← Diogenes Laertius

Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers

§10.1.35-10.1.40

Letter to Herodotus and First Principles of Physics

Epicurus explains to Herodotus his purpose in composing a summary to keep essential physical doctrines readily in memory, lays down the epistemological requirement of relying on the primary meaning of words and direct perceptions, and presents the first principles of physics: nothing comes from or perishes into nothing, the universe is eternal, and reality consists solely of bodies and void.

← PrevNext →

“Τοῖς μὴ δυναμένοις, ὦ Ἡρόδοτε, ἕκαστα τῶν περὶ φύσεως ἀναγεγραμμένων ἡμῖν ἐξακριβοῦν μηδὲ τὰς μείζους τῶν συντεταγμένων βίβλους διαθρεῖν ἐπιτομὴν τῆς ὅλης πραγματείας εἰς τὸ κατασχεῖν τῶν ὁλοσχερωτάτων γε δοξῶν τὴν μνήμην ἱκανῶς αὐτὸς παρεσκεύασα1, ἵνα παρʼ ἑκάστους τῶν καιρῶν ἐν τοῖς κυριωτάτοις βοηθεῖν αὑτοῖς δύνωνται, καθʼ ὅσον ἂν ἐφάπτωνται τῆς περὶ φύσεως θεωρίας. καὶ τοὺς προβεβηκότας δὲ ἱκανῶς ἐν τῇ τῶν ὅλων ἐπιβλέψει τὸν τύπον τῆς ὅλης πραγματείας τὸν κατεστοιχειωμένον δεῖ μνημονεύειν· τῆς γὰρ ἀθρόας ἐπιβολῆς πυκνὸν δεόμεθα, τῆς δὲ κατὰ μέρος οὐχ ὁμοίως.

"For those who are unable, Herodotus, to examine thoroughly each detail of what we have written concerning nature, nor to study through the larger treatises composed by us, I have myself prepared an epitome of the whole system, so that they may sufficiently retain in memory the most general doctrines, in order that on each occasion they may be able to help themselves in the most principal matters, to the extent that they apply themselves to the study of nature. And those too who have made sufficient progress in the survey of the whole must remember the elementary outline of the entire system; for we have frequent need of the comprehensive grasp, but not similarly of the detailed one.

“Βαδιστέον μὲν οὖν καὶ ἐπʼ ἐκεῖνα συνεχῶς, ἐν 〈δὲ〉 τῇ μνήμῃ τὸ τοσοῦτο ποιητέον, ἀφʼ οὗ ἥ τε κυριωτάτη ἐπιβολὴ ἐπὶ τὰ πράγματα ἔσται καὶ δὴ καὶ τὸ κατὰ μέρος ἀκρίβωμα πᾶν ἐξευρήσεται, τῶν ὁλοσχερωτάτων τύπων εὖ περιειλημμένων καὶ μνημονευομένων· ἐπεὶ καὶ τῷ τετελεσιουργημένῳ τοῦτο κυριώτατον τοῦ παντὸς ἀκριβώματος γίνεται, τὸ ταῖς ἐπιβολαῖς ὀξέως δύνασθαι χρῆσθαι, ἑκάστων πρὸς ἁπλᾶ στοιχειώματα καὶ φωνὰς συν-αγομένων. οὐ γὰρ οἷόν τε τὸ πύκνωμα τῆς συνεχοῦς τῶν ὅλων περιοδείας εἰδέναι μὴ δυνάμενον διὰ βραχεῶν φωνῶν ἅπαν ἐμπεριλαβεῖν ἐν αὑτῷ τὸ καὶ κατὰ μέρος ἂν ἐξακριβωθέν.

"One must, then, continually proceed to those detailed matters as well, but in memory one must retain just so much as will afford the most principal grasp of things, and indeed through which all the detailed accuracy will be discovered, once the most general outlines are well apprehended and remembered; since even for the fully accomplished thinker this becomes the most principal part of all exact knowledge: to be able to make swift use of intuitive grasps, with each matter being brought back to simple elementary principles and terms. For it is impossible to know the compact fabric of the continuous survey of the whole if one is unable to comprehend within oneself, through brief utterances, everything that could also be thoroughly examined in detail.

