Humanitext Reader

Livy · History of Rome §31.20.1-31.20.7

Lentulus' Request for a Triumph and the Ovation

Passage 1047 of 1770 · Latin

Summary

Lucius Cornelius Lentulus returns from Spain and requests a triumph, but is refused by the senate due to a lack of precedent; eventually, a compromise is reached allowing him an ovation.

§31.20.1per idem tempus L. Cornelius Lentulus pro consule ex Hispania rediit.
About the same time, Lucius Cornelius Lentulus, proconsul, returned from Spain.
§31.20.2qui cum in senatu res ab se per multos annos fortiter feliciterque gestas exposuisset postulassetque, ut triumphanti sibi invehi liceret in urbem, §31.20.3res triumpho dignas esse censebat senatus, sed exemplum a maioribus non accepisse, ut, qui neque dictator neque consul neque praetor res gessisset, triumpharet: §31.20.4pro consule illum Hispaniam provinciam, non consulem aut praetorem obtinuisse.
When he had set forth in the senate the things bravely and successfully performed by him over many years, and had requested that he might be allowed to ride into the city in triumph, the senate judged indeed that his achievements were worthy of a triumph, but that they had received no precedent from their ancestors that anyone should triumph who had performed his achievements without having been dictator, consul, or praetor; for he had held the province of Spain as proconsul, not as consul or praetor.
§31.20.5decurrebatur tamen eo, ut ovans urbem iniret, intercedente Ti. Sempronio Longo tribuno plebis, qui nihilo magis id more maiorum aut ullo exemplo futurum diceret.
An agreement was nevertheless being reached to the effect that he should enter the city in ovation, though Tiberius Sempronius Longus, tribune of the plebs, opposed it, saying that this would be no more in accordance with the custom of the ancestors or any precedent.
§31.20.6postremo victus consensu patrum tribunus cessit, et ex senatus consulto L. Lentulus ovans urbem est ingressus.
At last, overcome by the consensus of the senators, the tribune gave way, and by a decree of the senate, Lucius Lentulus entered the city in ovation.
§31.20.7argenti tulit quadraginta tria milia pondo, auri duo milia quadringenta quinquaginta.
He brought forty-three thousand pounds of silver, and two thousand four hundred and fifty of gold.
militibus ex praeda centenos vicenos asses divisit.
Out of the booty he distributed one hundred and twenty asses to each of the soldiers.

Notes

  1. 31.20.3accepisse — The infinitive accepisse has the senate (or the Romans in general) as its implied subject. Under the indirect discourse depending on censebat, it expresses the senate's judgment that they had not received such a precedent.
  2. 31.20.3ut... triumpharet — The ut clause functions as an appositive or stipulative clause defining the specific content of the preceding exemplum (precedent).
  3. 31.20.5decurrebatur eo, ut — The impersonal passive verb decurrebatur literally means "it was run to that point (eo)". The ut clause expresses the specific compromise that was being reached.
  4. 31.20.5nihilo magis id more maiorum aut ullo exemplo futurum — This is an accusative-with-infinitive construction in indirect discourse, with esse omitted after futurum. nihilo magis is a comparative phrase expressing strong negation ("by no means more" / "no more").

Cite this passage

Livy, History of Rome §31.20.1-31.20.7. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.humanitext-lat2:31.20.1-31.20.7

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.