- Source
- Diogenes Laertius. Hicks, R. D., editor. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann Ltd., 1925.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.8-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:10.1.7-10.1.11
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-09-30
After citing further slanders from Timocrates and others regarding Epicurus' poor health, alleged luxury, and insults against fellow philosophers, the author refutes them by detailing Epicurus' kindness, frugal lifestyle, devoted friendships, and the unbroken endurance of his school.
τόν τε Ἐπίκουρον πολλὰ κατὰ τὸν λόγον ἠγνοηκέναι καὶ πολὺ μᾶλλον κατὰ τὸν βίον, τό τε σῶμα ἐλεεινῶς διακεῖσθαι, ὡς πολλῶν ἐτῶν μὴ δύνασθαι ἀπὸ τοῦ φορείου διαναστῆναι· μνᾶν τε ἀναλίσκειν ἡμερησίαν εἰς τὴν τράπεζαν, ὡς αὐτὸς ἐν τῇ πρὸς Λεόντιον ἐπιστολῇ γράφει καὶ ἐν τῇ πρὸς τοὺς ἐν Μυτιλήνῃ φιλοσόφους. συνεῖναί τε αὐτῷ τε καὶ Μητροδώρῳ ἑταίρας καὶ ἄλλας, Μαμμάριον καὶ Ἡδεῖαν καὶ Ἐρώτιον καὶ Νικίδιον. καὶ ἐν ταῖς ἑπτὰ καὶ τριάκοντα βίβλοις ταῖς Περὶ φύσεως τὰ πλεῖστα ταὐτὰ λέγειν καὶ ἀντιγράφειν ἐν αὐταῖς ἄλλοις τε καὶ Ναυσιφάνει τὰ πλεῖστα καὶ αὐτῇ λέξει φάσκειν οὕτως· Ἀλλʼ ἴτωσαν· εἶχε γὰρ ἐκεῖνος ὠδίνων1 τὴν ἀπὸ τοῦ στόματος καύχησιν τὴν σοφιστικήν, καθάπερ καὶ ἄλλοι πολλοὶ τῶν ἀνδραπόδων.
He further says that Epicurus was ignorant of many things in doctrine and far more so in his way of life; that his body was in a wretched condition, so that for many years he was unable to rise from his litter; and that he spent a mina daily on his table, as he himself writes in his letter to Leontion and in the letter to the philosophers in Mytilene. Moreover, he states that both he and Metrodorus lived with other courtesans, namely Mammarium, Hedeia, Erotion, and Nicidion. And in the thirty-seven books of On Nature he says mostly the same things and in them writes against others, especially Nausiphanes, saying in these very words in most places as follows: "Let them be gone! For that man was continually in travail bringing forth the sophistical boast from his mouth, just like many others among the slaves."
καὶ αὐτὸν Ἐπίκουρον ἐν ταῖς ἐπιστολαῖς περὶ Ναυσιφάνους λέγειν· Ταῦτα ἤγαγεν αὐτὸν εἰς ἔκστασιν τοιαύτην, ὥστε μοι λοιδορεῖσθαι καὶ ἀποκαλεῖν διδάσκαλον. πλεύμονά τε αὐτὸν ἐκάλει καὶ ἀγράμματον καὶ ἀπατεῶνα καὶ πόρνην· τούς τε περὶ Πλάτωνα Διονυσοκόλακας καὶ αὐτὸν Πλάτωνα χρυσοῦν, καὶ Ἀριστοτέλη ἄσωτον, 〈ὃν〉 καταφαγόντα τὴν πατρῴαν οὐσίαν στρατεύεσθαι καὶ φαρμακοπωλεῖν· φορμοφόρον τε Πρωταγόραν καὶ γραφέα Δημοκρίτου καὶ ἐν κώμαις γράμματα διδάσκειν· Ἡράκλειτόν τε κυκητὴν καὶ Δημόκριτον Ληρόκριτον καὶ Ἀντίδωρον Σαννίδωρον· τούς τε Κυνικοὺς ἐχθροὺς τῆς Ἑλλάδος· καὶ τοὺς διαλεκτικοὺς πολυφθόρους, Πύρρωνα δʼ ἀμαθῆ καὶ ἀπαίδευτον.
