← Diogenes Laertius

Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers

§10.1.30-10.1.34

Division of Philosophy and the Canonic Criteria of Truth

The tripartite division of Epicurean philosophy (Canonic, Physical, Ethical) and its corresponding treatises are outlined, followed by the rejection of dialectic and a detailed epistemological account of the criteria of truth (sensations, preconceptions, and feelings).

← PrevNext →

τὸ μὲν οὖν κανονικὸν ἐφόδους ἐπὶ τὴν πραγματείαν ἔχει, καὶ ἔστιν ἐν ἑνὶ τῷ ἐπιγραφομένῳ Κανών· τὸ δὲ φυσικὸν τὴν περὶ φύσεως θεωρίαν πᾶσαν, καὶ ἔστιν ἐν ταῖς Περὶ φύσεως βίβλοις ἑπτὰ καὶ τριάκοντα καὶ ταῖς ἐπιστολαῖς κατὰ στοιχεῖον· τὸ δὲ ἠθικὸν τὰ περὶ αἱρέσεως καὶ φυγῆς· ἔστι δὲ καὶ ἐν ταῖς Περὶ βίων βίβλοις καὶ ἐπιστολαῖς καὶ τῷ Περὶ τέλους. εἰώθασι μέντοι τὸ κανονικὸν ὁμοῦ τῷ φυσικῷ τάττειν· καλοῦσι δʼ αὐτὸ περὶ κριτηρίου καὶ ἀρχῆς, καὶ στοιχειωτικόν· τὸ δὲ φυσικὸν περὶ γενέσεως καὶ φθορᾶς, καὶ περὶ φύσεως· τὸ δὲ ἠθικὸν περὶ αἱρετῶν καὶ φευκτῶν καὶ περὶ βίων καὶ τέλους.

​Now, the Canonic part contains introductions to the whole study, and is contained in the single work entitled The Canon. The Physical part contains the entire theory of nature, and is contained in the thirty-seven books On Nature and in the elementary letters. The Ethical part contains the matters concerning choice and avoidance; and it is contained in the books On Ways of Life, in the letters, and in On the Chief End. However, they are accustomed to group the Canonic together with the Physical; and they call the former "On the Criterion and First Principle" and "Elementary Exposition"; and the Physical "On Generation and Corruption" and "On Nature"; and the Ethical "On Things to Be Chosen and Avoided" and "On Ways of Life and the Chief End."

Τὴν διαλεκτικὴν ὡς παρέλκουσαν ἀποδοκιμάζουσιν· ἀρκεῖν γὰρ τοὺς φυσικοὺς χωρεῖν κατὰ τοὺς τῶν πραγμάτων φθόγγους1. ἐν τοίνυν τῷ Κανόνι λέγων ἐστὶν ὁ Ἐπίκουρος κριτήρια τῆς ἀληθείας εἶναι τὰς αἰσθήσεις καὶ προλήψεις καὶ τὰ πάθη, οἱ δʼ Ἐπικούρειοι καὶ τὰς φανταστικὰς ἐπιβολὰς τῆς διανοίας. λέγει δὲ καὶ ἐν τῇ πρὸς Ἡρόδοτον ἐπιτομῇ καὶ ἐν ταῖς Κυρίαις δόξαις. πᾶσα γάρ, φησίν, αἴσθησις ἄλογός ἐστι καὶ μνήμης οὐδεμιᾶς δεκτική· οὔτε γὰρ ὑφʼ αὑτῆς οὔτε ὑφʼ ἑτέρου κινηθεῖσα δύναταί τι προσθεῖναι ἢ ἀφελεῖν· οὐδὲ ἔστι τὸ δυνάμενον αὐτὰς διελέγξαι.

​Dialectic they reject as superfluous; for they say it is sufficient for natural philosophers to proceed according to the proper terms of things. Now, in The Canon Epicurus states that the criteria of truth are the sensations, the preconceptions (prolepseis), and the feelings; and the Epicureans add also the intuitive graspings of the intellect. He says this also in the Epitome to Herodotus and in the Principal Doctrines. "For every sensation," he says, "is irrational and incapable of receiving any memory; for neither being moved by itself nor by something else can it add or subtract anything; nor is there anything capable of refuting sensations.

