← Seneca the Younger

Moral Letters to Lucilius

§75.1-75.9

Unadorned Philosophical Style and the First Stage of Progress

In response to Lucilius' complaint about his less carefully composed letters, Seneca argues that philosophical correspondence should be natural, unadorned, and focused on inner progress. He likens philosophical guidance to medical treatment where substance is valued over style, and begins to outline three stages of moral progress, characterizing the first class of those who have attained near-wisdom but still lack confidence.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§75.1

​Minus tibi accuratas a me epistulas mitti querens.1 Quis enim accurate loquitur, nisi qui vult putide loqui? Qualis sermo meus esset, si una sederemus aut ambularemus, inlaboratus et facilis, tales esse epistulas meas volo, quae nihil habent accersitum nec fictum.

​Your complaint is that less carefully composed letters are sent to you by me. For who speaks with meticulous care, unless he wants to speak in an affected manner? Such as my conversation would be if we were sitting or walking together, unlabored and easy, such I wish my letters to be, which have nothing fetched from afar nor fictitious.

§75.2

​Si fieri posset, quid sentiam, ostendere quam loqui mallem. Etiam si disputarem, nec supploderem pedem nec manum iactarem nec attollerem vocem, sed ista oratoribus reliquissent!, contentus sensus meos ad te pertulisse, quos nec exornassem nec abiecissem.2

​If it could be done, I should prefer to show what I feel rather than to speak it. Even if I were debating, I would neither stamp my foot, nor wave my hand, nor raise my voice, but I would have left those things to the orators, content to have conveyed my thoughts to you, which I would have neither adorned nor degraded.

§75.3

​Hoc unum plane tibi adprobare vellem: omnia me illa sentire, quae dicerem, nec tantum sentire, sed amare. Aliter homines amicam, aliter liberos osculantur; tamen in hoc quoque amplexu tam sancto et moderato satis apparet adfectus. Non mehercules ieiuna esse et arida volo, quae de rebus tam magnis dicentur; neque enim philosophia ingenio renuntiat. Multum tamen operae inpendi verbis non oportet.

​This one thing indeed I should wish to prove to you: that I feel all those things that I say, and not only feel them, but love them. People kiss a mistress in one way, and their children in another; yet in this latter embrace also, so holy and moderate, affection is sufficiently apparent. I do not, by Hercules, want what is said about such great matters to be starved and dry; for philosophy does not renounce talent. Yet much labor ought not to be spent on words.

§75.4

​Haec sit propositi nostri summa: quod sentimus loquamur, quod loquimur sentiamus; concordet sermo cum vita. Ille promissum suum inplevit, qui, et cum videas illum et cum audias, idem est.

​Let this be the sum of our purpose: let us speak what we feel, let us feel what we speak; let our speech harmonize with our life. He has fulfilled his promise who, both when you see him and when you hear him, is the same.

§75.5

​Videbimus, qualis sit, quantus sit; unus sit. Non delectent verba nostra, sed prosint. Si tamen contingere eloquentia non sollicito potest, si aut parata est aut parvo constat, adsit et res pulcherrimas prosequatur. Sit talis, ut res potius quam se ostendat. Aliae artes ad ingenium totae pertinent, hic animi negotium agitur.

​We shall see what sort of man he is, how great he is; let him be one. Let our words not delight, but benefit. If, however, eloquence can fall to the lot of one who is not anxious for it, if it is either ready at hand or costs little, let it be present and accompany the most beautiful subjects. Let it be such that it shows the matter rather than itself. Other arts belong entirely to talent; here, the business of the soul is being transacted.

§75.6

​Non quaerit aeger medicum eloquentem, sed, si ita conpetit, ut idem ille, qui sanare potest, compte de iis, quae facienda sunt, disserat, boni consulet. Non tamen erit, quare gratuletur sibi, quod inciderit in medicum etiam disertum. Hoc enim tale est, quale si peritus gubernator etiam formosus est.

​A sick man does not look for an eloquent physician, but if it so happens that the very same man who can cure can also discuss elegantly what needs to be done, he will take it in good part. Yet there will be no reason for him to congratulate himself because he has run into a physician who is also eloquent. For this is of such a kind as if a skilled pilot were also handsome.

