- Source
- Seneca, Lucius Annaeus. Ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales, Vol 1-3. Gummere, Richard Mott, editor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann, Ltd., 1917-1925.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.5-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:latinLit:phi1017.phi015.humanitext-lat2:92.27-92.35
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-11-07
Confirms that reason is a capacity common to both gods and humans, and explains how the wise man returns to divine heights by overcoming physical limits and remaining indifferent to the fate of his body after death.
"Dis," inquit, "inmortalibus solis et virtus et beata vita contigit, nobis umbra quaedam illorum bonorum et similitudo. Accedimus ad illa, non pervenimus." Ratio vero dis hominibusque communis est; haec in illis consummata est, in nobis consummabilis.
”To the immortal gods alone,” he says, “have both virtue and the happy life fallen; to us, a certain shadow and likeness of those goods. We approach them, we do not reach them.” But reason is common to gods and humans; this is perfected in them, and perfectible in us.
Sed ad desperationem nos vitia nostra perducunt; nam ille alter secundus est ut aliquis parum constans ad custodienda optima, cuius iudicium bibat1 etiamnunc et incertum est. Desideret oculorum atque aurium sensum, bonam valitudinem et non foedum aspectum corporis et habitu manente suo aetatis praeterea longius spatium.
But our vices lead us to despair; for that other is second, like someone not steady enough to guard the best things, whose judgment even now wavers and is uncertain. He may desire the sense of eyes and ears, good health, a not unsightly appearance of the body, and besides, a longer span of age with his physical state remaining intact.
Per hanc potest non paenitenda agi vita, at inperfecto viro huic malitiae vis quaedam inest, quia animum habet mobilem ad prava. Illa apparens malitia et exagitata abest; non est adhuc bonus, sed in bonum fingitur. Cuicumque autem deest aliquid ad bonum, malus est. Sed Si cui virtus animusque in corpore praesens, hic deos aequat, illo tendit originis suae memor Nemo inprobe2 eo conatur ascendere, unde descenderat. Quid est autem cur non existimes in eo divini aliquid existere, qui dei pars est? Totum hoc, quo continemur, et unum est et deus; et socii sumus eius et membra. Capax est noster animus, perfertur illo, si vitia non deprimant. Quemadmodum corporum nostrorum habitus erigitur et spectat in caelum, ita animus, cui in quantum vult licet porrigi, in hoc a natura rerum formatus est, ut paria dis vellet. Et si utatur suis viribus ac se in spatium suum extendat, non aliena via ad summa nititur.
Through this reason, a life not to be repented of can be led, yet in this imperfect man there is a certain force of malice, because he has a mind movable toward crooked things. That visible and driven malice is absent; he is not yet good, but is being shaped toward the good. But whoever lacks anything for the good is bad. But if anyone has virtue and spirit present in his body, he equals the gods, and mindful of his origin, he strives thither. No one is wicked in striving to ascend to that place whence he had descended. What is there, moreover, why you should not think something divine exists in him who is a part of God? This whole in which we are contained is both one and God; and we are his companions and members. Our mind is capable of this, and is carried thither, if vices do not weigh it down. Just as the posture of our bodies is upright and looks toward heaven, so the mind, which is allowed to be stretched as far as it wishes, has been formed by the nature of things for this purpose, to wish for things equal to the gods. And if it uses its own powers and extends itself into its own space, it strives to the summit not by an alien path.
Magnus erat labor ire in caelum; redit. Cum hoc iter nactus est, vadit audaciter contemptor omnium nec ad pecuniam respicit aurumque et argentum illis, in quibus iacuere, tenebris dignissima, non ab hoc aestimat splendore, quo inperitorum verberant oculos, sed a vetere caeno, ex quo illa secrevit cupiditas nostra et effodit. Scit, inquam, aliubi positas esse divitias quam quo congeruntur; animum impleri debere, non arcam.
It was a great labor to go to heaven; it returns. When it has obtained this journey, it goes boldly, a contemner of all things, nor does it look back at money, and it values gold and silver—things most worthy of the darkness in which they lay—not by this splendor with which they strike the eyes of the unskilled, but by the old filth from which our desire separated and dug them out. It knows, I say, that riches are placed elsewhere than where they are piled up; that the mind ought to be filled, not the money-chest.
Hunc inponere dominio rerum omnium licet, hunc in possessionem rerum naturae inducere, ut sua orientis occidentisque terminis finiat deorumque ritu cuncta possideat. cum opibus suis divites superne despiciat. quorum nemo tam suo laetus est quid cristis3 alieno.