οὔτε γὰρ ἡ ὁμογένεια αἴσθησις τὴν ὁμογενῆ διὰ τὴν ἰσοσθένειαν, οὔθʼ ἡ ἀνομογένεια τὴν ἀνομογένειαν, οὐ γὰρ τῶν αὐτῶν εἰσι κριτικαί· οὔτε μὴν λόγος, πᾶς γὰρ λόγος ἀπὸ τῶν αἰσθήσεων ἤρτηται. οὔθʼ ἡ ἑτέρα τὴν ἑτέραν, πάσαις γὰρ προσέχομεν. καὶ τὸ τὰ ἐπαισθήματα δʼ ὑφεστάναι πιστοῦται τὴν τῶν αἰσθήσεων ἀλήθειαν2. ὑφέστηκε δὲ τό τε ὁρᾶν ἡμᾶς καὶ ἀκούειν, ὥσπερ τὸ ἀλγεῖν· ὅθεν καὶ περὶ τῶν ἀδήλων ἀπὸ τῶν φαινομένων χρὴ σημειοῦσθαι. καὶ γὰρ καὶ ἐπίνοιαι πᾶσαι ἀπὸ τῶν αἰσθήσεων γεγόνασι κατά τε περίπτωσιν καὶ ἀναλογίαν καὶ ὁμοιότητα καὶ σύνθεσιν, συμβαλλομένου τι καὶ τοῦ λογισμοῦ. τά τε τῶν μαινομένων φαντάσματα καὶ 〈τὰ〉 κατʼ ὄναρ ἀληθῆ, κινεῖ γάρ· τὸ δὲ μὴ ὂν οὐ κινεῖ.

​For neither can a homogeneous sensation refute a homogeneous one on account of their equal strength, nor an inhomogeneous one an inhomogeneous one, for they are not judges of the same objects; nor indeed can reason, for all reason is dependent upon the sensations; nor can one sensation refute another, for we attend to all of them. Moreover, the fact that perceptions subsist confirms the truth of the sensations. And our seeing and hearing subsist just as much as feeling pain; whence it is necessary to make inferences concerning unseen things from phenomena. For indeed all conceptions have arisen from sensations by coincidence, analogy, similarity, and combination, reasoning also contributing something. And the mental impressions of madmen and those in dreams are true, for they produce movement; and that which does not exist does not produce movement."

Τὴν δὲ πρόληψιν λέγουσιν οἱονεὶ κατάληψιν ἢ δόξαν ὀρθὴν ἢ ἔννοιαν ἢ καθολικὴν νόησιν ἐναποκειμένην, τουτέστι μνήμην τοῦ πολλάκις ἔξωθεν φανέντος, οἷον τὸ Τοιοῦτόν ἐστιν ἄνθρωπος· ἅμα γὰρ τῷ ῥηθῆναι ἄνθρωπος εὐθὺς κατὰ πρόληψιν καὶ ὁ τύπος αὐτοῦ νοεῖται προηγουμένων τῶν αἰσθήσεων. παντὶ οὖν ὀνόματι τὸ πρώτως ὑποτεταγμένον ἐναργές ἐστι· καὶ οὐκ ἂν ἐζητήσαμεν τὸ ζητούμενον, εἰ μὴ πρότερον ἐγνώκειμεν αὐτό· οἷον Τὸ πόρρω ἑστὼς ἵππος ἐστὶν ἢ βοῦς· δεῖ γὰρ κατὰ πρόληψιν ἐγνωκέναι ποτὲ ἵππου καὶ βοὸς μορφήν· οὐδʼ ἂν ὠνομάσαμέν τι μὴ πρότερον αὐτοῦ κατὰ πρόληψιν τὸν τύπον μαθόντες. ἐναργεῖς οὖν εἰσιν αἱ προλήψεις· καὶ τὸ δοξαστὸν ἀπὸ προτέρου τινὸς ἐναργοῦς ἤρτηται, ἐφʼ ὃ ἀναφέροντες λέγομεν, οἷον Πόθεν ἴσμεν εἰ τοῦτό ἐστιν ἄνθρωπος;

​By preconception (prolepsis) they mean a kind of comprehension, or correct opinion, or concept, or stored universal notion—that is, a memory of what has frequently appeared from without, such as: "A human being is of such a sort." For as soon as "human being" is uttered, immediately by preconception its outline is also conceived, the sensations having led the way. Therefore, with respect to every name, that which is primarily subordinated to it is self-evident; and we would not have sought what is being sought if we had not known it beforehand; as, for instance: "Is that which stands far off a horse or an ox?" For one must have known beforehand by preconception the form of a horse and an ox; nor would we have named anything if we had not previously learned its outline by preconception. Preconceptions, therefore, are self-evident; and that which is an object of opinion depends upon something self-evident that preceded it, referring back to which we say, for instance: "Whence do we know if this is a human being?"