§75.7

​Quid aures meas scabis? Quid oblectas? Aliud agitur; urendus, secandus, abstinendus sum. Ad haec adhibitus es. Curare debes morbum veterem, gravem, publicum. Tantum negotii habes, quantum in pestilentia medicus. Circa verba occupatus es? Iamdudum gaude, si sufficis rebus. Quando, quae multa disces? Quando, quae didiceris, adfiges tibi ita, ut excidere non possint? Quando illa experieris? Non enim ut cetera, memoriae tradidisse satis est; in opere temptanda sunt. Non est beatus, qui scit illa, sed qui facit. "Quid ergo?

​Why do you tickle my ears? Why do you entertain me? Something else is at stake; I am to be cauterized, incised, kept on a strict diet. For these things you have been called in. You have to cure an old, severe, public disease. You have as much business as a physician has in a plague. Are you busy about words? Rejoice long ago if you are equal to the facts. When will you learn so many things? When will you fix what you have learned in yourself so that they cannot slip away? When will you try them in practice? For it is not enough, as in other things, to have committed them to memory; they must be tested in action. He is not happy who knows those things, but he who does them.” “What then?

§75.8

​Infra illum nulli gradus sunt? Statim a sapientia praeceps est?" Non, ut existimo. Nam qui proficit, in numero quidem stultorum est, magno tamen intervallo ab illis diducitur. Inter ipsos quoque proficientes sunt magna discrimina. In tres classes, ut quibusdam placet, dividuntur: primi sunt, qui sapientiam nondum habent, sed iam in vicinia eius constiterant.

​Are there no steps below him? Is there a precipice immediately down from wisdom?” No, as I think. For he who makes progress is indeed in the number of the foolish, yet he is separated from them by a great interval. Among those making progress themselves there are also great distinctions. They are divided into three classes, as it pleases some: the first are those who do not yet possess wisdom, but have already taken their stand in its neighborhood.

§75.9

​Tamen etiam quod prope est, extra est. Qui sint hi quaeris? Qui omnes iam adfectus ac vitia posuerunt, quae erant complectenda,3 didicerunt, sed illis adhuc inexperta fiducia est. Bonum suum nondum in usu habent, iam tamen in illa, quae fugerunt, decidere non possunt. Iam ibi sunt, unde non est retro lapsus, sed hoc illis de se nondum liquet; quod in quadam epistula scripsisse me memini, "scire se nesciunt." Iam contigit illis bono suo frui, nondum confidere.

​Yet even what is near is still outside. Who are these, you ask? Those who have already laid aside all passions and vices, and have learned what had to be mastered, but their confidence is still untested. They do not yet have their good in use, yet they can no longer fall back into those things which they have fled. They are already in a place from which there is no backward slip, but this is not yet clear to them concerning themselves; as I remember writing in a certain letter, “they do not know that they know.” It has already fallen to their lot to enjoy their good, but not yet to trust it.

Syntax notes3 items
  1. 75.1Minus tibi accuratas a me epistulas mitti querens

    The present participle querens (complaining) at the very beginning of the letter is used without an explicit main clause. It functions as a conversational transitional formula to introduce Lucilius' objection, equivalent to a finite verb like "quereris" (you complain).

  2. 75.2sed ista oratoribus … nec abiecissem

    The pluperfect subjunctive forms reliquissem (I would have left), exornassem (syncopated from exornavissem, I would have adorned), and abiecissem (I would have degraded) function as the apodosis of a contrary-to-fact conditional sentence. Following the imperfect subjunctive Etiam si disputarem (Even if I were debating), they express completed actions that would have occurred under that hypothetical scenario.

  3. 75.9quae erant complectenda

    Within the relative clause, complectenda is a gerundive (future passive participle) in the neuter plural, expressing necessity or obligation. It refers to the core doctrines or concepts that "had to be embraced/mastered" by those in the first class of progress.

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-25) · Revision history (2, latest 2026-09-22)
  • 2026-09-22 AI review — source 1
  • 2026-09-21 AI review — translation 1
urn:cts:latinLit:phi1017.phi015.humanitext-lat2:75.1-75.9