One may place this man in dominion over all things, and lead him into possession of the nature of things, so that he may limit his own possessions by the boundaries of the east and west, and possess all things in the manner of the gods, and from above look down upon the rich with their wealth, of whom no one is so pleased with his own things as he is saddened by another’s.
Cum se in hanc sublimitatem edit. corporis quoque ut oneris necessarii non amator, sed procurator est nec se illi, cui inpositus est, subicit. Nemo liber est, qui corpori servit. Nam ut alios dominos, quos nimia pro illo sollicitudo invenit; transeas, ipsius morosum imperium delicatumque est.
When he raises himself into this sublimity, he is not a lover but a manager of the body as a necessary burden, nor does he subject himself to that upon which he has been placed. No one is free who serves the body. For even if you pass over other masters whom excessive anxiety for the body finds, the command of the body itself is moody and fastidious.
Ab hoc modo aequo animo exit, modo nihilo prosilit, nec quis deinde relicti eius futurus sic exitus quaerit. Sed ut ex barba capilloque tonsa neglegimus, ita ille divinus animus egressurus hominem. quo receptaculum suum conferatur. ignis illud exurat an lapis includat an terra conterat an ferae distrahant. non magis ad se iudicat pertinere quam secundas4 ad editum infantem. Utrum proiectum aves differant. an consumatur Canibus data praeda marinis. quid ad illum, qui nullus est?
From this body he departs sometimes with an even mind, sometimes he leaps out unexpectedly, nor does he ask what the future end of his abandoned body will be. But just as we neglect the shaved hair from a beard and head, so that divine mind, about to depart from the man, judges where its receptacle is gathered—whether fire burns it, a stone encloses it, the earth crushes it, or wild beasts tear it apart—to pertain to itself no more than the afterbirth to a newborn infant. Whether, cast out, the birds tear it apart, or it is consumed as prey given to marine dogs, what is that to him who is no more?
Sed tunc quoque, cum inter homines est, non timet ullas post mortem minas eorum, quibus usque ad mortem timeri parum est. Non conferret, inquit, me nec uncus nec proiecti ai5 contumeliam cadaveris laceratio foeda visuris. Neminem de supremo officio rogo. nulli reliquias meas commendo. Ne quis insepultus esset, rerum natura prospexit. Quem saevitia proiecerit, die; condet. Diserte Maecenas ait: "Nec tumulum curo. Sepelit natura relictos." Alte cinctum putes dixisse. Habuit enim ingenium et grande et virile, ruri6 illud secundis discinxisset. VALE.
But even then, when he is among men, he does not fear any threats after death from those for whom being feared up to death is not enough. “Neither the hook,” he says, “nor the foul tearing apart of the cast-out body for those who will see it as an insult, will terrify me. I ask no one for the last service, I commend my remains to no one. Nature has provided that no one should be unburied. Time will cover him whom cruelty has cast out.” Maecenas eloquently says: “I care not for a tomb. Nature buries those left behind.” You might think a man girt up had said this. For he had a grand and manly genius, if only he had not loosened it in prosperity. FAREWELL.
- 92.28bibat
This appears to be a corrupt reading in the manuscript tradition (perhaps a misspelling of vibrat 'wavers' or vacillat 'totters'). It is translated here to indicate a state in which judgment is still unsettled and fluctuating.
- 92.30inprobe
The adverb inprobe means 'improperly' or 'presumptuously'. Combined with nemo, it expresses a positive nuance close to a double negation: 'no one is unjustified in striving to ascend' back to the divine realm of the soul's origin.
- 92.32quid cristis
This is a clear manuscript error, generally emended to quam tristis ('how saddened'). It is interpreted as a psychological contrast with the worldly rich who are saddened (envious) by seeing the abundance of others' possessions.
- 92.34secundas
The feminine plural noun secundae refers to the 'afterbirth' (placenta) in medical and anatomical contexts. It serves as a metaphor comparing the abandoned body after the soul's departure to the useless placenta left after childbirth.
- 92.35conferret... ai
This is a corruption in the manuscripts, generally corrected to conterret ('terrify') and ad ('to/for'). It indicates that the mutilation or public display of the corpse does not terrify the wise man in the least.
- 92.35ruri
A manuscript error, generally emended to nisi ('unless/if not'). It introduces a conditional clause suggesting that Maecenas possessed a grand genius, provided he had not loosened it (discinxisset) due to prosperity (secundis [rebus]).