τὴν δὲ δόξαν καὶ ὑπόληψιν λέγουσιν, ἀληθῆ τέ φασι καὶ ψευδῆ· ἂν μὲν γὰρ ἐπιμαρτυρῆται ἢ μὴ ἀντιμαρτυρῆται, ἀληθῆ εἶναι· ἐὰν δὲ μὴ ἐπιμαρτυρῆται ἢ ἀντιμαρτυρῆται, ψευδῆ τυγχάνειν. ὅθεν 〈τὸ〉 προσμένον εἰσήχθη3· οἷον τὸ προσμεῖναι καὶ ἐγγὺς γενέσθαι τῷ πύργῳ καὶ μαθεῖν ὁποῖος ἐγγὺς φαίνεται. Πάθη δὲ λέγουσιν εἶναι δύο, ἡδονὴν καὶ ἀλγηδόνα, ἱστάμενα περὶ πᾶν ζῷον, καὶ τὴν μὲν οἰκεῖον, τὴν δὲ ἀλλότριον· διʼ ὧν κρίνεσθαι τὰς αἱρέσεις καὶ φυγάς. τῶν τε ζητήσεων εἶναι τὰς μὲν περὶ τῶν πραγμάτων, τὰς δὲ περὶ ψιλὴν τὴν φωνήν. καὶ ταῦτα δὲ περὶ τῆς διαιρέσεως καὶ τοῦ κριτηρίου στοιχειωδῶς. Ἀνιτέον δὲ ἐπὶ τὴν ἐπιστολήν. “Ἐπίκουρος Ἡροδότῳ χαίρειν.

​Opinion (doxa) they also call supposition (hypolepsis), and they say it is both true and false: for if it is attested to or not attested against, it is true; but if it is not attested to or is attested against, it turns out to be false. Whence the notion of "awaiting" was introduced; such as awaiting and getting near the tower and learning what sort of thing it appears when close up. They say feelings (pathe) are two, pleasure and pain, which subsist in every living being, the one being congenial, the other alien; through which choices and avoidances are judged. And of investigations, some concern things, while others concern mere words. Let this suffice, then, concerning the division and the criterion in an elementary way. We must now turn to the letter. "Epicurus to Herodotus, greetings.

Syntax notes3 items
  1. 10.1.31ἀρκεῖν γὰρ τοὺς φυσικοὺς χωρεῖν κατὰ τοὺς τῶν πραγμάτων φθόγγους

    Accusative and infinitive construction in indirect speech. The infinitive ἀρκεῖν depends on the governing thought/speech, with the subsequent infinitive phrase χωρεῖν κατὰ... functioning as subject and τοὺς φυσικούς as its accusative subject: 'it is sufficient that the natural philosophers proceed according to the natural utterances of things.'

  2. 10.1.32καὶ τὸ τὰ ἐπαισθήματα δʼ ὑφεστάναι πιστοῦται τὴν τῶν αἰσθήσεων ἀλήθειαν

    The articular infinitive clause τὸ... ὑφεστάναι ('the fact that... subsist') serves as the grammatical subject of the transitive verb πιστοῦται ('confirms / guarantees'), with τὰ ἐπαισθήματα as the accusative subject of the infinitive, and τὴν τῶν αἰσθήσεων ἀλήθειαν as direct object.

  3. 10.1.34ὅθεν 〈τὸ〉 προσμένον εἰσήχθη

    〈τὸ〉 προσμένον is the substantivized neuter present participle of προσμένω ('to wait, await'), designating the Epicurean epistemological technical term 'awaiting' (awaiting closer inspection/confirmation before forming a firm judgment).

Model: gemini-3.8-flashurn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:10.1.30-10.1.34