ἀταρακτῆσαι.〉 ἂν οὖν οἰώμεθα καὶ ὡδί πως ἐνδεχόμενον αὐτὸ γίνεσθαι, αὐτὸ τὸ ὅτι πλεοναχῶς γίνεται γνωρίζοντες, ὥσπερ κἂν ὅτι ὡδί πως γίνεται εἴδωμεν, ἀταρακτήσομεν.
one must not believe that our need concerning these matters has not received all the precision that contributes to our tranquility and blessedness. Wherefore, observing in parallel in how many ways the similar occurs among us, we must give causal explanations both for celestial phenomena and for everything unobserved, holding in contempt those who recognize neither that which is or comes to be in a single way, nor that which happens in multiple ways, having overlooked the presentation arising from distances, and moreover being ignorant both in what matters it is not possible to be untroubled 〈and in what matters it is likewise possible to be untroubled.〉 If therefore we believe that it is possible for it to happen in this way too, knowing the very fact that it happens in multiple ways, just as if we also knew that it happens in this particular way, we shall be untroubled.
“Ἐπὶ δὲ τούτοις ὅλως ἅπασιν ἐκεῖνο δεῖ κατανοεῖν, ὅτι τάραχος ὁ κυριώτατος ταῖς ἀνθρωπίναις ψυχαῖς γίνεται ἐν τῷ ταῦτά τε μακάρια δοξάζειν 〈εἶναι〉 καὶ ἄφθαρτα, καὶ ὑπεναντίας ἔχειν τούτῳ βουλήσεις ἅμα καὶ πράξεις καὶ αἰτίας, καὶ ἐν τῷ αἰώνιόν τι δεινὸν ἀεὶ προσδοκᾶν ἢ ὑποπτεύειν κατὰ τοὺς μύθους εἴ τε καὶ αὐτὴν τὴν ἀναισθησίαν τὴν ἐν τῷ τεθνάναι φοβουμένους2 ὥσπερ οὖσαν κατʼ αὐτούς, καὶ ἐν τῷ μὴ δόξαις ταῦτα πάσχειν ἀλλʼ ἀλόγῳ γέ τινι παραστάσει, ὅθεν μὴ ὁρίζοντας τὸ δεινὸν τὴν ἴσην ἢ καὶ ἐπιτεταμένην ταραχὴν λαμβάνειν τῷ εἰκαίως δοξάζοντι ταῦτα·
"In all these matters generally, one must comprehend this: that the most sovereign disturbance occurs in human souls by holding opinions that these bodies are blessed 〈and〉 incorruptible, while simultaneously attributing to them volitions, actions, and causal motives contrary to such a state; and by constantly expecting or suspecting some everlasting terror in accordance with the myths, or even fearing the very lack of sensation in death as though it were an actual state concerning themselves; and by suffering these things not by reasoned opinion but through some irrational impression, whence, failing to define the limit of terror, they take on equal or even intensified disturbance compared to one who merely holds these opinions at random.
ἡ δὲ ἀταραξία τὸ τούτων πάντων ἀπολελύσθαι καὶ συνεχῆ μνήμην ἔχειν τῶν ὅλων καὶ κυριωτάτων. “Ὅθεν τοῖς πάθεσι προσεκτέον τοῖς παροῦσι, κατὰ μὲν τὸ κοινὸν ταῖς κοιναῖς, κατὰ δὲ τὸ ἴδιον ταῖς ἰδίαις, καὶ πάσῃ τῇ παρούσῃ καθʼ ἕκαστον τῶν κριτηρίων ἐναργείᾳ. ἂν γὰρ τούτοις προσέχωμεν, τὸ ὅθεν ὁ τάραχος καὶ ὁ φόβος ἐγίνετο ἐξαιτιολογήσομεν ὀρθῶς καὶ ἀπολύσομεν, ὑπέρ τε μετεώρων αἰτιολογοῦντες καὶ τῶν λοιπῶν τῶν ἀεὶ παρεμπιπτόντων, ὅσα φοβεῖ τοὺς λοιποὺς ἐσχάτως. “Ταῦτά σοι, ὦ Ἡρόδοτε, ἔστι κεφαλαιωδέστατα ὑπὲρ τῆς τῶν ὅλων φύσεως ἐπιτετμημένα.
Tranquility, on the other hand, consists in having been released from all these things and in maintaining a continuous memory of the general and most sovereign doctrines. "Hence, one must pay attention to present feelings—to common perceptions in accordance with what is common, and to peculiar perceptions in accordance with what is peculiar—and to all present clear evidence according to each of the criteria. For if we attend to these, we shall correctly assign the cause of the source whence disturbance and fear arose and dissolve them, giving causal explanations both for celestial phenomena and for the remaining occurrences that continually happen, which terrify the rest of mankind to the utmost degree. "These, O Herodotus, are for you the most summary epitomes concerning the nature of all things.