And he adds that Epicurus himself says in his letters concerning Nausiphanes: "These things drove him into such a frenzy that he abused me and called me 'teacher'." And Epicurus called him a "lung", illiterate, a cheat, and a prostitute. The followers of Plato he called "flatterers of Dionysius" and Plato himself "the golden man"; Aristotle he called "a profligate", who, after devouring his paternal estate, went into the army and sold drugs; Protagoras he called "a porter" and Democritus' copyist, who taught reading and writing in villages; Heraclitus he called "the jumbler"; Democritus, "Lerocritus"; Antidorus, "Sannidorus"; the Cynics, "enemies of Greece"; the dialecticians, "corrupters of many"; and Pyrrho, "ignorant and uneducated."
Μεμήνασι δʼ οὗτοι. τῷ γὰρ ἀνδρὶ μάρτυρες ἱκανοὶ τῆς ἀνυπερβλήτου πρὸς πάντας εὐγνωμοσύνης ἥ τε πατρὶς χαλκαῖς εἰκόσι τιμήσασα οἵ τε φίλοι τοσοῦτοι τὸ πλῆθος ὡς μηδʼ ἂν πόλεσιν ὅλαις μετρεῖσθαι δύνασθαι· οἵ τε γνώριμοι πάντες ταῖς δογματικαῖς αὐτοῦ σειρῆσι προσκατασχεθέντες, πλὴν Μητροδώρου τοῦ Στρατονικέως πρὸς Καρνεάδην ἀποχωρήσαντος, τάχα βαρυνθέντος ταῖς ἀνυπερβλήτοις αὐτοῦ χρηστότησιν· ἥ τε διαδοχή2, πασῶν σχεδὸν ἐκλιπουσῶν τῶν ἄλλων, ἐσαεὶ διαμένουσα καὶ νηρίθμους ἀρχὰς ἀπολύουσα ἄλλην ἐξ ἄλλης τῶν γνωρίμων·
These slanderers are raving mad. For sufficient witnesses to the man's unsurpassed goodwill toward all are his native land, which honored him with bronze statues; his friends, so great in number that they could not even be measured by entire cities; and all his disciples, who were held fast by the sirens of his doctrines—except for Metrodorus of Stratonicea, who went over to Carneades, perhaps weighed down by his unsurpassed kindnesses; and his school succession, which, while almost all the other schools died out, has lasted forever, discharging one leader after another in countless numbers from among his followers.
ἥ τε πρὸς τοὺς γονέας εὐχαριστία καὶ ἡ πρὸς τοὺς ἀδελφοὺς εὐποιία πρός τε τοὺς οἰκέτας ἡμερότης, ὡς δῆλον κἀκ τῶν διαθηκῶν αὐτοῦ καὶ ὅτι αὐτοὶ συνεφιλοσόφουν αὐτῷ, ὧν ἦν ἐνδοξότατος ὁ προειρημένος Μῦς· καθόλου τε ἡ πρὸς πάντας αὐτοῦ φιλανθρωπία. τῆς μὲν γὰρ πρὸς θεοὺς ὁσιότητος καὶ πρὸς πατρίδα φιλίας ἄλεκτος ἡ διάθεσις· ὑπερβολῇ γὰρ ἐπιεικείας οὐδὲ πολιτείας ἥψατο. καὶ χαλεπωτάτων δὲ καιρῶν κατασχόντων τηνικάδε τὴν Ἑλλάδα, αὐτόθι καταβιῶναι, δὶς ἢ τρὶς τοὺς περὶ τὴν Ἰωνίαν τόπους πρὸς τοὺς φίλους διαδραμόντα. οἳ καὶ πανταχόθεν πρὸς αὐτὸν ἀφικνοῦντο καὶ συνεβίουν αὐτῷ ἐν τῷ κήπῳ, καθά φησι καὶ Ἀπολλόδωρος· ὃν καὶ ὀγδοήκοντα μνῶν πρίασθαι3.
