- Source
- Diogenes Laertius. Hicks, R. D., editor. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann Ltd., 1925.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.8-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:10.1.74-10.1.79
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-10-01
Epicurus discusses the diversity of world shapes and the natural origin followed by conventional development of language, rejects attributing celestial phenomena to gods or conscious fiery bodies, and argues that investigating primary causes through physics, rather than mere astronomical observations, secures blessed tranquility.
“Ἔτι δὲ καὶ τοὺς κόσμους οὔτε ἐξ ἀνάγκης δεῖ νομίζειν ἕνα σχηματισμὸν ἔχοντας * * [ἀλλὰ καὶ διαφόρους αὐτοὺς ἐν τῇ ιβʼ Περὶ φύσεως αὐτός φησιν· οὓς μὲν γὰρ σφαιροειδεῖς, καὶ ᾠοειδεῖς ἄλλους, καὶ ἀλλοιοσχήμονας ἑτέρους· οὐ μέντοι πᾶν σχῆμα ἔχειν. οὐδὲ ζῷα εἶναι ἀποκριθέντα ἀπὸ τοῦ ἀπείρου.] οὐδὲ γὰρ ἂν ἀποδείξειεν οὐδείς, ὡς 〈ἐν〉 μὲν τῷ τοιούτῳ καὶ οὐκ ἂν ἐμπεριελήφθη τὰ τοιαῦτα σπέρματα, ἐξ ὧν ζῷά τε καὶ φυτὰ καὶ τὰ λοιπὰ πάντα 〈τὰ〉 θεωρούμενα συνίσταται, ἐν δὲ τῷ τοιούτῳ οὐκ ἂν ἐδυνήθη. [ὡσαύτως δὲ καὶ ἐντραφῆναι. τὸν αὐτὸν δὲ τρόπον καὶ ἐπὶ γῆς νομιστέον.]
"Furthermore, one must not believe that worlds of necessity have one single shape * * [but he himself says in the twelfth book of On Nature that they are also diverse; for some are spherical, others egg-shaped, and others of different shapes; yet they do not have every shape. Nor are they living beings segregated from the infinite.] For no one could prove that in a world of such a kind such seeds from which animals and plants and all the rest of observed things are constituted could not have been included, whereas in a world of such a kind they could have been. [And likewise that they could be nurtured. And in the same way one must consider it regarding the earth.]
“Ἀλλὰ μὴν ὑποληπτέον καὶ τὴν φύσιν πολλὰ καὶ παντοῖα ὑπὸ αὐτῶν τῶν πραγμάτων διδαχθῆναί τε καὶ ἀναγκασθῆναι· τὸν δὲ λογισμὸν τὰ ὑπὸ ταύτης παρεγγυηθέντα ὕστερον ἐπακριβοῦν καὶ προσεξευρίσκειν ἐν μὲν τισὶ θᾶττον, ἐν δὲ τισὶ βραδύτερον καὶ ἐν μὲν τισὶ περιόδοις καὶ χρόνοις 〈μείζους λαμβάνειν ἐπιδόσεισ〉, ἐν δὲ τισὶ καὶ ἐλάττους. “Ὅθεν καὶ τὰ ὀνόματα ἐξ ἀρχῆς μὴ θέσει γενέσθαι, ἀλλʼ αὐτὰς τὰς φύσεις τῶν ἀνθρώπων καθʼ ἕκαστα ἔθνη ἴδια πάσχουσας πάθη καὶ ἰδία λαμβανούσας φαντάσματα ἰδίως τὸν ἀέρα ἐκπέμπειν στελλόμενον ὑφʼ ἑκάστων τῶν παθῶν καὶ τῶν φαντασμάτων, ὡς ἄν ποτε καὶ ἡ παρὰ τοὺς τόπους τῶν ἐθνῶν διαφορὰ ᾖ·
"Indeed, one must also suppose that human nature was taught and compelled to do many diverse things by the facts themselves, and that reason later made precise and further discovered what was handed over by nature, in some things more quickly, in others more slowly, and in some cycles and periods of time 〈making greater advances〉, and in others smaller. "Hence, words too did not arise originally by convention, but the natures of human beings themselves in each nation, experiencing their own peculiar feelings and receiving their own peculiar impressions, emitted air in a peculiar way shaped by each of the feelings and impressions, according to whatever difference there might also be among the locations of the nations;