“Ὅθεν δὴ πᾶσι χρησίμης οὔσης τοῖς ᾠκειωμένοις φυσιολογίᾳ τῆς τοιαύτης ὁδοῦ, παρεγγυῶν τὸ συνεχὲς ἐνέργημα ἐν φυσιολογίᾳ καὶ τοιούτῳ μάλιστα ἐγγαληνίζων τῷ βίῳ ἐποίησά σοι καὶ τοιαύτην τινὰ ἐπιτομὴν καὶ στοιχείωσιν τῶν ὅλων δοξῶν. “Πρῶτον μὲν οὖν τὰ ὑποτεταγμένα τοῖς φθόγγοις, ὦ Ἡρόδοτε, δεῖ εἰληφέναι, ὅπως ἂν τὰ δοξαζόμενα ἢ ζητούμενα ἢ ἀπορούμενα ἔχωμεν εἰς ταῦτα ἀνάγοντες ἐπικρίνειν, καὶ μὴ ἄκριτα πάντα ἡμῖν 〈ἴῃ〉 εἰς ἄπειρον ἀποδεικνύουσιν2 ἢ κενοὺς φθόγγους ἔχωμεν.

"Whence, since such a path is useful to all who are familiar with natural science—recommending continuous activity in natural science, and finding peace of mind especially in such a life—I have composed for you as well such an epitome and elementary exposition of the whole of the doctrines. "First of all, then, Herodotus, one must grasp the things subordinated to utterances, in order that we may have that to which we can refer our opinions, inquiries, or difficulties and thereby judge them, and that everything may not go on unjudged for us who demonstrate to infinity, or that we may not hold empty utterances.

ἀνάγκη γὰρ τὸ πρῶτον ἐννόημα καθʼ ἕκαστον φθόγγον βλέπεσθαι καὶ μηθὲν ἀποδείξεως προσδεῖσθαι, εἴπερ ἕξομεν τὸ ζητούμενον ἢ ἀπορούμενον καὶ δοξαζόμενον ἐφʼ ὃ ἀνάξομεν. “Ἔτι τε τὰς αἰσθήσεις δεῖ πάντως τηρεῖν καὶ ἁπλῶς τὰς παρούσας ἐπιβολὰς εἴτε διανοίας εἴθʼ ὅτου δήποτε τῶν κριτηρίων, ὁμοίως δὲ καὶ τὰ ὑπάρχοντα παθη, ὅπως ἂν καὶ τὸ προσμένον καὶ τὸ ἄδηλον ἔχωμεν οἷς σημειωσόμεθα. “Ταῦτα δεῖ διαλαβόντας συνορᾶν ἤδη περὶ τῶν ἀδήλων· πρῶτον μὲν ὅτι οὐδὲν γίνεται ἐκ τοῦ μὴ ὄντος. πᾶν γὰρ ἐκ παντὸς ἐγίνετʼ ἂν σπερμάτων γε οὐθὲν προσδεόμενον.

​For it is necessary that the primary concept corresponding to each utterance be seen and need no demonstration, if we are to have that to which we will refer the thing sought, doubted, or opined. Furthermore, one must keep watch over all sensations, and simply the immediate grasps whether of the intellect or of any of the criteria whatsoever, and likewise the existing feelings, in order that we may have that by which we can infer both what awaits confirmation and what is non-evident. "Having distinguished these points, we must now view comprehensively what concerns non-evident matters. First, that nothing comes into being from what does not exist. For everything would come into being from everything, standing in need of no seeds whatsoever.

καὶ εἰ ἐφθείρετο δὲ τὸ ἀφανιζόμενον εἰς τὸ μὴ ὄν, πάντα ἂν ἀπωλώλει τὰ πράγματα, οὐκ ὄντων εἰς ἃ διελύετο. καὶ μὴν καὶ τὸ πᾶν ἀεὶ τοιοῦτον ἦν οἷον νῦν ἐστι, καὶ ἀεὶ τοιοῦτον ἔσται. οὐθὲν γάρ ἐστιν εἰς ὃ μεταβαλεῖ. παρὰ γὰρ τὸ πᾶν οὐθέν ἐστιν, ὃ ἂν εἰσελθὸν εἰς αὐτὸ τὴν μεταβολὴν ποιήσαιτο. “Ἀλλὰ μὴν καὶ [τοῦτο καὶ ἐν τῇ Μεγάλῃ ἐπιτομῇ φησι κατʼ ἀρχὴν καὶ ἐν τῇ ά Περὶ φύσεως] τὸ πᾶν ἐστι σώματα καὶ κενόν· σώματα μὲν γὰρ ὡς ἔστιν, αὐτὴ ἡ αἴσθησις ἐπὶ πάντων μαρτυρεῖ, καθʼ ἣν ἀναγκαῖον τὸ ἄδηλον τῷ λογισμῷ τεκμαίρεσθαι·

