← Seneca the Younger

Moral Letters to Lucilius

§75.10-75.18

Diseases of the Soul and the Stages of Moral Progress

Seneca defines the difference between mental "diseases" and "passions," details the three stages of moral progress, and emphasizes the ultimate value of attaining self-mastery and absolute freedom of the soul.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§75.10

​Quidam hoc proficientium genus, de quo locutus sum, ita complectuntur, ut illos dicant iam effugisse morbos animi, adfectus nondum, et adhuc in lubrico stare, quia nemo sit extra periculum malitiae, nisi qui totam eam excussit. Nemo autem illam excussit, nisi qui pro illa sapientiam adsumpsit.

​Some define this class of those making progress, of whom I have spoken, in such a way as to say that they have already escaped the diseases of the soul, but not yet the passions, and still stand on slippery ground, because no one is out of the danger of malice except the one who has shaken it off entirely. And no one has shaken it off except the one who has assumed wisdom in its place.

§75.11

​Quid inter morbos animi intersit et adfectus, saepe iam dixi. Nunc quoque te admonebo: morbi sunt inveterata vitia et dura, ut avaritia, ut ambitio; nimio artius haec animum inplicuerunt et perpetua eius mala esse coeperunt. Ut breviter finiam, morbus est iudicium in pravo1 pertinax, tamquam valde expetenda sint, quae leviter expetenda sunt. Vel si mavis, ita finiamus: nimis inminere leviter petendis vel ex toto non petendis, aut in magno pretio habere in aliquo habenda vel in nullo.

​What the difference is between the diseases of the soul and the passions, I have already often said. Now too I will remind you: diseases are deep-seated and hardened vices, such as avarice, such as ambition; these have entangled the soul too tightly and have begun to be its permanent evils. To define it briefly, a disease is a persistent judgment in a wrong direction, as if those things were greatly to be sought which are only lightly to be sought. Or, if you prefer, let us define it thus: to be excessively intent on things that are lightly to be sought or not to be sought at all, or to hold in high value things that are to be held in some value or in none.

§75.12

​Adfectus sunt motus animi inprobabiles, subiti et concitati, qui frequentes neglectique fecere morbum, sicut destillatio una nec adhuc in morem adducta tussim facit, adsidua et vetus phthisin. Itaque qui plurimum profecere, extra morbos sunt, adfectus adhuc sentiunt perfecto proximi.

​Passions are objectionable, sudden, and violent movements of the soul, which, when frequent and neglected, have produced a disease, just as a single rheum that is not yet habitual produces a cough, but a constant and chronic one produces consumption. Therefore, those who have made the greatest progress are outside of diseases, but they still feel the passions, being closest to the perfect state.

§75.13

​Secundum genus est eorum, qui et maxima animi mala et adfectus deposuerunt, sed ita, ut non sit illis securitatis suae certa possessio. Possunt enim in eadem relabi.

​The second class is of those who have laid aside both the greatest evils of the soul and the passions, but in such a way that they do not have a secure possession of their peace. For they can relapse into the same.

§75.14

​Tertium illud genus extra multa et magna vitia est, sed non extra omnia. Effugit avaritiam, sed iram adhuc sentit; iam non sollicitatur libidine, etiamnunc ambitione; iam non concupiscit, sed adhuc timet. Et in ipso metu ad quaedam satis firmus est, quibusdam cedit. Mortem contemnit, dolorem reformidat.

​That third class is outside many and great vices, but not outside all. It has escaped avarice, but still feels anger; it is no longer troubled by lust, but still by ambition; it no longer covets, but still fears. And in fear itself, it is firm enough against certain things, but yields to others. It despises death, but dreads pain.

§75.15

​De hoc loco aliquid cogitemus. Bene nobiscum agetur,2 si in hunc admittimur numerum. Magna felicitate naturae magnaque et adsidua intentione studii secundus occupatur gradus; sed ne hic quidem contemnendus est color tertius. Cogita, quantum circa te videas malorum, aspice, quam nullum sit nefas sine exemplo, quantum cotidie nequitia proficiat, quantum publice privatimque peccetur; intelleges satis nos consequi, si inter pessimos non sumus.

​Let us reflect on this state. It will go well with us if we are admitted into this number. The second step is occupied by a great favor of nature and a great and constant application of study; but not even this third color is to be despised. Think of how many evils you see around you; behold how there is no crime without precedent, how much wickedness advances daily, how much sin is committed publicly and privately; you will understand that we achieve enough if we are not among the worst.

§75.16

" Ego vero," inquis, "spero me posse et amplioris ordinis fieri." Optaverim hoc nobis magis quam promiserim;3 praeoccupati sumus. Ad virtutem contendimus inter vitia districti. Pudet dicere: honesta colimus, quantum vacat. At quam grande praemium expectat, si occupationes nostras et mala tenacissima abrumpimus. Non cupiditas nos, non timor pellet, ​Inagitati terroribus, incorrupti voluptatibus nec mortem horrebimus nec deos; sciemus mortem malum non esse, deos malo non esse.4 Tam inbecillum est quod nocet quam cui nocetur, optima vi noxia carent.

”But I,” you say, “hope that I can become of an even higher class.” I should wish this for us rather than promise it; we are already preoccupied. We strive toward virtue while distracted among vices. It is shameful to say: we cultivate honorable things only as much as we have leisure. But what a grand reward awaits us if we break off our distractions and most tenacious evils! Neither desire nor fear will drive us; ​undisturbed by terrors, uncorrupted by pleasures, we shall dread neither death nor the gods; we shall know that death is not an evil, and that the gods are not a source of evil. That which harms is as weak as that which is harmed; the best powers are free from harmfulness.

§75.18

​Expectant nos, si ex hac aliquando faece in illud evadimus sublime et excelsum, tranquillitas animi et expulsis erroribus absoluta libertas. Quaeris quae sit ista? Non homines timere, non deos; nec turpia velle nec nimia; in se ipsum habere maximam potestatem. Inaestimabile bonum est suum fieri. VALE.

​Peace of mind and absolute liberty, with errors driven out, await us if we ever escape from this dregs into that sublime and lofty height. Do you ask what that liberty is? To fear neither men nor gods; to desire neither shameful things nor excessive things; to have the greatest power over oneself. It is an inestimable good to become one’s own master. FAREWELL.

Syntax notes4 items
  1. 75.11in pravo

    A substantival use of the neuter singular of the adjective pravus ('crooked', 'wrong'). Here it is interpreted adverbially as 'in a wrong direction', modifying the noun iudicium ('judgment').

  2. 75.15Bene nobiscum agetur

    A future tense of the impersonal passive expression bene agitur cum aliquo ('it goes well with someone', 'someone is well-treated'). With nobiscum (an inversion of cum nobis), the phrase means 'it will go well with us' or 'we shall be in a fortunate position'.

  3. 75.16Optaverim... promiserim

    Both verbs are in the perfect subjunctive, functioning here as potential subjunctives or modest assertions to express a gentle wish: 'I should wish rather than promise'.

  4. 75.17deos malo non esse

    The word malo is the dative of malum ('evil', 'harm'). It functions here as a dative of purpose or predicate dative, explaining that 'the gods are not a source of evil (to humans)' due to their inherent goodness.

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-25) · Revision history (1, latest 2026-09-21)
  • 2026-09-21 AI review — note 1
urn:cts:latinLit:phi1017.phi015.humanitext-lat2:75.10-75.18