Sufficient witnesses, too, are his gratitude toward his parents, his beneficence toward his brothers, and his gentleness toward his domestic slaves, as is clear both from his wills and from the fact that they themselves studied philosophy with him—of whom the most famous was the aforementioned Mys; and in general his philanthropy toward all men. Indeed, his disposition in reverence toward the gods and affection for his native land was beyond words; for out of an excess of modesty he did not even touch politics. And though the hardest times held Greece in their grip back then, he lived out his life there, only making two or three excursions to the regions around Ionia to visit his friends. And they came to him from all quarters and lived together with him in the Garden, as Apollodorus also says; and this Garden he had purchased for eighty minae.
Διοκλῆς δʼ ἐν τῇ τρίτῃ τῆς ἐπιδρομῆς φησιν εὐτελέστατα καὶ λιτότατα διαιτώμενοι. κοτύλῃ γοῦν, φησίν, οἰνιδίου ἠρκοῦντο, τὸ δὲ πᾶν ὕδωρ ἦν αὐτοῖς ποτόν. τόν τʼ Ἐπίκουρον μὴ ἀξιοῦν εἰς τὸ κοινὸν κατατίθεσθαι τὰς οὐσίας, καθάπερ τὸν Πυθαγόραν κοινὰ τὰ φίλων λέγοντα· ἀπιστούντων γὰρ εἶναι τὸ τοιοῦτον4· εἰ δʼ ἀπίστων οὐδὲ φίλων. αὐτός τέ φησιν ἐν ταῖς ἐπιστολαῖς, ὕδατι μόνον ἀρκεῖσθαι καὶ ἄρτῳ λιτῷ. καί, πέμψον μοι τυροῦ, φησί, κυθριδίου, ἵνʼ ὅταν βούλωμαι πολυτελεύσασθαι δύνωμαι. τοιοῦτος ἦν ὁ τὴν ἡδονὴν εἶναι τέλος δογματίζων, ὃν καὶ Ἀθήναιος διʼ ἐπιγράμματος οὕτως ὑμνεῖ·
Diocles, in the third book of his Summary, says that they lived in the cheapest and simplest manner: "At any rate," he says, "they were content with a half-pint of thin wine, and their drink was entirely water." Furthermore, Epicurus did not deem it right to deposit their property into a common fund, as did Pythagoras, who said that the goods of friends are common; for such a practice belongs to those who distrust, and if to those who distrust, then not to friends. Epicurus himself says in his letters that he is satisfied with water alone and simple bread; and he says: "Send me a small pot of cheese, so that whenever I wish to feast sumptuously, I may be able to do so." Such was the man who dogmatized that pleasure is the end, whom Athenaeus also celebrates in an epigram as follows:
- 10.1.7εἶχε γὰρ ἐκεῖνος ὠδίνων
A periphrastic imperfect construction combining the imperfect εἶχε with the present active participle ὠδίνων, expressing continuous or habitual action ("he was continually in travail bringing forth"). The verb ὠδίνω denotes birth pangs, metaphorically used here for laboring to utter empty words.
- 10.1.9τῷ γὰρ ἀνδρὶ μάρτυρες ἱκανοὶ τῆς ἀνυπερβλήτου πρὸς πάντας εὐγνωμοσύνης ἥ τε πατρὶς ... οἵ τε φίλοι ... οἵ τε γνώριμοι ... ἥ τε διαδοχή
The structural backbone consists of the predicate nominal μάρτυρες ἱκανοί followed by four coordinated nominative noun phrases acting as compound subjects: ἥ τε πατρὶς ..., οἵ τε φίλοι ..., οἵ τε γνώριμοι ..., and ἥ τε διαδοχή ... The dative τῷ ἀνδρί is a dative of reference/advantage, while the genitive τῆς εὐγνωμοσύνης is an objective genitive dependent on μάρτυρες.
- 10.1.10ὃν καὶ ὀγδοήκοντα μνῶν πρίασθαι
The relative pronoun ὃν takes the immediately preceding τὸν κῆπον ('the garden') as its antecedent and functions as the direct object of the infinitive πρίασθαι in indirect discourse (with Epicurus as the implied subject accusative). The genitive ὀγδοήκοντα μνῶν is a genitive of price.
- 10.1.11ἀπιστούντων γὰρ εἶναι τὸ τοιοῦτον
The genitive of the participle ἀπιστούντων is a predicate genitive of characteristic/possession with εἶναι, denoting that 'such a practice (τὸ τοιοῦτον) is characteristic of / belongs to those who distrust one another.'
