← Diogenes Laertius

Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers

§10.1.143-10.1.148

Principal Doctrines 12–28: Natural Science and Limits of Pleasure

In Principal Doctrines 12 through 28, Epicurus establishes that the study of nature and trust in sensory criteria are indispensable for mental tranquility, while defining the natural limits of pleasure, desires, and wealth, and highlighting the supreme role of reason and friendship in achieving a blessed life.

← PrevNext →

[XII.] Οὐκ ἦν τὸ φοβούμενον λύειν ὑπὲρ τῶν κυριωτάτων μὴ κατειδότα τίς ἡ τοῦ σύμπαντος φύσις, ἀλλʼ ὑποπτευόμενόν τι1 τῶν κατὰ τοὺς μύθους· ὥστε οὐκ ἦν ἄνευ φυσιολογίας ἀκεραίους τὰς ἡδονὰς ἀπολαμβάνειν. [XIII.] Οὐθὲν ὄφελος ἦν τὴν κατʼ ἀνθρώπους ἀσφάλειαν κατασκευάζεσθαι τῶν ἄνωθεν ὑπόπτων καθεστώτων καὶ τῶν ὑπὸ γῆς καὶ ἁπλῶς τῶν ἐν τῷ ἀπείρῳ. [XIV.] Τῆς ἀσφαλείας τῆς ἐξ ἀνθρώπων γενομένης μέχρι τινὸς δυνάμει τε ἐξερειστικὴ καὶ εὐπορίᾳ εἰλικρινεστάτη γίνεται ἡ ἐκ τῆς ἡσυχίας καὶ ἐκχωρήσεως τῶν πολλῶν ἀσφάλεια.

[XII.] It was not possible to dissolve the fear concerning the most sovereign matters for someone who did not thoroughly know what the nature of the universe is, but suspected something of the matters according to the myths; so that it was not possible without natural philosophy to obtain pure pleasures. [XIII.] There was no benefit in securing safety from men while the things above remained objects of suspicion, as well as the things beneath the earth and simply those in the infinite. [XIV.] Even if safety from men has been achieved up to a certain point, the safety that arises from quietude and withdrawal from the multitude becomes the purest, in power of resistance and abundance of resources.

[XV.] Ὁ τῆς φύσεως πλοῦτος καὶ ὥρισται καὶ εὐπόριστός ἐστιν· ὁ δὲ τῶν κενῶν δοξῶν εἰς ἄπειρον ἐκπίπτει. [XVI.] Βραχέα σοφῷ τύχη παρεμπίπτει, τὰ δὲ μέγιστα καὶ κυριώτατα ὁ λογισμὸς διῴκηκε καὶ κατὰ τὸν συνεχῆ χρόνον τοῦ βίου διοικεῖ καὶ διοικήσει. [XVII.] Ὁ δίκαιος ἀταρακτότατος, ὁ δʼ ἄδικος πλείστης ταραχῆς γέμων. [XVIII.] Οὐκ ἐπαύξεται ἐν τῇ σαρκὶ ἡ ἡδονή, ἐπειδὰν ἅπαξ τὸ κατʼ ἔνδειαν ἀλγοῦν ἐξαιρεθῇ, ἀλλὰ μόνον ποικίλλεται. τῆς δὲ διανοίας τὸ πέρας τὸ κατὰ τὴν ἡδονὴν ἀπεγέννησεν ἥ τε τούτων αὐτῶν ἐκλόγησις2 καὶ τῶν ὁμογενῶν τούτοις, ὅσα τοὺς μεγίστους φόβους παρεσκεύαζε τῇ διανοίᾳ.

[XV.] The wealth of nature is both limited and easily procured; but that of empty opinions falls away into infinity. [XVI.] Chance falls across the wise man in small matters, but the greatest and most sovereign matters reason has managed, and throughout the continuous time of life manages and will manage. [XVII.] The just man is the least disturbed, but the unjust man is full of the greatest disturbance. [XVIII.] Pleasure does not increase in the flesh once the pain from want is removed, but is only varied. But the limit of the mind in respect of pleasure was generated by the rational calculation of these very things and of those akin to them, as many as used to produce the greatest fears in the mind.

