← Justinian I

The Digest of Justinian

§7.5.3.pr

Bequest of Usufruct of Debts and Legacies to Debtors

Following the senatusconsult, the usufruct of all things became capable of being bequeathed, leading to a debate on whether this includes debts (Nerva denying it, but Cassius and Proculus correctly affirming it), while Nerva himself allows bequest to the debtor with interest remitted.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →

[ULPIANUS libro octauo decimo ad Sabinum.]

[ULPIANUS in the eighteenth book on Sabinus.]

§7.5.3.pr

​Post quod1 omnium rerum usus fructus legari poterit. an et nominum?2 Nerua negauit: sed est uerius, quod Cassius et Proculus existimant, posse legari. idem tamen Nerua ipsi quoque debitori posse usum fructum legari scribit et remittendas ei usuras.3

​After this [senatusconsult], the usufruct of all things could be bequeathed. Whether also of debts? Nerva denied it: but that which Cassius and Proculus think, that it can be bequeathed, is more correct. Yet the same Nerva writes that a usufruct can be bequeathed to the debtor himself as well, and that the interest is to be remitted to him.

Syntax notes3 items
  1. 7.5.3.prPost quod

    The neuter singular relative pronoun quod refers back to the senatus consultum (senatusconsult) mentioned in the preceding section (§7.5.2.1). Thus, it means 'after this [senatusconsult]'.

  2. 7.5.3.prnominum

    Genitive plural of nomen (name, ledger entry). In Roman law, it refers to debts or financial claims recorded in accounts, and is regularly translated as 'debts' or 'claims'.

  3. 7.5.3.prremittendas ei usuras

    remittendas is a gerundive (future passive participle) forming an accusative-with-infinitive construction with esse omitted. Its subject accusative is usuras (plural accusative), expressing necessity or obligation ('interest must be remitted').

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-07-12)urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:7.5.3.pr