ὥστʼ ἐὰν γένηται δυνατὸς ὁ λόγος οὗτος κατασχεθεὶς μετʼ ἀκριβείας3, οἶμαι, ἐὰν μὴ καὶ πρὸς ἅπαντα βαδίσῃ τις τῶν κατὰ μέρος ἀκριβωμάτων, ἀσύμβλητον αὐτὸν πρὸς τοὺς λοιποὺς ἀνθρώπους ἁδρότητα λήψεσθαι. καὶ γὰρ καὶ καθαρὰ ἀφʼ ἑαυτοῦ ποιήσει πολλὰ τῶν κατὰ μέρος ἐξακριβουμένων κατὰ τὴν ὅλην πραγματείαν ἡμῖν, καὶ αὐτὰ ταῦτα ἐν μνήμῃ τιθέμενα συνεχῶς βοηθήσει. “Τοιαῦτα γάρ ἐστιν, ὥστε καὶ τοὺς κατὰ μέρος ἤδη ἐξακριβοῦντας ἱκανῶς ἢ καὶ τελείως, εἰς τὰς τοιαύτας ἀναλύοντας ἐπιβολάς, τὰς πλείστας τῶν περιοδειῶν ὑπὲρ τῆς ὅλης φύσεως ποιεῖσθαι· ὅσοι δὲ μὴ παντελῶς τῶν ἀποτελουμένων4 εἰσίν, ἐκ τούτων καὶ κατὰ τὸν ἄνευ φθόγγων τρόπον τὴν ἅμα νοήματι περίοδον τῶν κυριωτάτων πρὸς γαληνισμὸν ποιοῦνται. Καὶ ἥδε μέν ἐστιν αὐτῷ ἐπιστολὴ περὶ τῶν φυσικῶν. περὶ δὲ τῶν μετεώρων ἥδε. “Ἐπίκουρος Πυθοκλεῖ χαίρειν.
Wherefore, if this discourse should prove capable of being grasped with precision, I think that even if one does not advance to all the detailed precisions, he will acquire an incomparable vigor in relation to the rest of mankind. For it will of itself make clear many of the points investigated in detail throughout our entire treatise, and these very principles, continuously kept in memory, will provide aid. "For they are of such a kind that even those who already investigate the particulars adequately or completely, by analyzing them into such comprehensive conceptions, make most of their surveys concerning the whole of nature; while as many as do not fully belong to the accomplished class make from these, and in a silent manner, their survey of the most sovereign points simultaneously with thought, toward serenity." And this is his letter on natural philosophy. The one on celestial phenomena is as follows: "Epicurus to Pythocles, greetings.
“Ἤνεγκέ μοι Κλέων ἐπιστολὴν παρά σου, ἐν ᾗ φιλοφρονούμενός τε περὶ ἡμᾶς διετέλεις ἀξίως τῆς ἡμετέρας περὶ σεαυτὸν σπουδῆς καὶ οὐκ ἀπιθάνως ἐπειρῶ μνημονεύειν τῶν εἰς μακάριον βίον συντεινόντων διαλογισμῶν, ἐδέου τε σεαυτῷ περὶ τῶν μετεώρων σύντομον καὶ εὐπερίγραφον διαλογισμὸν ἀποστεῖλαι, ἵνα ῥᾳδίως μνημονεύῃς· τὰ γὰρ ἐν ἄλλοις ἡμῖν γεγραμμένα δυσμνημόνευτα εἶναι, καί τοι, ὡς ἔφης, συνεχῶς αὐτὰ βαστάζεις. ἡμεῖς δὲ ἡδέως τέ σου τὴν δέησιν ἀπεδεξάμεθα καὶ ἐλπίσιν ἡδείαις συνεσχέθημεν.
Cleon brought me a letter from you, in which you continued to feel affectionately toward us in a manner worthy of our zeal for you, and were striving not unpersuasively to remember the reflections contributing to a blessed life, and requested that a concise and easily circumscribed reflection concerning celestial phenomena be sent to you, so that you might easily remember it; for what has been written by us elsewhere is difficult to remember, even though, as you said, you constantly carry it about with you. We gladly welcomed your request and were held by pleasant hopes.
- 10.1.80τὴν ὑπὲρ τούτων χρείαν ἀκρίβειαν μὴ ἀπειληφέναι
In the noun phrase τὴν ὑπὲρ τούτων χρείαν ἀκρίβειαν, the adjective χρεία modifies ἀκρίβειαν ('the requisite precision', 'the needed accuracy'). The negative μή negates the infinitive ἀπειληφέναι, creating a double negative with the preceding οὐ δεῖ νομίζειν ('one must not believe that it has not received...' = 'one must believe that it has indeed received...').
- 10.1.81φοβουμένους
The accusative plural participle φοβουμένους is an instance of anacoluthon or case attraction to the implicit subject of the preceding articular infinitives (ἐν τῷ ... προσδοκᾶν ἢ ὑποπτεύειν). The implied general agent ('human beings') is expressed in the accusative plural rather than remaining coordinated in the dative or genitive.
- 10.1.83ἐὰν γένηται δυνατὸς ὁ λόγος οὗτος κατασχεθεὶς μετʼ ἀκριβείας
The adjective δυνατός agrees in gender, number, and case with the subject ὁ λόγος οὗτος, accompanied by the passive participle κατασχεθείς, functioning like a personal construction equivalent to an impersonal δυνατὸν ᾖ + infinitive ('if this discourse should prove capable of being grasped with precision').
- 10.1.83τῶν ἀποτελουμένων
The medio-passive participle τῶν ἀποτελουμένων is a partitive genitive or genitive of rubric/class ('those who are being fully formed/accomplished'). The clause ὅσοι δὲ μὴ παντελῶς τῶν ἀποτελουμένων εἰσίν thus contrasts non-experts or advancing students with those who have already achieved mastery.