ὕστερον δὲ κοινῶς καθʼ ἕκαστα ἔθνη τὰ ἴδια τεθῆναι πρὸς τὸ τὰς δηλώσεις ἧττον ἀμφιβόλους γενέσθαι ἀλλήλοις καὶ συντομωτέρως δηλουμένας· τινὰ δὲ καὶ οὐ συνορώμενα πράγματα εἰσφέροντας τοὺς συνειδότας παρεγγυῆσαί τινας φθόγγους ἀναγκασθέντας ἀναφωνῆσαι, τοὺς δὲ τῷ λογισμῷ ἑλομένους κατὰ τὴν πλείστην αἰτίαν οὕτως ἑρμηνεῦσαι1. “Καὶ μὴν ἐν τοῖς μετεώροις φορὰν καὶ τροπὴν καὶ ἔκλειψιν καὶ ἀνατολὴν καὶ δύσιν καὶ τὰ σύστοιχα τούτοις μήτε λειτουργοῦντός τινος νομίζειν δεῖ γενέσθαι καὶ διατάττοντος ἢ διατάξοντος καὶ ἅμα τὴν πάσαν μακαριότητα ἔχοντος μετʼ ἀφθαρσίας
and later, in each nation, expressions were established in common so that designations might become less ambiguous to one another and more concisely conveyed; and those who were aware of certain unobserved things introduced them and transmitted certain sounds, having been compelled to utter them, while others, choosing them by reasoning, interpreted them accordingly based on the most prevalent reason. "Furthermore, with regard to celestial phenomena, one must not believe that motion and solstice, eclipse, rising, setting, and things coordinate with these take place because someone is ministering and arranging or about to arrange them, while simultaneously possessing all blessedness together with incorruptibility
(οὐ γὰρ συμφωνοῦσιν πραγματεῖαι καὶ φροντίδες καὶ ὀργαὶ καὶ χάριτες μακαριότητι, ἀλλʼ ἐν ἀσθενείᾳ καὶ φόβῳ καὶ προσδεήσει τῶν πλησίον ταῦτα γίγνεται), μήτε αὖ πυρὸς ἀνάμματα συνεστραμμένου τὴν μακαριότητα κεκτημένα κατὰ βούλησιν τὰς κινήσεις ταύτας λαμβάνειν· ἀλλὰ πᾶν τὸ σέμνωμα τηρεῖν, κατὰ πάντα ὀνόματα φερόμενον ἐπὶ τὰς τοιαύτας ἐννοίας, ἵνα μηδʼ ὑπεναντίαι ἐξ αὐτῶν 〈γένωνται〉 τῷ σεμνώματι δόξαι· εἰ δὲ μή, τὸν μέγιστον τάραχον ἐν ταῖς ψυχαῖς αὐτὴ ἡ ὑπεναντιότης παρασκευάσει. ὅθεν δὴ κατὰ τὰς ἐξ ἀρχῆς ἐναπολήψεις τῶν συστροφῶν τούτων ἐν τῇ τοῦ κόσμου γενέσει δεῖ δοξάζειν καὶ τὴν ἀνάγκην ταύτην καὶ περίοδον συντελεῖσθαι.
(for business, worries, anger, and gratitude do not harmonize with blessedness, but these arise in weakness, fear, and need of one's neighbors); nor again must one believe that masses of condensed fire, having acquired blessedness, assume these motions according to their own will. Rather, one must preserve all reverence in every expression applied to such conceptions, so that no opinions contrary to that reverence 〈may arise〉 from them; otherwise, this contradiction itself will produce the greatest disturbance in souls. Hence, one must believe that both this necessity and period are fulfilled in accordance with the original inclusions of these conglomerations during the generation of the world.
“Καὶ μὴν καὶ τὸ τὴν ὑπὲρ τῶν κυριωτάτων αἰτίαν ἐξακριβῶσαι φυσιολογίας ἔργον εἶναι δεῖ νομίζειν, καὶ τὸ μακάριον ἐνταῦθα πεπτωκέναι καὶ ἐν τῷ τίνες φύσεις αἱ θεωρούμεναι κατὰ τὰ μετέωρα ταυτί, καὶ ὅσα συντείνει πρὸς τὴν εἰς τοῦτο ἀκρίβειαν. “Ἔτι τε οὐ τὸ πλεοναχῶς ἐν τοῖς τοιούτοις εἶναι καὶ τὸ ἐνδεχόμενον καὶ ἄλλως πως ἔχειν, ἀλλʼ ἁπλῶς μὴ εἶναι ἐν ἀφθάρτῳ καὶ μακαρίᾳ φύσει τῶν διάκρισιν ὑποβαλλόντων ἢ τάραχον μηθέν2· καὶ τοῦτο καταλαβεῖν τῇ διανοίᾳ ἔστιν ἁπλῶς εἶναι.
"Moreover, one must also believe that to investigate precisely the cause concerning the most sovereign things is the task of natural philosophy, and that our blessedness lies in this and in knowing what natures are observed in these celestial phenomena, and in all that contributes to precision regarding this. "Furthermore, [what matters] is not that things in such matters happen in multiple ways and admit of being otherwise, but simply that nothing that suggests conflict or disturbance exists in an incorruptible and blessed nature; and to comprehend this with the mind is simply to be in blessedness.