[XIX.] Ὁ ἄπειρος χρόνος ἴσην ἔχει τὴν ἡδονὴν καὶ ὁ πεπερασμένος, ἐάν τις αὐτῆς τὰ πέρατα καταμετρήσῃ τῷ λογισμῷ. [XX.] Ἡ μὲν σὰρξ ἀπέλαβε τὰ πέρατα τῆς ἡδονῆς ἄπειρα, καὶ ἄπειρος αὐτὴν χρόνος παρεσκεύασεν. ἡ δὲ διάνοια τοῦ τῆς σαρκὸς τέλους καὶ πέρατος λαβοῦσα τὸν ἐπιλογισμὸν καὶ τοὺς ὑπὲρ τοῦ αἰῶνος φόβους ἐκλύσασα τὸν παντελῆ βίον παρεσκεύασεν, καὶ οὐθὲν ἔτι τοῦ ἀπείρου χρόνου προσεδεήθη· 〈οὐ〉 μὴν ἀλλʼ οὔτε ἔφυγε τὴν ἡδονήν, οὐθʼ ἡνίκα τὴν ἐξαγωγὴν ἐκ τοῦ ζῆν τὰ πράγματα παρεσκεύαζεν, ὡς ἐλλείπουσά τι τοῦ ἀρίστου βίου κατέστρεφεν.

[XIX.] Infinite time contains an equal pleasure to finite time, if one measures its limits by reason. [XX.] The flesh received the limits of pleasure as infinite, and infinite time provided it. But the mind, having acquired the reflection concerning the end and limit of the flesh and having dissolved the fears concerning eternity, procured the complete life, and had no further need of infinite time; nor indeed did it avoid pleasure, nor, when circumstances prepared the exit from living, did it end as though lacking anything of the best life.

[XXI.] Ὁ τὰ πέρατα τοῦ βίου κατειδὼς οἶδεν, ὡς εὐπόριστόν ἐστι τὸ 〈τὸ〉 ἀλγοῦν κατʼ ἔνδειαν ἐξαιροῦν καὶ τὸ τὸν ὅλον βίον παντελῆ καθιστάν· ὥστʼ οὐδὲν προσδεῖται πραγμάτων ἀγῶνας κεκτημένων. [XXII.] Τὸ ὑφεστηκὸς δεῖ τέλος ἐπιλογίζεσθαι καὶ πᾶσαν τὴν ἐνάργειαν, ἐφʼ ἣν τὰ δοξαζόμενα ἀνάγομεν· εἰ δὲ μή, πάντα ἀκρισίας καὶ ταραχῆς ἔσται μεστά. [XXIII.] Εἰ μάχῃ πάσαις ταῖς αἰσθήσεσιν, οὐχ ἕξεις οὐδʼ ἃς ἂν φῇς αὐτῶν διεψεῦσθαι πρὸς τί ποιούμενος τὴν ἀναγωγὴν κρίνῃς3.

[XXI.] He who thoroughly knows the limits of life knows how easily procured is that which removes the pain from want and renders the whole of life complete; so that he has no further need of things that involve struggles. [XXII.] One must reflect upon the underlying end and all the evident perception to which we refer our opinions; otherwise, everything will be full of indecision and disturbance. [XXIII.] If you fight against all sensations, you will not even have that to which you refer when judging whichever of them you claim to have been deceived.

[XXIV.] Εἴ τινʼ ἐκβαλεῖς ἁπλῶς αἴσθησιν καὶ μὴ διαιρήσεις τὸ δοξαζόμενον κατὰ τὸ προσμένον καὶ τὸ παρὸν ἤδη κατὰ τὴν αἴσθησιν καὶ τὰ πάθη καὶ πᾶσαν φανταστικὴν ἐπιβολὴν τῆς διανοίας, συνταράξεις καὶ τὰς λοιπὰς αἰσθήσεις τῇ ματαίῳ δόξῃ, ὥστε τὸ κριτήριον ἅπαν ἐκβαλεῖς. εἰ δὲ βεβαιώσεις καὶ τὸ προσμένον ἅπαν ἐν ταῖς δοξαστικαῖς ἐννοίαις καὶ τὸ μὴ τὴν ἐπιμαρτύρησιν4, οὐκ ἐκλείψεις τὸ διεψευσμένον· ὡς τετηρηκὼς ἔσῃ πᾶσαν ἀμφισβήτησιν κατὰ πᾶσαν κρίσιν τοῦ ὀρθῶς ἢ μὴ ὀρθῶς.