​And if that which disappears were destroyed into non-existence, all things would have perished, since there would be nothing into which they dissolved. Furthermore, the universe was always such as it now is, and always will be such. For there is nothing into which it will change; for besides the universe there is nothing which, entering into it, could produce the change. "Moreover—〔this he also states at the beginning of the Large Epitome and in Book 1 of On Nature〕—the universe consists of bodies and void. For that bodies exist, sensation itself testifies in all cases, according to which it is necessary to make inference with reasoning concerning the non-evident;

εἰ δὲ μὴ ἦν ὃ κενὸν καὶ χώραν καὶ ἀναφῆ φύσιν ὀνομάζομεν, οὐκ ἂν εἶχε τὰ σώματα ὅπου ἦν οὐδὲ διʼ οὗ ἐκινεῖτο, καθάπερ φαίνεται κινούμενα. παρὰ δὲ ταῦτα οὐθὲν οὐδʼ ἐπινοηθῆναι δύναται οὔτε περιληπτῶς οὔτε ἀναλόγως τοῖς περιληπτοῖς ὡς καθʼ ὅλας φύσεις λαμβανόμενα καὶ μὴ ὡς τὰ τούτων συμπτώματα ἢ συμβεβηκότα λεγόμενα3. “Καὶ μὴν καὶ τῶν [τοῦτο καὶ ἐν τῇ πρώτῃ Περὶ φύσεως καὶ τῇ ιδʼ καὶ ιεʼ καὶ τῇ Μεγάλῃ ἐπιτομῇ] σωμάτων τὰ μέν ἐστι συγκρίσεις, τὰ δʼ ἐξ ὧν αἱ συγκρίσεις πεποίηνται·

​and if there were not that which we call void, space, and intangible nature, bodies would not have where to be, nor through what to move, just as they are seen to move. But beyond these nothing can even be conceived, either comprehensively or by analogy with things comprehensively grasped, being taken as complete natures and not being spoken of as accidents or properties of these. "Moreover, of bodies—〔this too is in the first book of On Nature, and in the fourteenth and fifteenth, and in the Large Epitome〕—some are compounds, and others are those from which the compounds have been made.

Syntax notes3 items
  1. 10.1.35Τοῖς μὴ δυναμένοις... αὐτὸς παρεσκεύασα

    The dative phrase at the beginning, "Τοῖς μὴ δυναμένοις...", functions as a dative of interest/advantage dependent on the main verb "παρεσκεύασα" (with emphatic subject "αὐτός"). It has been fronted for topicalization, with the core structure being "I myself prepared an epitome for those who cannot...".

  2. 10.1.37καὶ μὴ ἄκριτα πάντα ἡμῖν 〈ἴῃ〉 εἰς ἄπειρον ἀποδεικνύουσιν

    With the supplemented verb "〈ἴῃ〉", "ἡμῖν ... ἀποδεικνύουσιν" forms a dative of reference/interest with an agreeing participle: "for us, as we demonstrate to infinity, all things would proceed unjudged".

  3. 10.1.40ὡς καθʼ ὅλας φύσεις λαμβανόμενα καὶ μὴ ὡς τὰ τούτων συμπτώματα ἢ συμβεβηκότα λεγόμενα

    The neuter plural participles "λαμβανόμενα" and "λεγόμενα" construct a loose semantic agreement with the singular subject "οὐθέν", referring broadly and collectively to whatever things might be conceived besides bodies and void: "being understood as self-subsistent whole natures and not spoken of as their accidents or properties".

Model: gemini-3.8-flashurn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:10.1.35-10.1.40