“Τὸ δʼ ἐν τῇ ἱστορίᾳ πεπτωκός, τῆς δύσεως καὶ ἀνατολῆς καὶ τροπῆς καὶ ἐκλείψεως καὶ ὅσα συγγενῆ τούτοις μηθὲν ἔτι πρὸς τὸ μακάριον τὰς γνώσεις συντείνειν3, ἀλλʼ ὁμοίως τοὺς φόβους ἔχειν τοὺς ταῦτα κατειδότας, τίνες δʼ αἱ φύσεις ἀγνοοῦντας καὶ τίνες αἱ κυριώταται αἰτίαι, καὶ εἰ μὴ προσῄδεισαν ταῦτα· τάχα δὲ καὶ πλείους, ὅταν τὸ θάμβος ἐκ τῆς τούτων προσκατανοήσεως μὴ δύνηται τὴν λύσιν λαμβάνειν καὶ τὴν περὶ τῶν κυριωτάτων οἰκονομίαν. “Διὸ δὴ κἂν πλείους αἰτίας εὑρίσκωμεν τροπῶν καὶ δύσεων καὶ ἀνατολῶν καὶ ἐκλείψεων καὶ τῶν τοιουτοτρόπων, ὥσπερ καὶ ἐν τοῖς κατὰ μέρος γινομένοις ἦν,
"However, that which belongs to astronomical inquiry—concerning setting, rising, solstice, eclipse, and whatever is related to these—no longer contributes at all to blessedness, but those who know these things while remaining ignorant of what the natures are and what the most sovereign causes are possess fears just the same as if they had not known them beforehand; and perhaps even more fears, whenever the astonishment resulting from the additional observation of these phenomena cannot find resolution and a systematic account concerning the most sovereign things. "Wherefore, even if we discover multiple causes for solstices, settings, risings, eclipses, and things of that sort, just as was the case with particular occurrences,
- 10.1.76τινὰ δὲ καὶ οὐ συνορώμενα πράγματα εἰσφέροντας τοὺς συνειδότας παρεγγυῆσαί τινας φθόγγους ἀναγκασθέντας ἀναφωνῆσαι, τοὺς δὲ τῷ λογισμῷ ἑλομένους κατὰ τὴν πλείστην αἰτίαν οὕτως ἑρμηνεῦσαι
In this accusative and infinitive construction, the participle phrase εἰσφέροντας modifies the subject accusative τοὺς συνειδότας, which governs the infinitive παρεγγυῆσαι; ἀναγκασθέντας ἀναφωνῆσαι is an appositional participial phrase explaining their compulsion to utter the sounds. In the second half, τοὺς δὲ functions contrastively as the subject accusative of the infinitive ἑρμηνεῦσαι, designating the broader community who received and interpreted these expressions.
- 10.1.78Ἔτι τε οὐ τὸ πλεοναχῶς ἐν τοῖς τοιούτοις εἶναι καὶ τὸ ἐνδεχόμενον καὶ ἄλλως πως ἔχειν, ἀλλʼ ἁπλῶς μὴ εἶναι ἐν ἀφθάρτῳ καὶ μακαρίᾳ φύσει τῶν διάκρισιν ὑποβαλλόντων ἢ τάραχον μηθέν
The structure rests on the contrast οὐ τὸ ... ἀλλὰ μὴ εἶναι. The subject accusative and infinitive phrases in the first clause (τὸ πλεοναχῶς ... εἶναι and τὸ ἐνδεχόμενον) present the topic of multiple astronomical explanations, contrasting with the fundamental requirement that nothing disruptive belong to the divine nature. The syntax underlines that having multiple natural explanations is not the problem; rather, avoiding the introduction of disturbance into the concept of divine nature is what is essential.
- 10.1.79Τὸ δʼ ἐν τῇ ἱστορίᾳ πεπτωκός, τῆς δύσεως καὶ ἀνατολῆς καὶ τροπῆς καὶ ἐκλείψεως καὶ ὅσα συγγενῆ τούτοις μηθὲν ἔτι πρὸς τὸ μακάριον τὰς γνώσεις συντείνειν
The introductory neuter phrase Τὸ δʼ ἐν τῇ ἱστορίᾳ πεπτωκός ('that which falls under astronomical observation/inquiry') functions as a pendens/proleptic topic phrase introducing the domain under discussion, which is then grammatically explicated by the accusative and infinitive clause μηθὲν ἔτι πρὸς τὸ μακάριον τὰς γνώσεις συντείνειν ('that these pieces of knowledge contribute nothing further to blessedness').