[XXIV.] If you reject any sensation outright and do not distinguish what is opined in accordance with what awaits confirmation and what is already present in sensation, in the passions, and in every apprehending impression of the mind, you will confuse the remaining sensations with empty opinion, so that you will reject every criterion. And if you affirm in your opinionative thoughts everything that awaits confirmation and that which lacks witnessing confirmation, you will not escape error; for you will have retained every doubt in every judgment of what is correct or not correct.

[XXV.] Εἰ μὴ παρὰ πάντα καιρὸν ἐπανοίσεις ἕκαστον τῶν πραττομένων ἐπὶ τὸ τέλος τῆς φύσεως, ἀλλὰ προκαταστρέψεις εἴ τε φυγὴν εἴ τε δίωξιν ποιούμενος εἰς ἄλλο τι, οὐκ ἔσονταί σοι τοῖς λόγοις αἱ πράξεις ἀκόλουθοι. [XXVI.] Τῶν ἐπιθυμιῶν ὅσαι μὴ ἐπʼ ἀλγοῦν ἐπανάγουσιν ἐὰν μὴ συμπληρωθῶσιν, οὐκ εἰσὶν ἀναγκαῖαι ἀλλʼ εὐδιάχυτον τὴν ὄρεξιν ἔχουσιν, ὅταν δυσπόριστοι ἢ βλάβης ἀπεργαστικαὶ δόξωσιν εἶναι. [XXVII.] Ὧν ἡ σοφία παρασκευάζεται εἰς τὴν τοῦ ὅλου βίου μακαριότητα, πολὺ μέγιστόν ἐστιν ἡ τῆς φιλίας κτῆσις. [XXVIII.] Ἡ αὐτὴ γνώμη θαρρεῖν τε ἐποίησεν ὑπὲρ τοῦ μηθὲν αἰώνιον εἶναι δεινὸν μηδὲ πολυχρόνιον, καὶ τὴν ἐν αὐτοῖς τοῖς ὡρισμένοις ἀσφάλειαν φιλίαις μάλιστα κατεῖδε συντελουμένην.

[XXV.] If you do not on every occasion refer each of your actions to the end of nature, but turn aside beforehand in making either avoidance or pursuit toward something else, your actions will not be consistent with your words. [XXVI.] Among desires, whichever do not lead to pain if they are not fulfilled are not necessary, but possess an appetite that is easily dispersed whenever they appear difficult to procure or productive of harm. [XXVII.] Of the things which wisdom procures for the blessedness of the complete life, by far the greatest is the acquisition of friendship. [XXVIII.] The same conviction that made us confident that nothing terrible is eternal or long-lasting also perceived that security within these very limited bounds is most especially brought to completion through friendship.

Syntax notes4 items
  1. 10.1.143μὴ κατειδότα ... ὑποπτευόμενόν τι

    Accusative participles functioning as the semantic subject of the infinitive λύειν in an impersonal construction with οὐκ ἦν. Instead of a dative dependent on ἦν, the accusative agrees with the implied subject of the infinitive.

  2. 10.1.144τῆς δὲ διανοίας τὸ πέρας τὸ κατὰ τὴν ἡδονὴν ἀπεγέννησεν ἥ τε τούτων αὐτῶν ἐκλόγησις

    Hyperbaton/inversion of word order: the direct object clause τῆς διανοίας τὸ πέρας τὸ κατὰ τὴν ἡδονήν ('the limit of the mind in respect of pleasure') is placed first, while the subject ἥ τε τούτων αὐτῶν ἐκλόγησις... follows the verb ἀπεγέννησεν.

  3. 10.1.146οὐδʼ ἃς ἂν φῇς αὐτῶν διεψεῦσθαι πρὸς τί ποιούμενος τὴν ἀναγωγὴν κρίνῃς

    A complex construction governed by οὐχ ἕξεις, combining a relative clause with indirect statement (ἃς ἂν φῇς αὐτῶν διεψεῦσθαι, 'whichever of them you claim to be deceived') with an embedded deliberative question (πρὸς τί ποιούμενος τὴν ἀναγωγὴν κρίνῃς, 'referring to what you are to judge').

  4. 10.1.147τὸ μὴ τὴν ἐπιμαρτύρησιν

    A substantivized phrase with an ellipsis of a participle (such as ἔχον or τυχόν). Coordinated with the preceding τὸ προσμένον ('that which awaits confirmation'), it acts as the object of βεβαιώσεις, meaning 'that which lacks confirming evidence/witness'.

Model: gemini-3.8-flashurn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:10.1.143-10.1.148